Suppr超能文献

环境健康研究中的词汇中立性:关于“可步行性”一词的思考

Lexical neutrality in environmental health research: Reflections on the term walkability.

作者信息

Hajna Samantha, Ross Nancy A, Griffin Simon J, Dasgupta Kaberi

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institue of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0QQ, UK.

Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):940. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4943-y.

Abstract

Neighbourhood environments have important implications for human health. In this piece, we reflect on the environments and health literature and argue that precise use of language is critical for acknowledging the complex and multifaceted influence that neighbourhood environments may have on physical activity and physical activity-related outcomes. Specifically, we argue that the term "neighbourhood walkability", commonly used in the neighbourhoods and health literature, constrains recognition of the breadth of influence that neighbourhood environments might have on a variety of physical activity behaviours. The term draws attention to a single type of physical activity and implies that a universal association exists when in fact the literature is quite mixed. To maintain neutrality in this area of research, we suggest that researchers adopt the term "neighbourhood physical activity environments" for collective measures of neighbourhood attributes that they wish to study in relation to physical activity behaviours or physical activity-related health outcomes.

摘要

邻里环境对人类健康具有重要影响。在本文中,我们对环境与健康方面的文献进行了思考,并认为准确使用语言对于认识邻里环境可能对身体活动及与身体活动相关的结果产生的复杂多面的影响至关重要。具体而言,我们认为邻里与健康文献中常用的“邻里可步行性”一词,限制了对邻里环境可能对多种身体活动行为产生的广泛影响的认识。该术语将注意力集中在单一类型的身体活动上,并暗示存在一种普遍关联,而实际上相关文献的观点并不统一。为在这一研究领域保持中立,我们建议研究人员采用“邻里身体活动环境”这一术语,用于对他们希望就身体活动行为或与身体活动相关的健康结果进行研究的邻里属性进行综合衡量。

相似文献

1
Lexical neutrality in environmental health research: Reflections on the term walkability.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):940. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4943-y.
10
Neighbourhood walkability, road density and socio-economic status in Sydney, Australia.
Environ Health. 2016 Apr 27;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0135-y.

本文引用的文献

2
The impact of neighborhood walkability on walking: does it differ across adult life stage and does neighborhood buffer size matter?
Health Place. 2014 Jan;25:43-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
3
The relationship between built environments and physical activity: a systematic review.
Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):e7-e13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300740. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
4
A conversation with Olli Miettinen. Interview by James A. Hanley.
Epidemiology. 2012 May;23(3):495-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824968b9.
5
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
7
Walking decreased risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in older adults with diabetes.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;60(3):309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
8
Why most published research findings are false.
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
9
From walkability to active living potential: an "ecometric" validation study.
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.029.
10
The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: a scientific research agenda.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1500-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1500.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验