Hajna Samantha, Ross Nancy A, Griffin Simon J, Dasgupta Kaberi
MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institue of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):940. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4943-y.
Neighbourhood environments have important implications for human health. In this piece, we reflect on the environments and health literature and argue that precise use of language is critical for acknowledging the complex and multifaceted influence that neighbourhood environments may have on physical activity and physical activity-related outcomes. Specifically, we argue that the term "neighbourhood walkability", commonly used in the neighbourhoods and health literature, constrains recognition of the breadth of influence that neighbourhood environments might have on a variety of physical activity behaviours. The term draws attention to a single type of physical activity and implies that a universal association exists when in fact the literature is quite mixed. To maintain neutrality in this area of research, we suggest that researchers adopt the term "neighbourhood physical activity environments" for collective measures of neighbourhood attributes that they wish to study in relation to physical activity behaviours or physical activity-related health outcomes.
邻里环境对人类健康具有重要影响。在本文中,我们对环境与健康方面的文献进行了思考,并认为准确使用语言对于认识邻里环境可能对身体活动及与身体活动相关的结果产生的复杂多面的影响至关重要。具体而言,我们认为邻里与健康文献中常用的“邻里可步行性”一词,限制了对邻里环境可能对多种身体活动行为产生的广泛影响的认识。该术语将注意力集中在单一类型的身体活动上,并暗示存在一种普遍关联,而实际上相关文献的观点并不统一。为在这一研究领域保持中立,我们建议研究人员采用“邻里身体活动环境”这一术语,用于对他们希望就身体活动行为或与身体活动相关的健康结果进行研究的邻里属性进行综合衡量。