University of Queensland, Australia.
University of Queensland, Australia.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Dec;18:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Even though there is growing awareness that economic inequality is harmful for people's health, the way that such inequality affects social behavior and political attitudes remains poorly understood. Moving beyond a focus on the health and well-being costs of income inequality, we review research that examines how economic inequality shapes dynamics between groups within societies, addressing the questions why, when, and for whom inequality affects social behavior and political attitudes. On the basis of classic social identity theorizing, we develop five hypotheses that focus on the way inequality shapes the fit of wealth categorizations (H1), intergroup relations (H2), and stereotypes about wealth groups (H3). We also theorize how the effects of inequality are moderated by socio-structural conditions (H4) and socio-economic status (H5). Together, these hypotheses provide a theoretically informed account of the way in which inequality undermines the social fabric of society and negatively affects citizen's social and political behavior.
尽管人们越来越意识到经济不平等对人们的健康有害,但这种不平等如何影响社会行为和政治态度仍知之甚少。超越对收入不平等的健康和福祉成本的关注,我们回顾了研究经济不平等如何塑造社会内部群体之间动态的研究,探讨了不平等影响社会行为和政治态度的原因、时间和对象。基于经典的社会认同理论,我们提出了五个假设,重点关注不平等塑造财富分类契合度的方式(H1)、群体间关系(H2)和对财富群体的刻板印象(H3)。我们还从理论上探讨了不平等的影响如何受到社会结构条件(H4)和社会经济地位(H5)的调节。这些假设共同提供了一个理论上的解释,说明不平等如何破坏社会结构,对公民的社会和政治行为产生负面影响。