Suppr超能文献

人格的个体差异调节了感知到的群体剥夺对暴力极端主义的影响:来自英国全国代表性调查的证据。

Individual Differences in Personality Moderate the Effects of Perceived Group Deprivation on Violent Extremism: Evidence From a United Kingdom Nationally Representative Survey.

作者信息

Rottweiler Bettina, Gill Paul

机构信息

Security and Crime Science Department, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:790770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.790770. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Numerous studies argue that perceived group deprivation is a risk factor for radicalization and violent extremism. Yet, the vast majority of individuals, who experience such circumstances do not become radicalized. By utilizing models with several interacting risk and protective factors, the present analysis specifies this relationship more concretely. In a large United Kingdom nationally representative survey ( = 1,500), we examine the effects of group-based relative deprivation on violent extremist attitudes and violent extremist intentions, and we test whether this relationship is contingent upon several individual differences in personality. The results show that stronger group-based injustices lead to increased support for and intentions to engage in violent extremism. However, some of the effects are much stronger for individuals who exhibit a stronger need for uniqueness and for status and who demonstrate higher levels of trait entitlement. Conversely, several effects are lessened for those individuals high in trait forgiveness, demonstrating a strong capacity for self-control and for those who are exerting critical as well as open-minded thinking styles, thus constituting buffering protective factors, which dampen the adverse effects of perceived group injustice on violent extremism. The results highlight the importance of considering (a) the interaction between individual dispositions and perceptions of contextual factors (b) the conditional and cumulative effects of various risk and protective factors and (c) the functional role of protective factors when risk factors are present. Collectively, these findings bring us one step closer to understanding who might be more vulnerable to violent extremism as well as how. Overall, the study suggests that preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) programs must take account of the constellation of multiple factors that interact with (and sometimes enable or disable) one another and which can be targeted in preventions strategies.

摘要

众多研究认为,感知到的群体剥夺是激进化和暴力极端主义的一个风险因素。然而,绝大多数经历此类情况的人并未激进化。通过运用包含多个相互作用的风险和保护因素的模型,本分析更具体地明确了这种关系。在一项针对英国全国范围的大型代表性调查(样本量 = 1500)中,我们研究了基于群体的相对剥夺对暴力极端主义态度和暴力极端主义意图的影响,并测试这种关系是否取决于人格方面的若干个体差异。结果表明,更强的基于群体的不公正会导致对暴力极端主义的支持增加以及参与暴力极端主义的意图增强。然而,对于那些表现出更强的独特性需求、地位需求以及更高水平特质应得感的个体,某些影响要强烈得多。相反,对于那些特质宽容度高、表现出强大自我控制能力以及运用批判性和开放思维方式的个体,若干影响会减弱,从而构成缓冲保护因素,减轻感知到的群体不公正对暴力极端主义的不利影响。结果凸显了考虑以下几点的重要性:(a) 个体性情与情境因素认知之间的相互作用;(b) 各种风险和保护因素的条件性和累积性影响;以及 (c) 当存在风险因素时保护因素的功能性作用。总体而言,这些发现使我们在理解谁可能更容易受到暴力极端主义影响以及如何受到影响方面又迈进了一步。总的来说,该研究表明,预防和打击暴力极端主义(P/CVE)项目必须考虑相互作用(有时相互促成或抵消)且可在预防策略中加以针对的多种因素的组合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db4f/8908237/7dd090db7499/fpsyg-13-790770-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验