• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拒绝显著干扰因素:从经验中归纳。

Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.

作者信息

Vatterott Daniel B, Mozer Michael C, Vecera Shaun P

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, W311 Seashore Hall, Iowa City, IA, 52242-1407, USA.

Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0430, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):485-499. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1465-8.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-017-1465-8
PMID:29230673
Abstract

Distraction impairs performance of many important, everyday tasks. Attentional control limits distraction by preferentially selecting important items for limited-capacity cognitive operations. Research in attentional control has typically investigated the degree to which selection of items is stimulus-driven versus goal-driven. Recent work finds that when observers initially learn a task, the selection is based on stimulus-driven factors, but through experience, goal-driven factors have an increasing influence. The modulation of selection by goals has been studied within the paradigm of learned distractor rejection, in which experience over a sequence of trials enables individuals eventually to ignore a perceptually salient distractor. The experiments presented examine whether observers can generalize learned distractor rejection to novel distractors. Observers searched for a target and ignored a salient color-singleton distractor that appeared in half of the trials. In Experiment 1, observers who learned distractor rejection in a variable environment rejected a novel distractor more effectively than observers who learned distractor rejection in a less variable, homogeneous environment, demonstrating that variable, heterogeneous stimulus environments encourage generalizable learned distractor rejection. Experiments 2 and 3 investigated the time course of learned distractor rejection across the experiment and found that after experiencing four color-singleton distractors in different blocks, observers could effectively reject subsequent novel color-singleton distractors. These results suggest that the optimization of attentional control to the task environment can be interpreted as a form of learning, demonstrating experience's critical role in attentional control.

摘要

注意力分散会损害许多重要的日常任务的表现。注意力控制通过优先选择重要项目进行容量有限的认知操作来限制注意力分散。注意力控制方面的研究通常调查项目选择在多大程度上是由刺激驱动的还是目标驱动的。最近的研究发现,当观察者最初学习一项任务时,选择是基于刺激驱动因素,但通过经验,目标驱动因素的影响越来越大。目标对选择的调节作用已在学习性干扰物抑制范式中进行了研究,在该范式中,一系列试验中的经验使个体最终能够忽略一个在感知上很突出的干扰物。本文呈现的实验研究了观察者是否能将学习到的干扰物抑制推广到新的干扰物上。观察者搜索一个目标,并忽略在一半试验中出现的一个突出的颜色单一干扰物。在实验1中,在可变环境中学习干扰物抑制的观察者比在变化较小、较为单一的环境中学习干扰物抑制的观察者更有效地拒绝了新的干扰物,这表明可变的、异质的刺激环境会促进可推广的学习性干扰物抑制。实验2和实验3研究了整个实验过程中学习性干扰物抑制的时间进程,发现观察者在不同组块中经历了四个颜色单一干扰物后,能够有效地拒绝随后出现的新的颜色单一干扰物。这些结果表明,将注意力控制优化到任务环境可以被解释为一种学习形式,证明了经验在注意力控制中的关键作用。

相似文献

1
Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.拒绝显著干扰因素:从经验中归纳。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):485-499. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1465-8.
2
Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.视觉搜索中对多个特征的习得性和线索性干扰项抑制
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Feb;81(2):359-376. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1622-8.
3
Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.干扰项基于特征的统计规律调节注意捕获。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):419-433. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000613.
4
Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.显著颜色单一干扰项引起的注意捕获受自上而下的维度集调节。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.1.
5
Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.突显度影响对突发和颜色单一干扰物的注意力捕获和抑制:来自事件相关电位研究的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Aug;60(8):e14290. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14290. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
6
History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.历史调节显著干扰物的早期感觉处理。
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 22;41(38):8007-8022. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3099-20.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection.经验依赖性的分心物抑制调节。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):871-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0280-4.
8
Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.在强烈目标引导下的学习性分心物抑制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Sep;46(9):926-941. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000757. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.当干扰项在快速序列视觉呈现期间保持可见时,注意力捕捉会减少。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):939-50. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.939.
10
Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.当干扰项具有不止一个特征时,视觉搜索中的干扰项排除功能就会失效。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 May;42(5):648-57. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000180. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Signal suppression 2.0: An updated account of attentional capture and suppression.信号抑制2.0:注意捕获与抑制的最新阐述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02736-z.
2
The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Mechanisms of Attentional Control in Young and Older Adults: A Preregistered Eye Tracking Study.正念冥想对年轻人和老年人注意力控制机制的影响:一项预注册的眼动追踪研究。
eNeuro. 2025 Jul 24;12(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0356-23.2025. Print 2025 Jul.
3
The consequences of preparing for informative or distracting stimuli.

本文引用的文献

1
Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition.驯服白熊:分心抑制的初始成本和最终收益。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):476-85. doi: 10.1177/0956797615626564. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
2
Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.主动抑制显著但无关的感觉输入的直接证据。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;26(11):1740-50. doi: 10.1177/0956797615597913. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
3
Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.视觉搜索中负性特征引导的证据可通过空间重新编码来解释。
为信息性或干扰性刺激做准备的后果。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02476-z.
4
Learned distractor rejection: Robust but surprisingly rapid.习得性干扰项排除:稳健但速度惊人。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1132-1149. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03051-4. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
5
Unpredictable singleton distractors in visual search can be subject to second-order suppression.视觉搜索中不可预测的单一干扰项可能会受到二阶抑制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):832-847. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03028-3. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
6
Neural mechanisms of learned suppression uncovered by probing the hidden attentional priority map.通过探测隐藏的注意力优先级图谱揭示的习得性抑制的神经机制。
Elife. 2025 Feb 26;13:RP98304. doi: 10.7554/eLife.98304.
7
Diverse neuronal activity patterns contribute to the control of distraction in the prefrontal and parietal cortex.多种神经元活动模式有助于前额叶和顶叶皮质中注意力分散的控制。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):e3003008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003008. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.衰老会损害反应性注意控制,但不会损害前摄性分心物抑制。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1938-1959. doi: 10.1037/xge0001602. Epub 2024 May 23.
9
Distinct mechanisms of attentional suppression: exploration of trait factors underlying cued- and learned-suppression.注意抑制的不同机制:探究线索抑制和习得性抑制的特质因素基础。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 1;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00554-w.
10
Sustained training with novel distractors attenuates the behavioral interference of emotional pictures but does not affect the electrocortical markers of emotional processing.使用新型干扰物进行持续训练可减弱情绪图片的行为干扰,但不影响情绪加工的皮层电活动指标。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 7;15:1322792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1322792. eCollection 2024.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1190-6. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000109. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
4
Establishment of an attentional set via statistical learning.通过统计学习建立注意集。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/a0034489. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.自上而下与自下而上的注意控制:一个失败的理论二分法。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
6
Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized.自上而下的注意力控制:它是渐进的、依赖于练习的、层次化组织的。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):941-57. doi: 10.1037/a0027629. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
7
Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.拒绝模板:配置注意力以忽略任务不相关的特征。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4. doi: 10.1037/a0027885. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
8
Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA.计算和绘制 ANOVA 的个体内置信区间。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):158-75. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0123-7.
9
An integrative, experience-based theory of attentional control.一种基于经验的注意力控制综合理论。
J Vis. 2011 Feb 9;11(2):8. doi: 10.1167/11.2.8.
10
Novelty and saliency in attentional capture by unannounced motion singletons.未预告的运动单一物在注意捕获中的新颖性和显著性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):290-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Jan 5.