Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville (D.K.R., E.J.F.); Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida (D.K.R., D.J.C.); Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida (D.K.R., L.D., E.J.F.); Department of Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville (D.J.C.); and University of North Florida, Jacksonville (P.W.).
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018 Jan;42(1):12-21. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000210.
Strategies to address gait and balance deficits early poststroke are minimal. The postural and motor control requirements of Backward Walking Training (BWT) may provide benefits to improve balance and walking speed in this population. This pilot study (1) determined the feasibility of administering BWT during inpatient rehabilitation and (2) compared the effectiveness of BWT to Standing Balance Training (SBT) on walking speed, balance, and balance-related efficacy in acute stroke.
Eighteen individuals 1-week poststroke were randomized to eight, 30-minute sessions of BWT or SBT in addition to scheduled therapy. Five-Meter Walk Test, 3-Meter Backward Walk Test, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale, Berg Balance Scale, Sensory Organization Test, and Function Independence Measure-Mobility were assessed pre- and postintervention and at 3 months poststroke.
Forward gait speed change (BWT: 0.75 m/s; SBT: 0.41 m/s), assessed by the 5-Meter Walk Test, and backward gait speed change (BWT: 0.53 m/s; SBT: 0.23 m/s), assessed by the 3-Meter Backward Walk Test, preintervention to 1-month retention were greater for BWT than for SBT (P < 0.05). Group difference effect size from preintervention to 1-month retention was large for Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale, moderate for Berg Balance Scale and Function Independence Measure-Mobility, and small for Sensory Organization Test.
Individuals 1-week poststroke tolerated 30 min/d of additional therapy. At 1-month postintervention, BWT resulted in greater improvements in both forward and backward walking speed than SBT. Backward walking training is a feasible important addition to acute stroke rehabilitation. Future areas of inquiry should examine BWT as a preventative modality for future fall incidence.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A193).
针对脑卒中后早期步态和平衡障碍的策略很少。后退行走训练(BWT)的姿势和运动控制要求可能对改善该人群的平衡和行走速度有益。本初步研究(1)确定了在住院康复期间进行 BWT 的可行性,(2)比较了 BWT 与站立平衡训练(SBT)在急性脑卒中患者的行走速度、平衡和与平衡相关的疗效方面的有效性。
18 名脑卒中后 1 周的患者被随机分为 BWT 或 SBT 组,每组进行 8 次,每次 30 分钟,同时接受常规治疗。在干预前、干预后和脑卒中后 3 个月评估 5 米步行测试、3 米后退步行测试、活动特异性平衡信心量表、伯格平衡量表、感觉组织测试和功能独立性测量-移动。
通过 5 米步行测试评估的向前行走速度变化(BWT:0.75 m/s;SBT:0.41 m/s)和通过 3 米后退步行测试评估的向后行走速度变化(BWT:0.53 m/s;SBT:0.23 m/s),BWT 组比 SBT 组在干预前到 1 个月保留期的变化更大(P < 0.05)。从干预前到 1 个月保留期的组间差异效应量在活动特异性平衡信心量表上较大,在伯格平衡量表和功能独立性测量-移动上中等,在感觉组织测试上较小。
脑卒中后 1 周的患者能耐受每天额外 30 分钟的治疗。在干预后 1 个月时,BWT 比 SBT 更能改善向前和向后行走速度。后退行走训练是急性脑卒中康复的一个可行的重要补充。未来的研究领域应将 BWT 作为预防未来跌倒发生率的一种方式进行研究。(见视频,补充数字内容 1,http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A193)