School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Station Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation-Institut Universitaire sur la Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Montréal, in CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'ile-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Jun 17;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00707-0.
Previous studies have assessed the effects of perturbation training on balance after stroke. However, the perturbations were either applied while standing or were small in amplitude during gait, which is not representative of the most common fall conditions. The perturbations were also combined with other challenges such as progressive increases in treadmill speed.
To determine the benefit of treadmill training with intense and unpredictable perturbations compared to treadmill walking-only training for dynamic balance and gait post-stroke.
Twenty-one individuals post-stroke with reduced dynamic balance abilities, with or without a history of fall and ability to walk on a treadmill without external support or a walking aid for at least 1 min were allocated to either an unpredictable gait perturbation (Perturb) group or a walking-only (NonPerturb) group through covariate adaptive randomization. Nine training sessions were conducted over 3 weeks. NonPerturb participants only walked on the treadmill but were offered perturbation training after the control intervention. Pre- and post-training evaluations included balance and gait abilities, maximal knee strength, balance confidence and community integration. Six-week phone follow-ups were conducted for balance confidence and community integration. Satisfaction with perturbation training was also assessed.
With no baseline differences between groups (p > 0.075), perturbation training yielded large improvements in most variables in the Perturb (p < 0.05, Effect Size: ES > .46) group (n = 10) and the NonPerturb (p ≤ .089, ES > .45) group (n = 7 post-crossing), except for maximal strength (p > .23) in the NonPerturb group. Walking-only training in the NonPerturb group (n = 8, pre-crossing) mostly had no effect (p > .292, ES < .26), except on balance confidence (p = .063, ES = .46). The effects of the gait training were still present on balance confidence and community integration at follow-up. Satisfaction with the training program was high.
Intense and unpredictable gait perturbations have the potential to be an efficient component of training to improve balance abilities and community integration in individuals with chronic stroke. Retrospective registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. March 18th, 2020. Identifier: NCT04314830.
先前的研究已经评估了扰动训练对中风后平衡的影响。然而,这些扰动要么是在站立时施加的,要么是在步态时幅度较小,这与最常见的跌倒情况并不相符。这些扰动还与其他挑战相结合,例如跑步机速度的逐渐增加。
确定与仅在跑步机上行走相比,使用高强度和不可预测的扰动进行跑步机训练对中风后动态平衡和步态的益处。
21 名中风后动态平衡能力下降的个体,无论是否有跌倒史,都能够在没有外部支撑或助行器的情况下在跑步机上行走至少 1 分钟,通过协变量自适应随机化分配到不可预测的步态扰动(扰动)组或仅在跑步机上行走的组(非扰动)。在 3 周内进行了 9 次训练。非扰动组仅在跑步机上行走,但在对照干预后提供了扰动训练。在训练前后评估了平衡和步态能力、最大膝关节力量、平衡信心和社区融合。在 6 周时进行电话随访以评估平衡信心和社区融合。还评估了对扰动训练的满意度。
由于两组之间没有基线差异(p>0.075),扰动训练使扰动组(n=10)和非扰动组(n=7 交叉后)的大多数变量都有较大的改善(p<0.05,效应量:ES>0.46),除了非扰动组的最大力量(p>0.23)。非扰动组的仅在跑步机上行走训练(n=8,交叉前)大多没有效果(p>0.292,ES<0.26),除了平衡信心(p=0.063,ES=0.46)。在随访时,步态训练对平衡信心和社区融合的影响仍然存在。对训练计划的满意度很高。
强烈且不可预测的步态扰动有可能成为改善慢性中风患者平衡能力和社区融合的有效训练组成部分。回顾性注册:ClinicalTrials.gov。2020 年 3 月 18 日。标识符:NCT04314830。