Suppr超能文献

在一所药学院的医疗服务课程中,将辩论用作一种主动学习工具。

The use of debates as an active learning tool in a college of pharmacy healthcare delivery course.

作者信息

Peasah Samuel K, Marshall Leisa L

机构信息

Mercer University College of Pharmacy, 3001 Mercer University Drive, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 May;9(3):433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To describe the use of debates, and to evaluate student performance and perceptions, when student debates are incorporated as an active learning tool in a required pharmacy healthcare delivery course.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

Student live debates replaced 15% of a traditional lecture-based course. Twelve healthcare controversies were debated by student teams each year. Student perception of debate utility and opinion on topics, pre- and post-debate, were measured via a voluntary survey. Both peer and instructor's assessments of team performances, as well as individual student performance on the debate-based questions on course exams, contributed to course grade.

FINDINGS

The average survey response rates were 76% (2014) and 86% (2015). Fifteen-54% of student respondents changed their opinion on individual debate topics due to the debates. Although exam performance on debate-based questions was no better than on lecture-based questions, respondents who found the debates useful or very useful in mastering course material increased by 19% post versus pre-debate surveys.

SUMMARY

Debates are an effective active learning tool for engaging students in controversial subjects. Assessment of student performance should include student and instructor evaluations, and can be incorporated into the course grade.

摘要

背景与目的

描述在一门必修的药学医疗服务课程中,将学生辩论作为一种主动学习工具时辩论的使用情况,并评估学生的表现和看法。

教育活动与背景

学生现场辩论取代了传统讲座课程的15%。每年有12个医疗争议话题由学生团队进行辩论。通过一项自愿调查来衡量学生在辩论前后对辩论效用的看法以及对话题的意见。同伴和教师对团队表现的评估,以及学生在课程考试中基于辩论的问题上的个人表现,都计入课程成绩。

研究结果

调查的平均回复率分别为2014年的76%和2015年的86%。15%-54%的学生受访者因辩论而改变了对个别辩论话题的看法。虽然基于辩论的问题在考试中的表现并不比基于讲座的问题好,但认为辩论对掌握课程材料有用或非常有用的受访者在辩论后比辩论前增加了19%。

总结

辩论是让学生参与有争议话题的一种有效的主动学习工具。对学生表现的评估应包括学生和教师的评价,并可纳入课程成绩。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验