Peasah Samuel K, Marshall Leisa L
Mercer University College of Pharmacy, 3001 Mercer University Drive, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 May;9(3):433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
To describe the use of debates, and to evaluate student performance and perceptions, when student debates are incorporated as an active learning tool in a required pharmacy healthcare delivery course.
Student live debates replaced 15% of a traditional lecture-based course. Twelve healthcare controversies were debated by student teams each year. Student perception of debate utility and opinion on topics, pre- and post-debate, were measured via a voluntary survey. Both peer and instructor's assessments of team performances, as well as individual student performance on the debate-based questions on course exams, contributed to course grade.
The average survey response rates were 76% (2014) and 86% (2015). Fifteen-54% of student respondents changed their opinion on individual debate topics due to the debates. Although exam performance on debate-based questions was no better than on lecture-based questions, respondents who found the debates useful or very useful in mastering course material increased by 19% post versus pre-debate surveys.
Debates are an effective active learning tool for engaging students in controversial subjects. Assessment of student performance should include student and instructor evaluations, and can be incorporated into the course grade.
描述在一门必修的药学医疗服务课程中,将学生辩论作为一种主动学习工具时辩论的使用情况,并评估学生的表现和看法。
学生现场辩论取代了传统讲座课程的15%。每年有12个医疗争议话题由学生团队进行辩论。通过一项自愿调查来衡量学生在辩论前后对辩论效用的看法以及对话题的意见。同伴和教师对团队表现的评估,以及学生在课程考试中基于辩论的问题上的个人表现,都计入课程成绩。
调查的平均回复率分别为2014年的76%和2015年的86%。15%-54%的学生受访者因辩论而改变了对个别辩论话题的看法。虽然基于辩论的问题在考试中的表现并不比基于讲座的问题好,但认为辩论对掌握课程材料有用或非常有用的受访者在辩论后比辩论前增加了19%。
辩论是让学生参与有争议话题的一种有效的主动学习工具。对学生表现的评估应包括学生和教师的评价,并可纳入课程成绩。