Chuenjitwongsa S, Oliver R G, Bullock A D
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Biochemistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Wales Deanery, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2018 Aug;22(3):179-191. doi: 10.1111/eje.12306. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
Recent developments in European dental education are student-focused, concerned with competency-based and problem-based learning. The development of dental educators has so far received little consideration. This study aimed to agree curriculum content for developing dental educators so that they are better able to support changing undergraduate dental education.
Adopting consensus methodology, a 2-round Delphi was conducted in 2012. Fifty-three dental educators and 39 dental students across Europe volunteered to take part. The Delphi questionnaire was developed based on literature, piloted and sent to participants to gather opinions and seek consensus on educational content using rating scales and open-ended questions. Numeric data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed thematically.
This study revealed 7 domains of curriculum content for dental educators. Four of these domains were considered essential: educational principles; educational practice in dentistry; curriculum, quality and improvement; and educational professionalism. Three domains were viewed as optional and could be tailored to local needs: educational principles in relation to specific contexts, educational research, and educational and healthcare management. When developing training for dental educators, factors which need consideration were identified as the academic position and teaching experience of educators, and the nature of clinical dental education.
The results are beneficial for individual educators to inform professional development plans; institutions to devise faculty developments; ADEE to inform policies on developing European dental educators; and other disciplines to inform training for their educators.
欧洲牙科教育的最新发展以学生为中心,关注基于能力和问题的学习。到目前为止,牙科教育工作者的发展很少受到关注。本研究旨在就牙科教育工作者的课程内容达成共识,以便他们能够更好地支持本科牙科教育的变革。
采用共识方法,于2012年进行了两轮德尔菲法。来自欧洲各地的53名牙科教育工作者和39名牙科学生自愿参与。德尔菲问卷是根据文献编制的,经过试点后发送给参与者,以通过评分量表和开放式问题收集意见并就教育内容达成共识。对数值数据进行描述性统计分析,对定性数据进行主题分析。
本研究揭示了牙科教育工作者课程内容的7个领域。其中4个领域被认为是必不可少的:教育原则;牙科教育实践;课程、质量与改进;以及教育专业精神。3个领域被视为可选领域,可以根据当地需求进行调整:特定背景下的教育原则、教育研究以及教育与医疗管理。在为牙科教育工作者制定培训计划时,需要考虑的因素包括教育工作者的学术地位和教学经验,以及临床牙科教育的性质。
这些结果有助于个体教育工作者制定专业发展计划;有助于院校设计师资发展计划;有助于欧洲牙科教育协会制定有关欧洲牙科教育工作者发展的政策;也有助于其他学科为其教育工作者的培训提供参考。