• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院获得性压力性损伤:综合医疗服务体系中的风险调整比较

Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury: Risk-Adjusted Comparisons in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System.

作者信息

Rondinelli June, Zuniga Stephen, Kipnis Patricia, Kawar Lina Najib, Liu Vincent, Escobar Gabriel J

机构信息

June Rondinelli, PhD, RN, CNS, is Nurse Scientist and Interim Director, Regional Nursing Research Program, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California, Pasadena. Stephen Zuniga, PhD, is Biostatistician II, Clinical Intelligence and Decision Support, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Pasadena, California. Patricia Kipnis, PhD, is Principal Statistician/Associate Director, Decision Support, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Oakland, California. Lina Najib Kawar, PhD, RN, CNS, is Nurse Scientist, Regional Nursing Research Program, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California, Pasadena. Vincent Liu, MD, MS, is Research Scientist, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California. Gabriel J. Escobar, MD, is Research Scientist III, Regional Director for Hospital Operations Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2018 Jan/Feb;67(1):16-25. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000258.

DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000258
PMID:29240656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6013055/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although healthcare organizations have decreased hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) rates, HAPIs are not eliminated, driving further examination in both nursing and health services research.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to describe HAPI incidence, risk factors, and risk-adjusted hospital variation within a California integrated healthcare system.

METHODS

Inpatient episodes were included in this retrospective cohort if patients were hospitalized between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2015. The primary outcome was development of a HAPI over time. Predictors included cited HAPI risk factors in addition to incorporation of a longitudinal comorbidity burden (Comorbidity Point Score, Version 2 [COPS2]), a severity-of-illness score (Laboratory-Based Acute Physiology Score, Version 2 [LAPS2]), and the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk.

RESULTS

Analyses included HAPI inpatient episodes (n = 1661) and non-HAPI episodes (n = 726,605). HAPI incidence was 0.57 per 1,000 patient days (95% CI [0.019, 3.805]) and 0.2% of episodes. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed significant (p < .001) hazard ratios (HRs) for the change from the 25th to the 75th percentile for age (HR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.25, 1.45]), higher COPS2 scores (HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.04, 1.16]), and higher LAPS2 scores (HR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.28, 1.50]). Female gender, an emergency room admission for a medical reason, and higher Braden scores showed significant protective HRs (HR < 1.00, p < .001). After risk adjustment, significant variation remained among the 35 hospitals.

DISCUSSION

Results prompt the consideration of age, severity of illness (LAPS2), comorbidity indexes (COPS2), and the Braden score as important predictors for HAPI risk. HAPI rates may be low; however, because of significant individual site variation, HAPIs remain an area to explore through both research and quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

背景

尽管医疗机构已降低了医院获得性压力性损伤(HAPI)的发生率,但HAPI并未消除,这促使护理和卫生服务研究领域进行进一步的调查。

目的

目的是描述加利福尼亚州一个综合医疗系统内的HAPI发生率、风险因素以及风险调整后的医院差异。

方法

如果患者在2013年1月1日至2015年6月30日期间住院,则将住院病例纳入该回顾性队列研究。主要结局是随时间推移发生HAPI。预测因素包括引用的HAPI风险因素,以及纳入纵向合并症负担(合并症评分系统第2版[COPS2])、疾病严重程度评分(基于实验室的急性生理学评分第2版[LAPS2])和预测压疮风险的Braden量表。

结果

分析包括HAPI住院病例(n = 1661)和非HAPI病例(n = 726,605)。HAPI发生率为每1000患者日0.57例(95%可信区间[0.019, 3.805]),占病例数的0.2%。多变量Cox比例风险模型显示年龄从第25百分位数到第75百分位数变化的风险比(HR)显著(p <.001)(HR = 1.36, 95%可信区间[1.25, 1.45])、COPS2评分较高(HR = 1.10, 95%可信区间[1.04, 1.16])以及LAPS2评分较高(HR = 1.38, 95%可信区间[1.28, 1.50])。女性、因医疗原因急诊入院以及较高的Braden评分显示出显著的保护HR(HR < 1.00, p <.001)。在进行风险调整后,35家医院之间仍存在显著差异。

讨论

结果促使人们考虑年龄、疾病严重程度(LAPS2)、合并症指数(COPS2)和Braden评分作为HAPI风险的重要预测因素。HAPI发生率可能较低;然而,由于各医院之间存在显著差异,HAPI仍然是一个需要通过研究和质量改进举措进行探索的领域。

相似文献

1
Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury: Risk-Adjusted Comparisons in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System.医院获得性压力性损伤:综合医疗服务体系中的风险调整比较
Nurs Res. 2018 Jan/Feb;67(1):16-25. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000258.
2
All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.并非所有高危患者都一样:分析布雷登压疮风险评分以识别特定风险。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):282-91. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182435715.
3
Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries and Acute Skin Failure in Critical Care: A Case-Control Study.重症监护中的医院获得性压力性损伤和急性皮肤衰竭:病例对照研究。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48(1):20-30. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000734.
4
Risk Adjustment for Hospital Characteristics Reduces Unexplained Hospital Variation in Pressure Injury Risk.针对医院特征进行风险调整可减少压力性损伤风险中无法解释的医院差异。
Nurs Res. 2018 Jul/Aug;67(4):314-323. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000287.
5
Assessment of Risk Factors Associated With Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries and Impact on Health Care Utilization and Cost Outcomes in US Hospitals.美国医院中与医院获得性压力性损伤相关的危险因素评估及其对医疗保健利用和成本结果的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jul;33(4):348-358. doi: 10.1177/1062860617746741. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
Use of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in a community hospital setting: the role of total score and individual subscale scores in triggering preventive interventions.在社区医院环境中使用Braden量表进行压疮风险评估:总分及各子量表得分在触发预防干预措施中的作用
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;41(6):535-8. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000066.
7
Performance of a Commonly Used Pressure Injury Risk Model Under Changing Incidence.常用压力性损伤风险模型在发病变化下的表现。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 Mar;48(3):131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
8
An Integrated System of Braden Scale and Random Forest Using Real-Time Diagnoses to Predict When Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries (Bedsores) Occur.基于实时诊断的Braden 量表和随机森林集成系统预测医院获得性压疮(褥疮)的发生时间。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4911. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064911.
9
Costs and consequences of an intervention-based program to reduce hospital-acquired pressure injuries in one health district in Australia.澳大利亚一个卫生区实施的基于干预措施的项目,以减少医院获得性压疮的成本和后果。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Oct;43(5):516-525. doi: 10.1071/AH18131.
10
Validation of a Model for Predicting Pressure Injury Risk in Patients With Vascular Diseases.血管疾病患者压力性损伤风险预测模型的验证
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Mar/Apr;44(2):118-122. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000305.

引用本文的文献

1
Pressure Injury Prediction in Intensive Care Units Using Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.使用人工智能预测重症监护病房中的压力性损伤:一项范围综述。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(4):126. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15040126.
2
A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and other best practice recommendations for pressure injury risk assessment in the United States.对美国压力性损伤风险评估的临床实践指南及其他最佳实践建议的系统评价。
Wound Repair Regen. 2025 Mar-Apr;33(2):e70016. doi: 10.1111/wrr.70016.
3
Mechanism exploration of SanShi ShengXin Ointment in the treatment of pressure ulcers based on network pharmacology and molecular docking.基于网络药理学和分子对接技术探讨三十生新软膏治疗压疮的作用机制。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 1;103(9):e37390. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037390.
4
Prevalence of pressure injury on the medical wards of public general hospitals in Kuwait: a national cross-sectional study.科威特公立综合医院内科病房压力性损伤的患病率:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10615-x.
5
Sustaining a culture of safety and optimising patient outcomes while implementing zero harm programme: a 2-year project of the nursing services - SBAHC.在实施零伤害计划的同时,维持安全文化和优化患者结局:护理服务-SBAHC 的为期 2 年的项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002063.
6
Systematic Review for Risks of Pressure Injury and Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法对压力性损伤风险和预测模型的系统评价。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;13(17):2739. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172739.
7
Risk predictions of hospital-acquired pressure injury in the intensive care unit based on a machine learning algorithm.基于机器学习算法的重症监护病房医院获得性压力性损伤风险预测。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3768-3775. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14275. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
8
Clinical Coders' Perspectives on Pressure Injury Coding in Acute Care Services in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州急性护理服务中临床编码员对压力性损伤编码的看法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;10:893482. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.893482. eCollection 2022.
9
Risk Factors for Pressure Injuries in Adult Patients: A Narrative Synthesis.成人压力性损伤的危险因素:叙事性综合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020761.
10
Association of ICU Admission and Outcomes in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure.脓毒症和急性呼吸衰竭患者 ICU 入住与结局的相关性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;205(5):520-528. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202106-1350OC.

本文引用的文献

1
Piloting electronic medical record-based early detection of inpatient deterioration in community hospitals.在社区医院试点基于电子病历的住院患者病情恶化早期检测。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Nov;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18-S24. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2652.
2
A Model of Pressure, Oxygenation, and Perfusion Risk Factors for Pressure Ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房压力性溃疡的压力、氧合和灌注风险因素模型
Am J Crit Care. 2016 Mar;25(2):156-64. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2016840.
3
Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks.存在竞争风险时生存数据的分析导论
Circulation. 2016 Feb 9;133(6):601-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719.
4
Nonelective Rehospitalizations and Postdischarge Mortality: Predictive Models Suitable for Use in Real Time.非选择性再入院和出院后死亡率:适用于实时使用的预测模型。
Med Care. 2015 Nov;53(11):916-23. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000435.
5
Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers at Academic Medical Centers in the United States, 2008-2012: Tracking Changes Since the CMS Nonpayment Policy.2008 - 2012年美国学术医疗中心的医院获得性压疮:追踪自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)不支付政策实施以来的变化
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Jun;41(6):257-63. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41035-9.
6
Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers - a population-based cohort study.医院获得性压疮的发病率——一项基于人群的队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):809-20. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12386. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Exploring factors associated with pressure ulcers: a data mining approach.探索与压疮相关的因素:一种数据挖掘方法。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
8
A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework.一个新的压疮概念框架。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Oct;70(10):2222-34. doi: 10.1111/jan.12405. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
9
Under pressure: nursing interventions help prevent HAPUs.面临压力:护理干预有助于预防医院获得性压力性损伤。
Nurs Manage. 2014 Apr;45(4):36-43. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000444876.62569.51.
10
Reducing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a quality improvement project across 21 hospitals.减少医院获得性压疮:一项涉及21家医院的质量改进项目。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2014 Oct-Dec;29(4):303-10. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000060.