• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性照顾者与参与儿童破坏性行为障碍家庭强化计划。

Male Caregivers and Engagement in a Family Strengthening Program for Child Disruptive Behavior Disorders.

机构信息

Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, Room# 7-308, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2022 Nov;58(8):1513-1521. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-00966-2. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-022-00966-2
PMID:35362804
Abstract

Awareness and interest in involving male caregivers in child mental health treatment has grown, especially for youth with disruptive behavior disorders like oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between male caregiver involvement and treatment engagement for child ODD. Children (n = 122) ages 7-11 and their caregivers participated in the 4 Rs 2 Ss Strengthening Families Program for child-onset ODD. Families were compared based on male caregiver presence. Families with a male caregiver were significantly more resourced with respect to income, educational status, and food security. Additionally, they were over three times less likely to drop out of the program than those without a male caregiver. The presence of a male caregiver was associated with increased resources and higher rates of engagement in services than single, female-headed families. Future research is needed to discern the underlying mechanisms of this association.

摘要

人们越来越意识到让男性照顾者参与儿童心理健康治疗的重要性,尤其是对于患有破坏性行为障碍(如对立违抗性障碍(ODD))的青少年。本研究旨在探讨男性照顾者参与程度与儿童 ODD 治疗参与度之间的关系。年龄在 7-11 岁的儿童及其照顾者参加了针对儿童发病的 ODD 的 4 Rs 2 Ss 强化家庭计划。根据男性照顾者的存在对家庭进行了比较。有男性照顾者的家庭在收入、教育程度和粮食安全方面的资源明显更为丰富。此外,与没有男性照顾者的家庭相比,他们退出该计划的可能性要低三分之二以上。男性照顾者的存在与资源的增加以及服务参与度的提高有关,而单身女性家庭则不然。需要进一步的研究来阐明这种关联的潜在机制。

相似文献

1
Male Caregivers and Engagement in a Family Strengthening Program for Child Disruptive Behavior Disorders.男性照顾者与参与儿童破坏性行为障碍家庭强化计划。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Nov;58(8):1513-1521. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-00966-2. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
Testing the 4Rs and 2Ss Multiple Family Group intervention: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.测试4R和2S多家庭小组干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 4;18(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2331-7.
3
Developing a Multiple Caregiver Group for Caregivers of Adolescents With Disruptive Behaviors.为有破坏性行为的青少年的照顾者组建多照顾者小组。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Dec;31(6):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
4
Caregivers' distress: youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid disorders assessed via telemental health.照料者的困扰:通过远程心理健康评估患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍及共病的青少年。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013 Aug;23(6):379-85. doi: 10.1089/cap.2013.0019.
5
[Intrafamilial disruptive behaviour disorders in children and adolescents: Present data and treatment prospects].[儿童和青少年的家族内破坏性行为障碍:当前数据与治疗前景]
Encephale. 2018 Apr;44(2):176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
6
Bifactor latent structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)/oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms and first-order latent structure of sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms.注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)/对立违抗性障碍(ODD)症状的双因素潜在结构及认知迟缓症状的一阶潜在结构。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Aug;28(8):917-28. doi: 10.1037/pas0000232. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Technology-enhanced program for child disruptive behavior disorders: development and pilot randomized control trial.针对儿童破坏性行为障碍的技术强化项目:开发与试点随机对照试验
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(1):88-101. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.822308. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
8
The challenges for primary caregivers of adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders.患有破坏性行为障碍青少年的主要照顾者所面临的挑战。
J Fam Nurs. 2015 Feb;21(1):149-67. doi: 10.1177/1074840714562027. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
9
Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder in a Community Mental Health Clinic: Prevalence, Comorbidity and Correlates.社区心理健康诊所中的破坏性情绪失调障碍:患病率、共病情况及相关因素
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Mar;26(2):123-30. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0061. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
Technology-Assisted Parent Training Programs for Children and Adolescents With Disruptive Behaviors: A Systematic Review.针对有破坏性行为的儿童和青少年的技术辅助家长培训项目:一项系统综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Sep/Oct;78(8):e957-e969. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16r11063.

引用本文的文献

1
Parent Explanatory Model Personalization as a Method of Reducing Risk for Poor Engagement and Outcomes in PCIT among Culturally Diverse Families.将家长解释模型个性化作为一种降低文化多元家庭中亲子互动治疗参与度低和治疗效果差风险的方法。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 17;13(12):3541. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123541.
2
Intervention and Implementation Characteristics to Enhance Father Engagement: A Systematic Review of Parenting Interventions.促进父亲参与的干预和实施特点:育儿干预的系统评价
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Jun;26(2):445-458. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00430-x. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing and evaluating a lay health worker delivered implementation intervention to decrease engagement disparities in behavioural parent training: a mixed methods study protocol.制定并评估由非专业卫生工作者实施的干预措施,以减少行为家长培训中参与度的差异:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 18;9(7):e028988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028988.
2
Predicting Dropout from Children's Mental Health Services: Using a Need-Based Definition of Dropout.预测儿童心理健康服务中的辍学率:使用辍学的基于需求的定义。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020 Feb;51(1):13-26. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00906-4.
3
Dual Versus Single Parental Households and Differences in Maternal Mental Health and Child's Overweight/Obesity.
双亲家庭与单亲家庭以及母亲心理健康和儿童超重/肥胖的差异
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Apr;23(4):547-556. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2671-2.
4
Multiple family group service delivery model for children with disruptive behavior disorders: Impact on caregiver stress and depressive symptoms.针对患有破坏性行为障碍儿童的多家庭小组服务提供模式:对照顾者压力和抑郁症状的影响。
J Emot Behav Disord. 2018 Sep;26(3):182-192. doi: 10.1177/1063426617717721. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
5
The intersection of extreme poverty and familial mental health in the United States.美国极端贫困与家庭心理健康的交叉点。
Soc Work Ment Health. 2017;15(6):677-689. doi: 10.1080/15332985.2017.1319893. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
6
Dimensional Latent Structure of Early Disruptive Behavior Disorders: A Taxometric Analysis in Preschoolers.学龄前儿童早期破坏性行为障碍的维度潜结构:一种分类型分析。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Oct;46(7):1385-1394. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0383-5.
7
Mortality in individuals with disruptive behavior disorders diagnosed by specialist services - A nationwide cohort study.专科医疗机构诊断的破坏性行为障碍患者的死亡率:一项全国性队列研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 May;251:255-260. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
8
Improving Mental Health Access for Low-Income Children and Families in the Primary Care Setting.改善初级保健环境中低收入儿童及其家庭获得心理健康服务的机会。
Pediatrics. 2017 Jan;139(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1175. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
9
Multiple Family Groups to reduce child disruptive behavior difficulties: moderating effects of child welfare status on child outcomes.多家庭小组以减少儿童破坏性行为问题:儿童福利状况对儿童结局的调节作用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Aug;46:207-19. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
Trajectories of fathers' psychological distress across the early parenting period: Implications for parenting.父亲在育儿早期心理困扰的轨迹:对育儿的启示。
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Oct;29(5):766-76. doi: 10.1037/fam0000109. Epub 2015 Jun 29.