Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3015, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 15;12(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0684-7.
Informed by our prior work indicating that therapists do not feel recognized or rewarded for implementation of evidence-based practices, we tested the feasibility and acceptability of two incentive-based implementation strategies that seek to improve therapist adherence to cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth, an evidence-based practice.
This study was conducted over 6 weeks in two community mental health agencies with therapists (n = 11) and leaders (n = 4). Therapists were randomized to receive either a financial or social incentive if they achieved a predetermined criterion on adherence to cognitive-behavioral therapy. In the first intervention period (block 1; 2 weeks), therapists received the reward they were initially randomized to if they achieved criterion. In the second intervention period (block 2; 2 weeks), therapists received both rewards if they achieved criterion. Therapists recorded 41 sessions across 15 unique clients over the project period. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability. Feasibility was assessed quantitatively. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with therapists and leaders to assess acceptability. Difference in therapist adherence by condition was examined as an exploratory outcome. Adherence ratings were ascertained using an established and validated observational coding system of cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Both implementation strategies were feasible and acceptable-however, modifications to study design for the larger trial will be necessary based on participant feedback. With respect to our exploratory analysis, we found a trend suggesting the financial reward may have had a more robust effect on therapist adherence than the social reward.
Incentive-based implementation strategies can be feasibly administered in community mental health agencies with good acceptability, although iterative pilot work is essential. Larger, fully powered trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of implementation strategies to incentivize and enhance therapists' adherence to evidence-based practices such as cognitive-behavioral therapy.
根据我们之前的工作表明,治疗师在实施基于证据的实践时并没有感到得到认可或奖励,我们测试了两种基于激励的实施策略的可行性和可接受性,这些策略旨在提高治疗师对青少年认知行为疗法的依从性,这是一种基于证据的实践。
这项研究在两个社区心理健康机构中进行,参与者包括治疗师(n=11)和领导(n=4),持续了 6 周。如果治疗师达到了认知行为疗法依从性的预定标准,他们就有机会获得财务或社交奖励。在第一个干预阶段(第 1 块;2 周),如果达到标准,治疗师会获得他们最初随机分配的奖励。在第二个干预阶段(第 2 块;2 周),如果达到标准,治疗师会同时获得两种奖励。在项目期间,治疗师记录了 15 个独特客户的 41 次治疗过程。主要结果包括可行性和可接受性。可行性通过定量评估进行评估。对治疗师和领导进行了 15 次半结构化访谈,以评估可接受性。根据条件分析了治疗师依从性的差异,作为探索性结果。使用已建立和验证的认知行为疗法观察性编码系统来确定依从性评分。
两种实施策略都是可行和可接受的——然而,根据参与者的反馈,需要对更大规模试验的研究设计进行修改。就我们的探索性分析而言,我们发现一种趋势表明,财务奖励对治疗师依从性的影响可能比社交奖励更为显著。
基于激励的实施策略可以在社区心理健康机构中可行地实施,并且具有很好的可接受性,尽管需要进行迭代性的试点工作。需要进行更大规模的、完全有效的试验,以比较激励和增强治疗师对基于证据的实践(如认知行为疗法)的依从性的实施策略的有效性。