Beidas Rinad S, Maclean Johanna Catherine, Fishman Jessica, Dorsey Shannon, Schoenwald Sonja K, Mandell David S, Shea Judy A, McLeod Bryce D, French Michael T, Hogue Aaron, Adams Danielle R, Lieberman Adina, Becker-Haimes Emily M, Marcus Steven C
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Department of Economics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1034-z.
This randomized trial will compare three methods of assessing fidelity to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for youth to identify the most accurate and cost-effective method. The three methods include self-report (i.e., therapist completes a self-report measure on the CBT interventions used in session while circumventing some of the typical barriers to self-report), chart-stimulated recall (i.e., therapist reports on the CBT interventions used in session via an interview with a trained rater, and with the chart to assist him/her) and behavioral rehearsal (i.e., therapist demonstrates the CBT interventions used in session via a role-play with a trained rater). Direct observation will be used as the gold-standard comparison for each of the three methods.
METHODS/DESIGN: This trial will recruit 135 therapists in approximately 12 community agencies in the City of Philadelphia. Therapists will be randomized to one of the three conditions. Each therapist will provide data from three unique sessions, for a total of 405 sessions. All sessions will be audio-recorded and coded using the Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy-Revised Strategies scale. This will enable comparison of each measurement approach to direct observation of therapist session behavior to determine which most accurately assesses fidelity. Cost data associated with each method will be gathered. To gather stakeholder perspectives of each measurement method, we will use purposive sampling to recruit 12 therapists from each condition (total of 36 therapists) and 12 supervisors to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews.
Results will provide needed information on how to accurately and cost-effectively measure therapist fidelity to CBT for youth, as well as important information about stakeholder perspectives with regard to each measurement method. Findings will inform fidelity measurement practices in future implementation studies as well as in clinical practice.
NCT02820623 , June 3rd, 2016.
这项随机试验将比较三种评估针对青少年的认知行为疗法(CBT)保真度的方法,以确定最准确且最具成本效益的方法。这三种方法包括自我报告(即治疗师在回避一些自我报告的典型障碍的同时,就 session 中使用的 CBT 干预措施完成一份自我报告量表)、图表刺激回忆(即治疗师通过与一名经过培训的评估者进行访谈,并借助图表来协助,报告 session 中使用的 CBT 干预措施)和行为演练(即治疗师通过与一名经过培训的评估者进行角色扮演,演示 session 中使用的 CBT 干预措施)。直接观察将用作这三种方法中每种方法的金标准对照。
方法/设计:本试验将在费城约 12 个社区机构招募 135 名治疗师。治疗师将被随机分配到三种情况之一。每位治疗师将提供来自三个不同 session 的数据,总共 405 个 session。所有 session 将进行音频录制,并使用儿童心理治疗修订策略量表的治疗过程观察编码系统进行编码。这将能够比较每种测量方法与对治疗师 session 行为的直接观察,以确定哪种方法最准确地评估保真度。将收集与每种方法相关的成本数据。为了收集利益相关者对每种测量方法的看法,我们将采用目的抽样从每种情况中招募 12 名治疗师(共 36 名治疗师)和 12 名督导参与半结构化定性访谈。
结果将提供有关如何准确且经济高效地测量治疗师对青少年 CBT 的保真度的所需信息,以及有关利益相关者对每种测量方法看法的重要信息。研究结果将为未来实施研究以及临床实践中的保真度测量实践提供参考。
NCT02820623, 2016 年 6 月 3 日 。