Snodgrass M, Lynn S J
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1989 Jan;37(1):41-54. doi: 10.1080/00207148908410532.
The present study investigated differences between high (N = 15), medium (N = 20), and low (N = 16) hypnotizable Ss' involvement in imaginative versus nonimaginative music. Ss were first screened for hypnotizability with the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (Shor & E. Orne, 1962). In a second session presented as a study of music appreciation, Ss listened to classical music of high and low rated music imaginativeness. Ss' involvement was indexed by absorption, imagery elaboration reported in open-ended essays, and reaction time to a pure tone. High hypnotizable Ss reported more absorption than low hypnotizable Ss, regardless of the imaginativeness level of the music. Ss reported more imagery elaboration in the imaginative than in the low imaginative passages. High hypnotizable Ss tended to differ in their imagery elaboration in response to the imaginative passages but not in response to the nonimaginative passages. Reaction time results were nonsignificant. No sex differences were found. Medium hypnotizable Ss were indistinguishable from both high and low hypnotizable Ss. The findings are generally compatible with J. R. Hilgard's (1970, 1974) construct of imaginative involvement.
本研究调查了高催眠易感性组(N = 15)、中等催眠易感性组(N = 20)和低催眠易感性组(N = 16)的受试者在想象性音乐与非想象性音乐中的参与度差异。首先使用哈佛团体催眠易感性量表A式(Shor & E. Orne,1962)对受试者的催眠易感性进行筛查。在作为音乐欣赏研究的第二阶段,受试者聆听了高想象性和低想象性的古典音乐。受试者的参与度通过专注度、开放式短文中报告的意象 elaboration以及对纯音的反应时间来衡量。无论音乐的想象性水平如何,高催眠易感性的受试者报告的专注度都比低催眠易感性的受试者更高。受试者在想象性段落中报告的意象 elaboration比在低想象性段落中更多。高催眠易感性的受试者在对想象性段落的反应中意象 elaboration往往存在差异,但对非想象性段落的反应中则没有差异。反应时间结果不显著。未发现性别差异。中等催眠易感性的受试者与高催眠易感性和低催眠易感性的受试者没有区别。这些发现总体上与J. R. 希尔加德(1970, 1974)的想象性参与构想相符。
“imagery elaboration”这里不太明确准确意思,暂保留英文未翻译。