• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在简短的二手烟干预中指导创建无烟家庭。

Coaching to create a smoke-free home in a brief secondhand smoke intervention.

作者信息

Escoffery Cam, Mullen Patricia, Genkin Brooke, Bundy Lucja, Owolabi Shade, Haardörfer Regine, Williams Rebecca, Savas Lara, Kegler Michelle

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):555-568. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx072.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyx072
PMID:29253133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5914313/
Abstract

Few community interventions exist to reduce secondhand exposure to tobacco smoke in the home. This study presents the coaching process of a larger intervention to promote smoke-free homes across an efficacy and 2 effectiveness trials. It furthers assesses the coaching call's reach and participants' satisfaction with the call across three intervention sites. The sources of the data were from baseline and 3-month follow-up surveys, coaching forms or online tracking system and interviews with coaches. Reach for the coaching call across trials was fairly high from 72% to 92%. Overall, the majority of participants were highly satisfied with the intervention (M = 3.76) and found it useful in creating a smoke-free home (M = 3.63). Common goals set were changing the environment to support a home smoking ban (e.g. putting up signs, removing ashtrays) (82%) or picking a date (60%). Challenges to a smoke-free home were consistent with other literature on barriers related to household smoking restrictions, including need for assistance in quitting, outside weather and smokers who do not want to quit. Additional research is needed to explore differential reach and reactions to the coaching call as it is disseminated and the impact of coaching call on the outcome of a smoke-free home.

摘要

几乎没有社区干预措施来减少家庭中的二手烟暴露。本研究展示了一项规模更大的干预措施的指导过程,该干预措施在一项效能试验和两项效果试验中推广无烟家庭。它进一步评估了指导电话的覆盖范围以及三个干预地点的参与者对该电话的满意度。数据来源包括基线调查和3个月随访调查、指导表格或在线跟踪系统以及对指导人员的访谈。各试验中指导电话的覆盖范围相当高,从72%到92%。总体而言,大多数参与者对干预措施高度满意(M = 3.76),并认为它有助于创建无烟家庭(M = 3.63)。设定的共同目标包括改变环境以支持家庭禁烟(例如张贴标志、移除烟灰缸)(82%)或确定一个日期(60%)。无烟家庭面临的挑战与其他关于家庭吸烟限制相关障碍的文献一致,包括戒烟需要帮助、室外天气以及不想戒烟的吸烟者。随着指导电话的传播,需要进行更多研究来探索其不同的覆盖范围和反应,以及指导电话对无烟家庭结果的影响。

相似文献

1
Coaching to create a smoke-free home in a brief secondhand smoke intervention.在简短的二手烟干预中指导创建无烟家庭。
Health Educ Res. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):555-568. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx072.
2
Formative research on creating smoke-free homes in rural communities.关于在农村社区创建无烟家庭的形成性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2009 Feb;24(1):76-86. doi: 10.1093/her/cym095. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
3
Disseminating a Smoke-free Homes Program to Low Socioeconomic Status Households in the United States Through 2-1-1: Results of a National Impact Evaluation.通过 2-1-1 向美国社会经济地位较低的家庭传播无烟家庭计划:全国影响评估结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 17;22(4):498-505. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty256.
4
A minimal intervention to promote smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: a randomized controlled trial.一项促进2-1-1热线来电者家庭无烟的最小干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):530-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302260. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
5
Clearing the Air: Smoke-Free Housing Policies, Smoking, and Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Affordable Housing Residents in Minnesota, 2014-2015.净化空气:2014 - 2015年明尼苏达州经济适用房居民的无烟住房政策、吸烟与二手烟暴露情况
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Aug 18;13:E111. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160195.
6
The smoke-free home study: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial of a smoke-free home intervention in permanent supportive housing.无烟家庭研究:一项在永久性支持性住房中实施无烟家庭干预的集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):2076. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14423-y.
7
The role of home smoking bans in limiting exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke in Hungary.匈牙利家庭禁烟令在限制二手烟暴露中的作用。
Health Educ Res. 2013 Feb;28(1):130-40. doi: 10.1093/her/cys057. Epub 2012 May 30.
8
Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Multifaceted Intervention Pilot.无烟家庭干预在永久性支持性住房中的应用:一项多方面干预试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa043.
9
Smoking restrictions in homes after implementation of a smoking ban in public places.在公共场所实施禁烟令后家庭中的吸烟限制。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jan;17(1):41-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu125. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
10
Minimal intervention delivered by 2-1-1 information and referral specialists promotes smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: a Texas generalisation trial.由2-1-1信息与转介专员提供的最低限度干预措施,促进了2-1-1热线来电者家中无烟:一项德克萨斯州的推广试验。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i10-i18. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053045.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding population-level interventions to help more low-income smokers quit: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.扩大人群干预措施以帮助更多低收入吸烟者戒烟:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jun;129:107202. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107202. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
The effects of community participation program on smoke-free homes in a suburban community of Thailand.社区参与计划对泰国一个郊区社区无烟家庭的影响。
Tob Induc Dis. 2021 May 10;19:35. doi: 10.18332/tid/133876. eCollection 2021.
3
Opportunities for Tailored Support to Implement Smoke-Free Homes: A Qualitative Study among Lower Socioeconomic Status Parents.为实施无烟家庭提供定制支持的机会:社会经济地位较低的父母群体中的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 27;17(1):222. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010222.
4
Steps Toward Scalability: Illustrations From a Smoke-Free Homes Program.迈向可扩展性的步骤:无烟家庭计划实例
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;46(5):773-781. doi: 10.1177/1090198119848767. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
5
Impact of changes in home smoking bans on tobacco cessation among quitline callers.家中禁烟令变化对戒烟热线来电者戒烟的影响。
Health Educ Res. 2019 Jun 1;34(3):345-355. doi: 10.1093/her/cyz008.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce children's exposure to secondhand smoke in the home.一项旨在减少儿童在家中接触二手烟的复杂干预措施的随机对照试验。
Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):155-162. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053279. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
2
A Minimal Intervention to Promote Smoke-Free Homes among 2-1-1 Callers: North Carolina Randomized Effectiveness Trial.一项针对 211 热线来电者促进无烟家庭的最小干预措施:北卡罗来纳州随机有效性试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 2;11(11):e0165086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165086. eCollection 2016.
3
A Qualitative Study Among Mexican Americans to Understand Factors Influencing the Adoption and Enforcement of Home Smoking Bans.墨西哥裔美国人定性研究,以了解影响家庭禁烟令采用和执行的因素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Nov 7;19(12):1465-1472. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw270.
4
Minimal intervention delivered by 2-1-1 information and referral specialists promotes smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: a Texas generalisation trial.由2-1-1信息与转介专员提供的最低限度干预措施,促进了2-1-1热线来电者家中无烟:一项德克萨斯州的推广试验。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i10-i18. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053045.
5
Smoke-free homes: what are the barriers, motivators and enablers? A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.无烟家庭:有哪些障碍、动机因素和促进因素?一项定性系统评价与主题综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e010260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010260.
6
Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Tobacco Smoke Pollution in Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.减少家庭烟草烟雾污染干预措施的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 18;12(12):16043-59. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121215038.
7
National and state prevalence of smoke-free rules in homes with and without children and smokers: Two decades of progress.有孩子和吸烟者家庭与无孩子和吸烟者家庭中无烟规定的全国及各州流行情况:二十年的进展。
Prev Med. 2016 Jan;82:51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach.行为改变方法的分类:一种干预映射方法。
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):297-312. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
9
Vital signs: disparities in nonsmokers' exposure to secondhand smoke--United States, 1999-2012.生命体征:1999-2012 年美国不吸烟人群二手烟暴露的差异。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Feb 6;64(4):103-8.
10
A minimal intervention to promote smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: a randomized controlled trial.一项促进2-1-1热线来电者家庭无烟的最小干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):530-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302260. Epub 2015 Jan 20.