• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为实施无烟家庭提供定制支持的机会:社会经济地位较低的父母群体中的定性研究。

Opportunities for Tailored Support to Implement Smoke-Free Homes: A Qualitative Study among Lower Socioeconomic Status Parents.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Public Health, Public Health Service Kennemerland, Zijlweg 200, 2015 CK Haarlem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 27;17(1):222. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010222.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17010222
PMID:31892269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6981932/
Abstract

With the aim of preventing children from being exposed to secondhand smoke, we examined to which level lower socio-economic status (SES) households had implemented home smoking rules and the factors that hampered parents in their process of change toward a complete smoke-free home (SFH). We conducted a qualitative study including semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 parents of young children living in a lower SES neighborhood of a provincial town in the Netherlands. Interview transcripts were subjected to a qualitative content analysis. Three distinct levels of SFH implementation emerged: complete SFH, flexible SFH, and partial SFH. Differences between parents at these three levels essentially concerned: (1) the role of child-related moral considerations in their motivation for an SFH; (2) whether they felt they had the agency to set and enforce home smoking rules; (3) the difficulties they experienced in changing their smoking habit from smoking indoors to smoking outdoors. Parents also had different opinions about the role their children could play in facilitating the parental process of change. We conclude that the current level of SFH implementation may serve as a starting point for developing tailored interventions. Such interventions should probably address other factors than the commonly used awareness-knowledge-commitment approach.

摘要

为了防止儿童接触二手烟,我们研究了社会经济地位(SES)较低的家庭在多大程度上实施了家庭吸烟规定,以及哪些因素阻碍了父母将家庭完全禁烟(SFH)的过程。我们进行了一项定性研究,包括对 14 名居住在荷兰一个省级城镇 SES 较低社区的幼儿家长进行半结构化深入访谈。访谈记录进行了定性内容分析。出现了三种不同水平的 SFH 实施:完全 SFH、灵活 SFH 和部分 SFH。处于这三个水平的父母之间的差异主要涉及:(1)与孩子相关的道德考虑在其 SFH 动机中的作用;(2)他们是否认为自己有能力制定和执行家庭吸烟规定;(3)他们在将吸烟习惯从室内吸烟改为室外吸烟时所经历的困难。父母们对孩子在促进父母改变过程中可以发挥的作用也有不同的看法。我们得出结论,当前 SFH 的实施水平可以作为制定定制干预措施的起点。这些干预措施可能需要解决比常用的意识-知识-承诺方法更广泛的因素。

相似文献

1
Opportunities for Tailored Support to Implement Smoke-Free Homes: A Qualitative Study among Lower Socioeconomic Status Parents.为实施无烟家庭提供定制支持的机会:社会经济地位较低的父母群体中的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 27;17(1):222. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010222.
2
Social disparities in parental smoking and young children's exposure to secondhand smoke at home: a time-trend analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from the German KiGGS study between 2003-2006 and 2009-2012.父母吸烟及幼儿在家接触二手烟方面的社会差异:对2003 - 2006年及2009 - 2012年德国KiGGS研究重复横断面数据的时间趋势分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 8;16:485. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3175-x.
3
National and state prevalence of smoke-free rules in homes with and without children and smokers: Two decades of progress.有孩子和吸烟者家庭与无孩子和吸烟者家庭中无烟规定的全国及各州流行情况:二十年的进展。
Prev Med. 2016 Jan;82:51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
4
Smoke-Free Homes and Youth Smoking Behavior in Italy: Findings From the SIDRIAT Longitudinal Study.意大利无烟家庭与青少年吸烟行为:来自SIDRIAT纵向研究的结果
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Nov;18(11):2075-2082. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw149. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
5
Disadvantaged Parents' Engagement with a National Secondhand Smoke in the Home Mass Media Campaign: A Qualitative Study.弱势父母对全国性家庭二手烟大众媒体宣传活动的参与度:一项定性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 9;13(9):901. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090901.
6
"I can't stand it…but I do it sometimes" parental smoking around children: practices, beliefs, and conflicts - a qualitative study.“我无法忍受,但有时还是会这样做”——父母在孩子周围吸烟:实践、信念和冲突——一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 14;20(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08863-7.
7
"Everything the hujur tells is very educative but if I cannot apply those in my own life then there is no meaning": a mixed-methods process evaluation of a smoke-free homes intervention in Bangladesh.“呼吉尔告诉的每件事都非常有教育意义,但如果我不能将这些应用到自己的生活中,那么就没有意义了”:孟加拉国一项无烟家庭干预措施的混合方法过程评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;22(1):1889. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14283-6.
8
Smoke-free homes: what are the barriers, motivators and enablers? A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.无烟家庭:有哪些障碍、动机因素和促进因素?一项定性系统评价与主题综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e010260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010260.
9
Parental Practices and Attitudes Related to Smoke-Free Rules in Homes, Cars, and Outdoor Playgrounds in US Households With Underage Children and Smokers, 2010-2011.2010 - 2011年美国有未成年子女和吸烟者家庭中与家庭、汽车及户外游乐场无烟规则相关的父母行为及态度
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 18;12:E96. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140553.
10
Smoke-free home restrictions in Armenia and Georgia: motives, barriers and secondhand smoke reduction behaviors.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的无烟家庭限制:动机、障碍和减少二手烟行为。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;33(5):864-871. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad129.

本文引用的文献

1
A Qualitative Study about Creating Smoke-free Home Rules in American Indian and Alaska Native Households.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民家庭制定无烟家庭规则的定性研究。
J Community Health. 2019 Aug;44(4):684-693. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00666-1.
2
Understanding the multitude of barriers that prevent smokers in lower socioeconomic groups from accessing smoking cessation support: A literature review.理解阻止社会经济地位较低的吸烟者获得戒烟支持的众多障碍:文献回顾。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.029. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
3
Parental perceptions of children's exposure to tobacco smoke: development and validation of a new measure.父母对儿童接触烟草烟雾的看法:新测量工具的开发和验证。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5928-1.
4
Moderators of Establishing a Smoke-Free Home: Pooled Data from Three Randomized Controlled Trials of a Brief Intervention.建立无烟家庭的影响因素:简短干预措施的三项随机对照试验的汇总数据。
J Community Health. 2019 Feb;44(1):121-126. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0561-6.
5
Decreasing In-home Smoking of Adults-Results from a School-based Intervention Program in Viet Nam.减少成年人在家吸烟——越南一项基于学校的干预项目的成果
AIMS Public Health. 2016 Oct 24;3(4):863-879. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.863. eCollection 2016.
6
Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.旨在减少儿童接触环境烟草烟雾的家庭及照顾者吸烟控制项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 31;1(1):CD001746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub4.
7
Coaching to create a smoke-free home in a brief secondhand smoke intervention.在简短的二手烟干预中指导创建无烟家庭。
Health Educ Res. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):555-568. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx072.
8
Anticipated regret and health behavior: A meta-analysis.预期性后悔与健康行为:一项元分析。
Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1264-1275. doi: 10.1037/hea0000294. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Smoke-free homes: what are the barriers, motivators and enablers? A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.无烟家庭:有哪些障碍、动机因素和促进因素?一项定性系统评价与主题综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e010260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010260.
10
A process evaluation of an intervention to promote home smoking bans among low income households.一项旨在促进低收入家庭实施家庭禁烟的干预措施的过程评估。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Apr;55:120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.12.008. Epub 2015 Dec 29.