• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单节段与多节段减压性椎板切除术治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较

Comparison of Single-Level and Multilevel Decompressive Laminectomy for Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

作者信息

Adilay Utku, Guclu Bülent

机构信息

Balikesir University School of Medicine, Balikesir, Turkey.

Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;111:e235-e240. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.033. Epub 2017 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.033
PMID:29258933
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify whether multiple compressions of nerve roots resulted in poorer surgical outcome when patients were treated with single-level decompressive laminectomy or multilevel decompressive laminectomy. To reach this we compared preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and walking duration of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients treated with single-level and multilevel decompressive laminectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 112 consecutive patients undergoing lumbar decompressive surgery without arthrodesis for LSS between March 2010 and September 2013. Forty-eight patients were treated with single-level laminectomy and 64 patients were treated with multilevel laminectomy. ODI scores, VAS scores, and walking duration were measured for all patients preoperatively and 30 months after decompressive surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64.41 ± 13.4 years. The ODI scores, VAS scores, and walking duration difference between patients treated with single-level laminectomy and multilevel laminectomy were statistically significant and higher for the first group (P < 0.05). There were more operative complications in patients treated with multilevel decompressive laminectomy; however, there was no statistically significant difference between single-level and multilevel decompressed patients regarding complications (P = 0.119). Four of the patients treated with multilevel decompressive laminectomy experienced postoperative spondylolisthesis needing posterior instrumented fusion.

CONCLUSION

Recovery in terms of ODI scores, VAS scores, and walking duration was better in LSS patients undergoing single-level laminectomy than in those undergoing multilevel laminectomy. Also, the rates of operative complications and postoperative follow-up spondylolisthesis were higher in patients treated with multilevel laminectomy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在明确当患者接受单节段减压椎板切除术或多节段减压椎板切除术治疗时,神经根的多次受压是否会导致手术效果较差。为实现这一目的,我们比较了接受单节段和多节段减压椎板切除术治疗的多节段腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者术前和术后的奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及步行时间。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2010年3月至2013年9月期间连续112例因LSS接受非融合腰椎减压手术的患者。48例患者接受了单节段椎板切除术,64例患者接受了多节段椎板切除术。对所有患者在术前及减压手术后30个月测量ODI评分、VAS评分和步行时间。

结果

患者的平均年龄为64.41±13.4岁。接受单节段椎板切除术和多节段椎板切除术的患者之间,ODI评分、VAS评分和步行时间差异具有统计学意义,且第一组更高(P<0.05)。接受多节段减压椎板切除术的患者手术并发症更多;然而,单节段和多节段减压患者在并发症方面无统计学显著差异(P = 0.119)。接受多节段减压椎板切除术的患者中有4例术后发生椎体滑脱,需要后路器械融合。

结论

接受单节段椎板切除术的LSS患者在ODI评分、VAS评分和步行时间方面的恢复情况优于接受多节段椎板切除术的患者。此外,接受多节段椎板切除术的患者手术并发症发生率和术后随访椎体滑脱率更高。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Single-Level and Multilevel Decompressive Laminectomy for Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.单节段与多节段减压性椎板切除术治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较
World Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;111:e235-e240. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.033. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
2
Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.有或无术前椎体滑脱患者行微创腰椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及再次手术率
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):339-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE13597. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
3
Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.腰椎管狭窄症减压性椎板切除术的结果:微创单侧双侧减压椎板切除术与开放椎板切除术的比较:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):179-86. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13420. Epub 2014 May 30.
4
Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.对因退行性腰椎管狭窄症接受减压性椎板切除术和后路内固定术患者手术结果的前瞻性分析。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(3):235-40. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2278.
5
Outcomes of multisegmental transforaminal enlarged decompression plus posterior pedicle screw fixation for multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with lumbar instability.多节段经椎间孔扩大减压加后路椎弓根螺钉固定治疗伴腰椎不稳的多节段腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。
Int J Surg. 2018 Feb;50:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.031. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
6
Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.双通道内窥镜与显微镜下腰椎减压椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.双侧椎板切开术或全椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的长期临床疗效:单中心经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18651.
8
Full-endoscopic (bi-portal or uni-portal) versus microscopic lumbar decompression laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.全内镜(双入路或单入路)与显微镜下腰椎减压椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):595-611. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02604-2. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
9
Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study.双侧板间入路与经典椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的减压效果:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E3. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18725.
10
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.

引用本文的文献

1
No long term benefit of decompression of a borderline lumbar spinal stenosis level adjacent to a more stenotic index level.对于与更狭窄指数水平相邻的临界腰椎管狭窄节段进行减压,无长期益处。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09113-3.
2
Comparison of Biportal Endoscopic Technique and Conventional Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) for Multi-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly People.双孔椎间孔镜技术与传统单侧椎板切除术治疗老年人多节段退变性腰椎管狭窄双侧减压(ULBD)的比较
Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(8):2302-2312. doi: 10.1111/os.70084. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
3
Single and multilevel decompression alone in patients with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
多节段腰椎管狭窄症患者单纯单节段和多节段减压:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 16;48(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03219-4.
4
Time Course of Asymptomatic Stenosis in Multiple Lumbar Spinal Stenosis-Five-Year Results of Selective Decompression of Symptomatic Levels.多节段腰椎管狭窄症无症状狭窄的时间进程——症状性节段选择性减压的五年结果
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 15;60(4):636. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040636.
5
Machine Learning Predicts Decompression Levels for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Using Canal Radiomic Features from Computed Tomography Myelography.机器学习利用计算机断层扫描脊髓造影的椎管影像组学特征预测腰椎管狭窄症的减压水平。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 26;14(1):53. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010053.
6
Correlation of psoas major muscle morphology with function and clinical symptoms in patients with symptomatic multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis.症状性多节段腰椎管狭窄症患者的腰大肌形态与功能及临床症状的相关性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 15;18(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03596-w.
7
A Comparative Analysis of Bi-Portal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Multilevel Lumbar Stenosis Patients.双门内镜脊柱手术与单侧椎板切开术治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症双侧减压的比较分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 29;12(3):1033. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031033.
8
Evacuation of a spontaneous massive spinal epidural hematoma by a minimally invasive surgical technique: a case report.自发性巨大硬脊膜外血肿的微创外科治疗:病例报告。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Oct 4;43:55. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.55.36552. eCollection 2022.
9
Lumbar Pedicular Stress Fracture Post-laminectomy: a Case Report.腰椎椎板切除术后椎弓根应力性骨折:一例报告
SN Compr Clin Med. 2022;4(1):221. doi: 10.1007/s42399-022-01289-9. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
10
Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years.接受仅减压的三级或以上腰椎管狭窄手术的患者在两年时的结果与接受单节段手术的患者相似。
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):945-952. doi: 10.14444/8124. Epub 2021 Sep 22.