Gomes Fernando Cotrim, Larcipretti Anna Laura Lima, Udoma-Udofa Ofonime Chantal, da Mata Paulo Barrouin, Bannach Matheus de Andrade
Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
School of Medicine, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 16;48(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03219-4.
Multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent degenerative condition characterized by lower back pain, intermittent claudication, and radicular leg pain. It ranks as one of the primary indications of spinal surgery in patients aged 65 and older. In this study, we aim to compare single-level and multilevel approaches for decompression alone in LSS considering the incidence of complications, reduction in pain score, and rates of surgical revisions. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies directly comparing single-level and multilevel decompression in patients with LSS. A total of 1,039 patients across five studies were analyzed, with 605 (58.2%) patients who underwent single-level decompression and 434 (41.8%) patients in the multilevel decompression cohort. Despite the multilevel decompression group showing a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 7%), there was no statistically significant difference between groups (OR 0.60; 95%CI 0.34-1.08; p = 0.087; I = 0%). Also, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of pain score reduction. (OR 0.70; 95%CI -0.37-1.77; p = 0.199; I = 96%). Ultimately, surgical revision was necessary for 33 (8%) patients in the single-level cohort and 7 (5%) patients in the multilevel group, however, there was no statistically significant difference (OR 1.81; 95% CI 0.78-4.18; p = 0.166; I = 0%). Decompression involving two or more levels showed comparable postoperative outcomes to single-level decompression, suggesting it could be a non-inferior procedure. Nevertheless, further research is required to solidify its efficacy and safety profile.
多节段腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是一种常见的退行性疾病,其特征为下背部疼痛、间歇性跛行和放射性腿痛。它是65岁及以上患者脊柱手术的主要指征之一。在本研究中,我们旨在比较单纯减压的单节段和多节段手术方式,考量并发症发生率、疼痛评分降低情况及手术翻修率。我们在PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了系统检索,以查找直接比较LSS患者单节段和多节段减压的研究。共分析了五项研究中的1039例患者,其中605例(58.2%)接受了单节段减压,434例(41.8%)在多节段减压队列中。尽管多节段减压组的并发症发生率较高(14%对7%),但两组之间无统计学显著差异(OR 0.60;95%CI 0.34 - 1.08;p = 0.087;I = 0%)。此外,两组在疼痛评分降低方面也无统计学显著差异(OR 0.70;95%CI - 0.37 - 1.77;p = 0.199;I = 96%)。最终,单节段队列中有33例(8%)患者需要进行手术翻修,多节段组中有7例(5%)患者需要翻修,然而,两组之间无统计学显著差异(OR 1.81;95%CI 0.78 - 4.18;p = 0.166;I = 0%)。涉及两个或更多节段的减压术后结果与单节段减压相当,表明它可能是一种非劣效手术。尽管如此,仍需要进一步研究以巩固其疗效和安全性。