Comparative study of ProTaper gold, reciproc, and ProTaper universal for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the root canal transportation, centering ability, and instrumentation times with the ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA), Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany), and ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty mesial root canals of mandibular first molars with curvature angles of 35°-70° and radii of 2-6 mm were included in the study. Root canal instrumentation was performed up to F2 or R25. The instrumentation times were recorded. CBCT scanning was performed both pre- and post-instrumentation. Root canal transportation and the centering ratio were calculated for groups, and the data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and least significant difference tests for the instrumentation time, root canal transportation, and centering ratio at the 95% confidence level ( = 0.05).

RESULTS

At 3, 5, and 7 mm levels, there was no significant difference in the root canal transportation and centering ratio among the groups ( > 0.05). There were significant differences between the Reciproc and ProTaper Universal groups in the instrumentation times ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Root canal transportation and the centering ratio with the ProTaper Gold were similar to those obtained with the ProTaper Universal and Reciproc.