Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者的心理社会干预与幸福感:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Pascoe Michaela C, Thompson David R, Castle David J, Jenkins Zoe M, Ski Chantal F

机构信息

Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 5;8:2063. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02063. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

A number of studies, including systematic reviews, show beneficial effects of psychosocial interventions for people with diabetes mellitus; however, they have not been assessed using meta-analysis. The purpose of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is to investigate the effects of psychosocial interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms, quality of life and self-efficacy in individuals with diabetes mellitus. The databases Pubmed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and SocINDEX were searched with no year restriction. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials published in English that included individuals diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, aged 18 years or above, who engaged in a psychosocial intervention, with outcome measures addressing depressive or anxiety symptomology, quality of life or self-efficacy. Eligible studies needed to compare the intervention to usual care. Study selection was completed using Covidence and meta-analysis was undertaken using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Five studies investigated the effects of psychosocial interventions and showed a medium to large benefit for depressive symptoms (: -0.70; CI: -1.27, -0.13) which persisted at follow up (: -1.54, : -2.97, -0.12). Similar results were not seen immediately post-intervention in the three studies that assessed anxiety symptoms (: -0.30; CI: -0.69, 0.10); however, a medium beneficial effect was seen at follow up ( = -0.61, = -0.92 to -0.31). Small benefits were seen in the three studies assessing quality of life outcomes (: 0.30, : 0.06, 0.55). No benefit was seen in the two studies assessing self-efficacy (: 0.23, : -0.11, 0.57). The results of the current study provide preliminary evidence that psychosocial interventions, compared to usual care, reduce depressive symptoms, and may improve quality of life in individuals with diabetes. However, only a few studies were included and the clinical significance of these findings is unknown.

摘要

包括系统评价在内的多项研究表明,心理社会干预对糖尿病患者有有益效果;然而,尚未使用荟萃分析对其进行评估。这项随机对照试验的荟萃分析旨在研究心理社会干预对糖尿病患者抑郁和焦虑症状、生活质量及自我效能的影响。对数据库PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus、Web of Science和SocINDEX进行了不限年份的检索。符合条件的研究为以英文发表的随机对照试验,纳入18岁及以上被诊断患有糖尿病且接受心理社会干预的个体,其结局指标涉及抑郁或焦虑症状、生活质量或自我效能。符合条件的研究需将干预措施与常规护理进行比较。使用Covidence完成研究筛选,并使用Comprehensive Meta-Analysis软件进行荟萃分析。荟萃分析纳入了7项研究。5项研究调查了心理社会干预的效果,结果显示对抑郁症状有中度至较大益处(效应量:-0.70;置信区间:-1.27,-0.13),随访时该益处依然存在(效应量:-1.54,下限:-2.97,上限:-0.12)。在评估焦虑症状的3项研究中,干预后即刻未观察到类似结果(效应量:-0.30;置信区间:-0.69,0.10);然而,随访时观察到中度有益效果(效应量=-0.61,下限=-0.92,上限=-0.31)。在评估生活质量结局的3项研究中观察到小的益处(效应量:0.30,下限:0.06,上限:0.55)。在评估自我效能的2项研究中未观察到益处(效应量:0.23,下限:-0.11,上限:0.57)。本研究结果提供了初步证据,表明与常规护理相比,心理社会干预可减轻糖尿病患者的抑郁症状,并可能改善其生活质量。然而,纳入的研究较少,这些发现的临床意义尚不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0322/5723413/e44910791bed/fpsyg-08-02063-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验