Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症患者六步台阶测试的重测信度和可靠性。

Test-retest agreement and reliability of the Six Spot Step Test in persons with multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark/Section for Sport Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2019 Feb;25(2):286-294. doi: 10.1177/1352458517745725. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Six Spot Step Test (SSST) extends traditional walking outcomes in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) by further challenging components of coordination and balance. Nonetheless, the test-retest agreement of the SSST has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the within-day, day-to-day, and inter-rater agreement and reliability of the SSST in PwMS. A secondary aim was to investigate the validity of handheld timing.

METHODS

A total of 38 PwMS with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) <6.5 completed two SSSTs with a 5-minute break in-between. After 2 days, this procedure was repeated. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine the 95% Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated. In a subgroup of 18 PwMS, the SSSTs were video-recorded and timed by a second investigator.

RESULTS

The relative LOA within and between days were ±15% and ±19%, while ICC were 0.987 and 0.983, respectively. A minor learning effect was found over four tests. The handheld timing error was ±0.5 seconds when compared to video-based timing.

CONCLUSION

The SSST has an acceptable within- and between-day agreement and reliability. For interventional purposes, a change of >19% can be regarded as a real change. Valid timing can be performed by a handheld stopwatch.

摘要

背景

六点步梯测试(SSST)通过进一步挑战协调和平衡能力,扩展了多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)的传统步行测试结果。然而,尚未对 SSST 的重测信度进行研究。

目的

确定 SSST 在 PwMS 中的日内、日间和评定者间的一致性和可靠性。次要目的是研究手持计时的有效性。

方法

共有 38 名 EDSS<6.5 的 PwMS 完成了两次 SSST,两次测试之间有 5 分钟的休息时间。两天后,重复该程序。采用 Bland-Altman 分析确定 95%的一致性界限(LOA),并计算了组内相关系数(ICC)。在 18 名 PwMS 的亚组中,使用第二观察者对 SSST 进行录像和计时。

结果

日内和日间的相对 LOA 分别为±15%和±19%,ICC 分别为 0.987 和 0.983。四次测试中发现了轻微的学习效应。与基于视频的计时相比,手持计时的误差为±0.5 秒。

结论

SSST 具有可接受的日内和日间一致性和可靠性。对于干预性目的,可以将>19%的变化视为真实变化。手持秒表可以进行有效的计时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验