Nora David, Póvoa Pedro
Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.
NOVA Medical School, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Nov;5(22):450. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.09.16.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common infection in intensive care units (ICUs) but its clinical definition is neither sensitive nor specific and lacks accuracy and objectivity. New defining criteria were proposed in 2013 by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) in order to more accurately conduct surveillance and track prevention progress. Although there is a consistent trend towards a decrease in VAP incidence during the last decade, significant differences in VAP rates have been reported and are persistently lower in NHSN and other American reports (0.0 to 4.4 VAP per 1,000 ventilator-days in 2012) compared to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) data (10 VAP per 1,000 ventilator-days in 2014). In the United States, VAP has been proposed as an indicator of quality of care in public reporting, and the threat of financial penalties for this diagnosis has put pressure on hospitals to minimize VAP rates that may lead to artificial lower values, independently of patient care. Although prevention bundles may contribute for encouraging reductions in VAP incidence, both pathophysiologic and epidemiologic factors preclude a zero-VAP rate. It would be expected from the trend of reduction of VAP incidence that the consumption of antibiotics would also decrease in particular in those hospitals with lowest VAP rates. However, ICU reports show a steadily use of antibiotics for nosocomial pneumonia in 15% of patients and both ECDC and NHSN data on antibiotic consumption showed no significant trend. Knowledge of bacterial epidemiology and resistance profiles for each ICU has great relevance in order to understand trends of antibiotic use. The new NHSN criteria provide a more objective and quantitative data based VAP definition, including an antibiotic administration criterion, allowing, in theory, a more comprehensive assessment and a reportable benchmark of the observed VAP and antibiotic consumption variability.
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是重症监护病房(ICU)常见的感染,但它的临床定义既不敏感也不特异,缺乏准确性和客观性。2013年,美国国家医疗安全网络(NHSN)提出了新的定义标准,以便更准确地进行监测并跟踪预防进展。尽管在过去十年中VAP发病率呈持续下降趋势,但不同报告的VAP发生率存在显著差异,且与欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)的数据(2014年每1000个呼吸机日有10例VAP)相比,NHSN和其他美国报告中的VAP发生率持续较低(2012年每1000个呼吸机日有0.0至4.4例VAP)。在美国,VAP已被提议作为公共报告中医疗质量的一项指标,因这一诊断可能面临经济处罚的威胁,给医院带来压力,促使其尽量降低VAP发生率,这可能导致人为的低数值,而与患者护理无关。尽管预防集束措施可能有助于降低VAP发病率,但病理生理和流行病学因素使得VAP发生率无法降为零。从VAP发病率下降的趋势来看,抗生素的使用量也应该减少,尤其是在VAP发生率最低的那些医院。然而,ICU报告显示,15%的患者因医院获得性肺炎持续使用抗生素,而且ECDC和NHSN关于抗生素使用的数据均未显示出显著趋势。了解每个ICU的细菌流行病学和耐药谱对于理解抗生素使用趋势具有重要意义。新的NHSN标准提供了一个基于更客观和定量数据的VAP定义,包括抗生素使用标准,理论上允许对观察到的VAP和抗生素使用差异进行更全面的评估和可报告的基准。