Clinical Psychology Unit, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2018 Mar;26(2):92-111. doi: 10.1002/erv.2577. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
To systematically review the literature reporting outcomes of augmentative family-based treatment (FBT) interventions for adolescents with restrictive eating disorders (EDs).
Articles were identified through a systematic search of five electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database).
Thirty articles were included, reporting on FBT augmentations featuring adjunctive treatment components, modified treatment structure and/or content with adherence to FBT principles, and adaptations allowing FBT delivery in different settings. All reported significant improvements in weight and/or ED symptoms at end-of-treatment, although few compared augmentative and standard FBT interventions and good quality follow-up data was generally lacking.
There is early evidence for the effectiveness of augmentative FBT-based approaches in facilitating weight and/or ED symptom improvements for adolescents with restrictive EDs. There remains a lack of robust evidence demonstrating superior effects of such approaches over standard FBT, and further controlled studies are required to expand on the current evidence. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
系统回顾文献报告了以家庭为基础的补充治疗(FBT)干预对限制型饮食障碍(ED)青少年的结果。
通过对五个电子数据库(PsycINFO、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane 数据库)的系统检索,确定了文章。
共纳入 30 篇文章,报告了 FBT 补充治疗特点,包括附加治疗成分、修改治疗结构和/或内容,同时坚持 FBT 原则,以及允许在不同环境下提供 FBT 的适应方法。所有研究均报告在治疗结束时体重和/或 ED 症状有显著改善,但很少比较补充和标准 FBT 干预,且通常缺乏高质量的随访数据。
早期有证据表明,基于 FBT 的补充方法有助于促进限制型 ED 青少年的体重和/或 ED 症状改善。目前仍缺乏有力证据表明这些方法比标准 FBT 更有效,需要进一步的对照研究来扩大现有证据。版权所有 © 2017 约翰威利父子公司和饮食失调协会。