Suppr超能文献

机械通气患者结局的医师水平差异。

Physician-Level Variation in Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

机构信息

1 Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine.

2 Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Department of Medicine.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Mar;15(3):371-379. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201711-867OC.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Physicians are increasingly being held accountable for patient outcomes, yet their specific contribution to the outcomes remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To determine variation in outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients among intensivists, as well as associations between intensivist experience and patient outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated Medicare fee-for-service patients in acute care hospitals in Pennsylvania using administrative, clinical, and physician data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the American Medical Association from 2008 and 2009. We identified intensivists by training background, board certification, and claims for services provided to patients admitted to an intensive care unit. We assigned patients to intensivists for outcome attribution based on submitted claims for critical care and in-patient services. We estimated the physician-specific adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for 30-day mortality using a hierarchical model with a random effect for physician, adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. We tested for independent association of physician experience with patient outcomes using mixed-effects regression for the primary outcome of 30-day mortality. We defined physician experience in two ways: years since training completion ("duration") and annual number of mechanically ventilated patients ("volume").

RESULTS

We assigned 345 physicians to 11,268 patients. The 30-day mortality was 43% and median hospital length of stay was 11 days (interquartile range = 6-18). The physician adjusted OR varied from 0.72 to 1.64 (median = 0.99; interquartile range = 0.92-1.09). A total of 48% of physicians was outliers, with an adjusted OR significantly different from 1. However, among intensivists, physician experience was not associated with 30-day mortality (duration OR = 1.00 per additional year; 95% confidence interval = 1.00-1.01; volume OR = 1.00 per additional patient; 95% confidence interval = 1.00-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensivists independently contribute to outcomes of Medicare patients who undergo mechanical ventilation, as evidenced by the variation in risk-adjusted mortality across intensivists. However, physician experience does not underlie this relationship between intensivists, suggesting the need to identify modifiable physician factors to improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

医生越来越需要对患者的预后负责,但他们对预后的具体贡献仍不确定。

目的

确定重症监护医师在机械通气患者结局中的差异,以及重症监护医师经验与患者结局之间的关系。

方法

我们使用来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心和美国医学协会的行政、临床和医生数据,对宾夕法尼亚州急性护理医院接受机械通气的医疗保险收费服务患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们通过培训背景、委员会认证和向入住重症监护病房的患者提供服务的索赔来确定重症监护医师。我们根据提交的重症监护和住院服务索赔,将患者分配给负责结果归因的重症监护医师。我们使用具有医师随机效应的分层模型,调整患者和医院特征后,估计 30 天死亡率的医师特异性调整后比值比(OR)。我们使用混合效应回归测试医师经验与主要结局(30 天死亡率)的独立关联。我们以两种方式定义医师经验:培训完成后的年限(“持续时间”)和每年接受机械通气的患者数量(“数量”)。

结果

我们将 345 名医师分配给 11268 名患者。30 天死亡率为 43%,中位住院时间为 11 天(四分位距为 6-18)。医师调整后的 OR 从 0.72 到 1.64 不等(中位数为 0.99;四分位距为 0.92-1.09)。共有 48%的医师为异常值,调整后的 OR 明显不等于 1。然而,在重症监护医师中,医师经验与 30 天死亡率无关(持续时间 OR 每增加 1 年为 1.00;95%置信区间为 1.00-1.01;数量 OR 每增加 1 名患者为 1.00;95%置信区间为 1.00-1.00)。

结论

重症监护医师独立影响接受机械通气的 Medicare 患者的结局,这体现在重症监护医师之间的风险调整死亡率差异上。然而,医师经验并不是这种重症监护医师关系的基础,这表明需要确定可改变的医师因素以改善结局。

相似文献

7
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in the Emergency Department.急诊科机械通气的持续时间。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):972-979. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.34099. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Physician volume, specialty, and outcomes of care for patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者的医生数量、专业和治疗结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):890-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000064. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验