• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乙醇酸作为弯曲根管最终冲洗液去除碎屑和玷污层的效果:一项扫描电子显微镜研究

Efficacy of Glycolic Acid on Debris and Smear Removal as a Final Rinse Solution in Curved Canals: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.

作者信息

Venkataraman Karunakaran Jeyaraman, Boominathan Suresh Krishna, Nagappan Ragavendran, Abraham Chris Susan, Kaliyaperumal Anbarasi, Nachimuthu Jayaprakash, Premkumar Modachur Muruganathan

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, JKK Nataraja Dental College and Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1603-S1608. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_310_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_310_21
PMID:35018038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8686924/
Abstract

AIM

This study aims to compare intraradicular smear layer removal efficacy of different concentrations of glycolic acid (GA), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 10% citric acid (CA) as final rinses in the canals of curved mesial root of mandibular first molars using the specific irrigant protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight mandibular first permanent molars with 15°-30° of curvature of the mesial roots were selected, standardized, mesiobuccal canal prepared using the rotary instrumentation. Sodium hypochlorite was used as initial rinse solution (8 ml). The samples were divided into control ( = 5) (I - Normal saline and II - 17% EDTA) and experimental groups ( = 8) (Groups III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII) based on the type of final rinse solution (5 ml) used, i.e. 2.5% GA, 5% GA, 10% GA, 17% GA, 37% GA, and 10% CA. Samples were split buccolingually, dehydrated, splutter coated, and examined under a scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

Group IV presented the least amounts of smear among the GA experimental groups at the apical, middle, and coronal one-thirds of the root canal with a mean value of 2.6 ± 1.012, and on comparison with Group II, the results were comparable, and no significant difference found statistically ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of GA as final rinse solution for biomechanical preparation during endodontic therapy seems promising. Further evaluation in a clinical setting is recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在特定冲洗方案下,不同浓度的乙醇酸(GA)、17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和10%柠檬酸(CA)作为下颌第一磨牙近中弯曲根管最终冲洗液时,去除根管内牙本质玷污层的效果。

材料与方法

选取58颗近中根弯曲度为15° - 30°的下颌第一恒磨牙,进行标准化处理,使用旋转器械预备近中颊根管。次氯酸钠用作初始冲洗液(8毫升)。根据最终冲洗液(5毫升)的类型,将样本分为对照组(n = 5)(I - 生理盐水和II - 17% EDTA)和实验组(n = 8)(III、IV、V、VI、VII和VIII组),即2.5% GA、5% GA、10% GA、17% GA、37% GA和10% CA。样本沿颊舌向劈开,脱水,溅射镀膜,然后在扫描电子显微镜下检查。

结果

在GA实验组中,IV组在根管根尖、中部和冠部三分之一处的玷污层最少,平均值为2.6 ± 1.012,与II组相比,结果具有可比性,统计学上无显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

在牙髓治疗中,使用GA作为生物力学预备的最终冲洗液似乎很有前景。建议在临床环境中进行进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/6cf25dcb8967/JPBS-13-1603-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/630a25a8b3c5/JPBS-13-1603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/cb6d24c89c77/JPBS-13-1603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/df07d1da5ba6/JPBS-13-1603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/28f60db45eec/JPBS-13-1603-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/6f6124667b13/JPBS-13-1603-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/6cf25dcb8967/JPBS-13-1603-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/630a25a8b3c5/JPBS-13-1603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/cb6d24c89c77/JPBS-13-1603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/df07d1da5ba6/JPBS-13-1603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/28f60db45eec/JPBS-13-1603-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/6f6124667b13/JPBS-13-1603-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67fb/8686924/6cf25dcb8967/JPBS-13-1603-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Glycolic Acid on Debris and Smear Removal as a Final Rinse Solution in Curved Canals: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.乙醇酸作为弯曲根管最终冲洗液去除碎屑和玷污层的效果:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1603-S1608. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_310_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
Intraradicular Smear Removal Efficacy of Triphala as a Final Rinse Solution in Curved Canals: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.三果汤作为弯曲根管最终冲洗液对根管内涂片的清除效果:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S420-S428. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_55_19.
3
A Comparative Evaluation of Phytic Acid as Final Rinse Solution with Other Chelating Agents for Elimination of Intraradicular Smear: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.植酸作为终末冲洗液与其他螯合剂用于消除根管内玷污层的比较评价:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S576-S582. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_186_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
4
A Comparative Evaluation of Intraradicular Smear Removal Efficacy of 2% Chitosan (Low Molecular Weight), 4% Chitosan Citrate, and 10% Citric Acid when Used as Final Rinse in Irrigation Protocols: A Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.2%壳聚糖(低分子量)、4%柠檬酸壳聚糖和10%柠檬酸用作冲洗方案中的最终冲洗液时根管内涂片清除效果的比较评价:场发射扫描电子显微镜研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S73-S78. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_158_17.
5
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.不同终末冲洗液激活方案对弯曲根管内玷污层去除效果的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.使用扫描电子显微镜对手动与旋转ProTaper技术联合制备的根管壁上的玷污层和碎屑进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81.
7
Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM).不同冲洗激活装置与传统注射器冲洗在弯曲根管内对玷污层和碎屑清除效果的比较。(使用扫描电镜观察冲洗激活对玷污层的去除效果)
Aust Endod J. 2021 Aug;47(2):143-149. doi: 10.1111/aej.12482. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Smear Layer Evaluation on Root Canal Preparation with Manual and Rotary Techniques using EDTA as an Irrigant: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.使用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)作为冲洗剂,采用手动和旋转技术进行根管预备时的玷污层评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Feb;5(1):66-78. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Effect of 17% EDTA and MTAD on intracanal smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopic study.17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和甲基丙烯酸甲酯-四环素-酸性磷酸酶抑制剂(MTAD)对根管内玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜研究
Aust Endod J. 2009 Apr;35(1):13-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00111.x.
10
Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.不同根管冲洗方案的根管清创效果。
Int Endod J. 2012 Oct;45(10):898-906. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02046.x. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial properties of calcium hydroxide-loaded polylactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles and calcium hydroxide: A systematic review and meta-analysis.载氢氧化钙聚乳酸-乙醇酸共聚物纳米颗粒与氢氧化钙抗菌性能的比较评价:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;28(8):727-733. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_294_25. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
Influence of glycolic acid as a chelating agent for smear layer removal and its effect on the microhardness of root canal dentin - A systematic review.乙醇酸作为去除玷污层的螯合剂的影响及其对根管牙本质显微硬度的作用——一项系统评价
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;28(2):112-118. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_679_24. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of a new irrigant solution containing glycolic acid on smear layer removal and chemical/mechanical properties of dentin.含羟基乙酸新型冲洗液对牙本质玷污层去除及理化性能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 30;10(1):7313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64450-1.
2
Antimicrobial activity of glycolic acid as a final irrigant solution for root canal preparation.乙醇酸作为根管预备最终冲洗液的抗菌活性
Gen Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;68(1):41-44.
3
Glycolic acid: Characterization of a new final irrigant and effects on flexural strength and structural integrity of dentin.
甘醇酸:一种新型终末冲洗剂的特性及其对牙本质弯曲强度和结构完整性的影响。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 Jan;106:110283. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110283. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
4
Glycolic acid as the final irrigant in endodontics: Mechanical and cytotoxic effects.在牙髓学中,甘醇酸作为最终冲洗液:机械和细胞毒性作用。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 Jul;100:323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation.不同活化冲洗技术对弯曲根管内碎屑和玷污层清除效果的扫描电镜评价
Aust Endod J. 2020 Apr;46(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/aej.12342. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
One-step continuous/semi-continuous whole-cell catalysis production of glycolic acid by a combining bioprocess with in-situ cell recycling and electrodialysis.一步法连续/半连续全细胞催化生产乙醇酸,该过程结合了生物过程、细胞原位回收和电渗析。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Feb;273:515-520. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.061. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
7
A Bilayered Poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) Scaffold Provides Differential Cues for the Differentiation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells.双层聚(乳酸-共-乙醇酸)支架为牙髓干细胞分化提供了不同的信号。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2019 Feb;25(3-4):224-233. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2018.0041. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
A Novel Enamel and Dentin Etching Protocol Using α-hydroxy Glycolic Acid: Surface Property, Etching Pattern, and Bond Strength Studies.一种使用α-羟基乙醇酸的新型牙釉质和牙本质酸蚀方案:表面特性、酸蚀模式及粘结强度研究
Oper Dent. 2018 Jan/Feb;43(1):101-110. doi: 10.2341/16-136-L.
9
Controlled release of lovastatin from poly(lactic--glycolic acid) nanoparticles for direct pulp capping in rat teeth.洛伐他汀从聚乳酸-乙醇酸纳米颗粒中控制释放用于大鼠牙齿直接盖髓
Int J Nanomedicine. 2017 Jul 31;12:5473-5485. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S138410. eCollection 2017.
10
Fabrication and Appraisal of Poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) - Moxifloxacin Nanoparticles using Vitamin E-TPGS: A Potential Intracanal Drug Delivery Agent.使用维生素E-TPGS制备及评价聚(乳酸-乙醇酸)-莫西沙星纳米颗粒:一种潜在的根管内给药制剂
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZC05-ZC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/27633.9957. Epub 2017 Jun 1.