• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传性皮肤病患者报告的疾病特异性健康相关生活质量结局测量指标:系统评价和批判性评估。

Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Dec 29;12(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0739-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13023-017-0739-5
PMID:29284525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5747090/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have high utility in evaluation of new interventions in genodermatoses, however inconsistent standards of development and validation have hampered widespread acceptance and adoption.

OBJECTIVES

To identify all published HR-QoL PROMs in genodermatoses and critically evaluate their development and measurement properties.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016053301). Ovid Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases were utilised for literature review using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. PROM development was assessed using the COSMIN Checklist and measurement properties were assessed against quality criteria for measurement properties of health standard questionnaires.

RESULTS

15 HRQoL PROMs in genodermatoses were identified. Major areas of deficiency in development were internal consistency, reliability and structural validity. No PROM satisfied measurement property standards for agreement, responsiveness or floor and ceiling effects. Four PROMs included Minimal Important Change scores for interpretability. Issues regarding the generalisability of the evaluated PROMs in culturally diverse and paediatric populations remain unresolved.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall standards of development and measurement properties in PROMs in genodermatoses is fair, despite no single instrument meeting all requirements. None are perfectly validated according to COSMIN criteria but seven of the fifteen PROMs may be appropriate pending further validation. The development of culturally appropriate and child-specific variants of PROMs should be a priority in order to increase the utility of patient based outcome measures in genodermatoses in various patient populations.

摘要

背景

健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)患者报告结局测量(PROM)在评估新的基因皮肤病干预措施方面具有很高的实用性,但是开发和验证的标准不一致,阻碍了其广泛接受和采用。

目的

确定所有已发表的基因皮肤病患者报告结局测量(PROM),并对其开发和测量性能进行严格评估。

方法

本系统评价在 PROSPERO(CRD42016053301)上进行了注册。使用预设的纳入和排除标准,对 Ovid Medline、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库进行文献综述。使用 COSMIN 清单评估 PROM 的开发情况,并根据健康标准问卷测量性能的质量标准评估测量性能。

结果

确定了 15 种基因皮肤病患者报告结局测量(PROM)。在开发过程中,主要存在内部一致性、可靠性和结构有效性等方面的不足。没有一种 PROM 满足协议、反应性或下限和上限效应的测量性能标准。四个 PROM 包括可解释性的最小重要变化分数。评估的 PROM 在文化多样性和儿科人群中的通用性问题仍未解决。

结论

尽管没有一种仪器满足所有要求,但 PROM 在基因皮肤病中的开发和测量性能总体标准是公平的。根据 COSMIN 标准,没有一个是完全有效的,但这 15 个 PROM 中有七个可能是合适的,需要进一步验证。开发文化适当和儿童专用的 PROM 应成为优先事项,以提高基于患者的结局测量在各种患者群体中的基因皮肤病中的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/5747090/65e0e2095746/13023_2017_739_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/5747090/65e0e2095746/13023_2017_739_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/5747090/65e0e2095746/13023_2017_739_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation.遗传性皮肤病患者报告的疾病特异性健康相关生活质量结局测量指标:系统评价和批判性评估。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Dec 29;12(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0739-5.
2
Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.评价成人脊柱侧弯生活质量的评估方法:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Spine Deform. 2022 Sep;10(5):991-1002. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00498-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
3
HIV-Specific Reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.HIV 特异性报告结局指标:心理计量学特性的系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Dec 8;8(12):e39015. doi: 10.2196/39015.
4
A Quality Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Sexual Function in Neurologic Patients Using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Checklist: A Systematic Review.采用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准清单对神经患者性功能的患者报告结局测量进行质量评估:系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Oct;3(4-5):444-456. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures for advanced skin cancer patients.晚期皮肤癌患者报告结局测量的系统评价。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Aug;315(6):1473-1480. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02479-0. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hyperhidrosis: a systematic review.多汗症患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)的测量特性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Mar;31(3):671-686. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02958-3. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review.原发性硬化性胆管炎患者中使用的患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jul 5;16(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0951-6.
8
Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review.最常用的足部和踝关节特异性问卷的测量特性:FFI、FAOS 和 FAAM。系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jul;26(7):2059-2073. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4748-7. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland.一项关于瑞士通用患者报告结局指标的COSMIN系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03942-x.
10
Psychometric Properties of Patient-reported Outcome Measures to Assess Resilience in Individuals with Musculoskeletal Pain or Rheumatic Conditions: A COSMIN-based Systematic Review.基于 COSMIN 的系统评价:评估肌肉骨骼疼痛或风湿性疾病患者韧性的患者报告结局测量的心理计量学特性。
Clin J Pain. 2023 Dec 1;39(12):695-706. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001162.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the German Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaire.大疱性表皮松解症德国生活质量问卷(QOLEB)的翻译、文化调适与验证
J Health Psychol. 2025 Jun;30(7):1476-1490. doi: 10.1177/13591053231221369. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
2
Understanding the impact of tuberous sclerosis complex: development and validation of the TSC-PROM.了解结节性硬化症的影响:TSC-PROM 的制定与验证。
BMC Med. 2023 Aug 8;21(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03012-4.
3
Patient-reported outcome measures and value-based medicine in paediatrics: a timely review.

本文引用的文献

1
Dietary supplement use and nosebleeds in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia - an observational study.遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症患者膳食补充剂的使用与鼻出血——一项观察性研究
Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2016 May;5(2):109-13. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2016.01019.
2
Can Iron Treatments Aggravate Epistaxis in Some Patients With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia?铁剂治疗会加重某些遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症患者的鼻出血吗?
Laryngoscope. 2016 Nov;126(11):2468-2474. doi: 10.1002/lary.25959. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
3
Quality of Life and Economic Burden in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.
儿科患者报告的结局指标与价值医疗:一篇及时的综述。
Singapore Med J. 2023 May;64(5):285-293. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021102.
4
Association between patient-reported outcomes and objective disease indices in people with NF2.神经纤维瘤病2型患者自我报告结果与客观疾病指标之间的关联。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;9(4):322-329. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000648.
5
Measuring quality of life of primary antibody deficiency patients using a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for common variable immunodeficiency (CVID_QoL).使用针对常见变异型免疫缺陷病的特定疾病健康相关生活质量问卷(CVID_QoL)来测量原发性抗体缺陷患者的生活质量。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Feb 26;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0101-x.
隐性营养不良型大疱性表皮松解症的生活质量与经济负担
Ann Dermatol. 2016 Feb;28(1):6-14. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.1.6. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
4
Measurement properties of adult quality-of-life measurement instruments for eczema: a systematic review.成人湿疹生活质量测量工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Allergy. 2016 Mar;71(3):358-70. doi: 10.1111/all.12806. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
5
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quality of Life Evaluation in Epidermolysis Bullosa instrument in Brazilian Portuguese.大疱性表皮松解症生活质量评估工具的巴西葡萄牙语翻译、跨文化调适及验证
Int J Dermatol. 2016 Feb;55(2):e94-9. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12819. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
6
Self-reported benefit, sound perception, and quality-of-life in patients with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs).听觉脑干植入(ABI)患者的自我报告获益、听觉感知及生活质量
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136(1):62-7. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1079925. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
Development and validation of an epidermolysis bullosa family/parental burden score.大疱性表皮松解症家系/父母负担评分的制定与验证。
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Dec;173(6):1405-10. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14072. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
8
Development and content validity testing of a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for the assessment of hereditary angioedema in observational studies.用于观察性研究中遗传性血管性水肿评估的患者报告结局问卷的开发与内容效度测试
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jul 1;13:92. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0292-7.
9
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.ROBIS:一种用于评估系统评价中偏倚风险的新工具被开发出来。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
Reliability and validity of the Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Index (aBCCdex).高级基底细胞癌指数(aBCCdex)的可靠性和有效性。
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Sep;173(3):713-9. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13877. Epub 2015 Jun 11.