Suppr超能文献

关于在身心医学研究中使用明尼苏达多相人格问卷(MMPI)K校正的一则警示。

A caution on the use of the MMPI K-correction in research on psychosomatic medicine.

作者信息

McCrae R R, Costa P T, Dahlstrom W G, Barefoot J C, Siegler I C, Williams R B

机构信息

Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD 21224.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;51(1):58-65. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198901000-00006.

Abstract

The MMPI K scale is widely used to screen for invalid responses and to adjust substantive scale scores for defensiveness. In a normal volunteer sample, correlations of MMPI clinical scales and the Cook-Medley Hostility (HO) scale with self-reports and peer ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) were decreased rather than increased by K-correction. Similarly, in a medical sample, structured interview-based ratings of Potential for Hostility were better predicted by uncorrected HO scores than by K-corrected HO scores. Finally, in a prospective study of mortality among lawyers, uncorrected HO scores were a significant predictor of all-cause mortality; K-corrected scores were not. The data suggest that, under some circumstances, the K scale may measure substantive traits rather than defensiveness, and should be used and interpreted with caution. Its use is probably contraindicated for most research on psychiatrically normal subjects.

摘要

明尼苏达多相人格问卷(MMPI)的K量表被广泛用于筛查无效回答,并针对防御性对实质量表分数进行调整。在一个正常志愿者样本中,MMPI临床量表以及库克-梅德利敌意(HO)量表与基于大五人格量表(NEO-PI)的自我报告和同伴评定之间的相关性,经K校正后是降低而非升高。同样,在一个医学样本中,基于结构化访谈的敌意可能性评定,未校正的HO分数比经K校正的HO分数能更好地进行预测。最后,在一项针对律师死亡率的前瞻性研究中,未校正的HO分数是全因死亡率的显著预测指标;经K校正的分数则不是。数据表明,在某些情况下,K量表可能测量的是实质特质而非防御性,使用时应谨慎并加以解释。对于大多数针对精神正常受试者的研究,可能不宜使用该量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验