留在患者体内的彭罗斯引流管：持续侵权行为。例证：Jumper诉Healthone公司（《联邦补充案例汇编》第699卷，第220页——南达科他州地区法院，1988年）。 - Suppr

Penrose drain left in patient: continuing tort. Case in point: Jumper v. Healthone Corp. (699 F. Supp. 220--SD (1988)).

Tammelleo A D

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1989 Feb;29(9):4.

Abstract

摘要

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1989 Feb;29(9):4.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1988 Jul;29(2):2.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1987 Nov;28(6):4.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1984 Jan;24(8):2.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1989 Jan;29(8):4.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1990 Feb;30(9):4.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1989 Aug;30(3):2.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1996 Mar;36(10):4.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1996 Jan;36(8):2.

Regan Rep Nurs Law. 1987 Sep;28(4):2.

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。