Onderdonk A B, Delaney M L, Zamarchi G R, Hirsch M L, Munoz A, Kass E H
Department of Pathology, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts 02130.
Rev Infect Dis. 1989 Jan-Feb;11 Suppl 1:S61-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.supplement_1.s61.
Although the effect of vaginal tampons on microbial flora during menstruation has been studied, the effects attributable to particular tampon fibers have received inadequate attention. The purpose of this report is to review previous studies and describe the results of laboratory tests that compare the effects of use of various tampons on the normal changes that occur in vaginal microflora during menstruation. Tampon and swab samples were obtained from volunteers on days 2, 4, and 21 after the start of menses. Statistical evaluation of the qualitative and quantitative data revealed that the same numerically dominant phenotypes were present regardless of sample type, sample time, or catamenial product. In general, total bacterial counts decreased during menstruation, and the total bacterial counts from tampon samples tended to be lower than those in concomitant swab samples. Predictable changes in total numbers of the dominant species were noted when the data were evaluated by day of menstrual cycle. Results indicate that the tampon type had little effect on the qualitative and quantitative composition of the vaginal microflora during the menstrual cycle.
尽管月经期间阴道棉条对微生物菌群的影响已得到研究,但特定棉条纤维的影响却未得到充分关注。本报告的目的是回顾以往的研究,并描述实验室测试结果,这些测试比较了使用各种棉条对月经期间阴道微生物群正常变化的影响。在月经开始后的第2天、第4天和第21天从志愿者处获取棉条和拭子样本。对定性和定量数据的统计评估表明,无论样本类型、采样时间或月经用品如何,数量上占主导的相同表型均存在。一般来说,月经期间细菌总数会减少,棉条样本中的细菌总数往往低于同期拭子样本中的细菌总数。当按月经周期的天数评估数据时,可观察到优势菌种总数的可预测变化。结果表明,棉条类型对月经周期中阴道微生物群的定性和定量组成影响不大。