1 Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
2 Columbia University, New York, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;44(4):451-474. doi: 10.1177/0146167217741313. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
Most individuals are stigmatized at some point. However, research often examines stigmas separately, thus underestimating the overall impact of stigma and precluding comparisons across stigmatized identities and conditions. In their classic text, Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships, Edward Jones and colleagues laid the groundwork for unifying the study of different stigmas by considering the shared dimensional features of stigmas: aesthetics, concealability, course, disruptiveness, origin, peril. Despite the prominence of this framework, no study has documented the extent to which stigmas differ along these dimensions, and the implications of this variation for health and well-being. We reinvigorated this framework to spur a comprehensive account of stigma's impact by classifying 93 stigmas along these dimensions. With the input of expert and general public raters, we then located these stigmas in a six-dimensional space and created discrete clusters organized around these dimensions. Next, we linked this taxonomy to health and stigma-related mechanisms. This quantitative taxonomy offers parsimonious insights into the relationship among the numerous qualities of numerous stigmas and health.
大多数人都曾在某个时刻受到污名化。然而,研究通常分别研究污名,从而低估了污名的整体影响,并妨碍了对不同污名化身份和状况的比较。在他们的经典著作《社会污名:有标记关系的心理学》中,爱德华·琼斯(Edward Jones)和同事们通过考虑污名的共同维度特征:美学、可隐藏性、过程、破坏性、起源和危险,为统一不同污名的研究奠定了基础。尽管这个框架很突出,但没有研究记录这些污名在这些维度上的差异程度,以及这种变化对健康和幸福的影响。我们重新激活了这个框架,通过沿着这些维度对 93 种污名进行分类,来全面说明污名的影响。然后,我们在一个六维空间中定位这些污名,并围绕这些维度创建离散的聚类。接下来,我们将这个分类法与健康和与污名相关的机制联系起来。这个定量分类法为众多污名的众多特性与健康之间的关系提供了简洁的见解。