• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
From number sense to number symbols. An archaeological perspective.从数感到数字符号。考古学视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 19;373(1740). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0518.
2
Inspecting human evolution from a cave. Late Neanderthals and early sapiens at Grotta di Fumane: present state and outlook.从洞穴考察人类进化。富马尼洞穴的晚期尼安德特人和早期智人:现状与展望。
J Anthropol Sci. 2022 Dec 30;100:71-107. doi: 10.4436/JASS.10016.
3
The first Neanderthal remains from an open-air Middle Palaeolithic site in the Levant.黎凡特地区露天中更新世遗址出土的首例尼安德特人遗骸。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 7;7(1):2958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03025-z.
4
s and the evolutionary origins of ritual in .和仪式的进化起源。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 17;375(1805):20190424. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0424. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
A decorated raven bone from the Zaskalnaya VI (Kolosovskaya) Neanderthal site, Crimea.一块来自克里米亚扎斯卡尼亚六世(科洛索夫斯卡亚)尼安德特人遗址的装饰过的乌鸦骨头。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 29;12(3):e0173435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173435. eCollection 2017.
6
Archaeological evidence for two culture diverse Neanderthal populations in the North Caucasus and contacts between them.北高加索地区存在两种文化迥异的尼安德特人群体的考古证据,以及它们之间的接触。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0284093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284093. eCollection 2023.
7
Muscle recruitment and stone tool use ergonomics across three million years of Palaeolithic technological transitions.跨越三百万年旧石器技术变迁的肌肉募集和石器工具使用人体工程学。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jul;144:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102796. Epub 2020 May 26.
8
Neanderthal infant and adult infracranial remains from Marillac (Charente, France).来自法国夏朗德省马里亚克的尼安德特人婴儿和成人颅下遗骸。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Sep;155(1):99-113. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22557. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
9
Evidence for a (15)N positive excursion in terrestrial foodwebs at the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in south-western France: Implications for early modern human palaeodiet and palaeoenvironment.法国西南部旧石器时代中晚期过渡阶段陆地食物网中氮-15正偏移的证据:对早期现代人古饮食和古环境的启示。
J Hum Evol. 2014 Apr;69:31-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
10
How did Neanderthals and other ancient humans learn to count?尼安德特人和其他古代人类是如何学会计数的?
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7861):22-25. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01429-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying potential palaeolithic artificial memory systems via Spatial statistics: Implications for the origin of quantification.通过空间统计识别潜在的旧石器时代人工记忆系统:对量化起源的启示
Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2025;17(8):171. doi: 10.1007/s12520-025-02286-4. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
An empirically-based scenario for the evolution of cultural transmission in the human lineage during the last 3.3 million years.一个基于实证的关于过去330万年间人类谱系中文化传播演变的设想。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 4;20(6):e0325059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325059. eCollection 2025.
3
Tangled Physics: Knots Strain Intuitive Physical Reasoning.纠结的物理学:纽结考验直观物理推理。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Sep 23;8:1170-1190. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00159. eCollection 2024.
4
Multiproxy analysis of Upper Palaeolithic lustrous gravels supports their anthropogenic use.对旧石器时代晚期光亮砾石的多元分析支持了其被人为使用的说法。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 1;18(11):e0291552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291552. eCollection 2023.
5
Symbolic innovation at the onset of the Upper Paleolithic in Eurasia shown by the personal ornaments from Tolbor-21 (Mongolia).欧亚地区旧石器时代晚期初期的象征性创新体现在托卜鲁尔-21(蒙古)的个人饰品上。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 12;13(1):9545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36140-1.
6
A 39,600-year-old leather punch board from Canyars, Gavà, Spain.西班牙加瓦的卡尼亚斯出土的一块 39600 年前的皮革穿孔板。
Sci Adv. 2023 Apr 14;9(15):eadg0834. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg0834. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
7
What made us "hunter-gatherers of words".是什么使我们成为“词汇的采集者”。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 9;17:1080861. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1080861. eCollection 2023.
8
A cultural evolutionary theory that explains both gradual and punctuated change.一种既能解释渐变又能解释突变速变的文化进化理论。
J R Soc Interface. 2022 Nov;19(196):20220570. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0570. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
9
The Challenge of Modeling the Acquisition of Mathematical Concepts.数学概念习得建模的挑战。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 20;14:100. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00100. eCollection 2020.
10
What Early Sapiens Cognition Can Teach Us: Untangling Cultural Influences on Human Cognition Across Time.早期智人的认知能教会我们什么:理清文化对人类认知的跨时间影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;11:99. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00099. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Bonobo anatomy reveals stasis and mosaicism in chimpanzee evolution, and supports bonobos as the most appropriate extant model for the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans.倭黑猩猩的解剖结构揭示了黑猩猩进化中的停滞和镶嵌现象,并支持将倭黑猩猩作为黑猩猩和人类共同祖先的最合适现存模式。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 4;7(1):608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00548-3.
2
A decorated raven bone from the Zaskalnaya VI (Kolosovskaya) Neanderthal site, Crimea.一块来自克里米亚扎斯卡尼亚六世(科洛索夫斯卡亚)尼安德特人遗址的装饰过的乌鸦骨头。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 29;12(3):e0173435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173435. eCollection 2017.
3
Earliest evidence of personal ornaments associated with burial: the Conus shells from Border Cave.与墓葬相关的个人装饰品的最早证据:来自边境洞穴的芋螺壳。
J Hum Evol. 2016 Apr;93:91-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
4
Monkeys display classic signatures of human symbolic arithmetic.猴子表现出人类符号算术的经典特征。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Mar;19(2):405-15. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0942-5. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
5
Neither chimpanzee nor human, Ardipithecus reveals the surprising ancestry of both.地猿既非黑猩猩也非人类,却揭示了二者惊人的祖先关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 21;112(16):4877-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403659111.
6
Animal cognition. Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans' mental number line.动物认知。新生小鸡的数字-空间映射类似于人类的心理数字线。
Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):534-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1379.
7
Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving.直立人在爪哇的特里尼尔使用贝壳进行工具制作和雕刻。
Nature. 2015 Feb 12;518(7538):228-31. doi: 10.1038/nature13962. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
Neanderthal infant and adult infracranial remains from Marillac (Charente, France).来自法国夏朗德省马里亚克的尼安德特人婴儿和成人颅下遗骸。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Sep;155(1):99-113. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22557. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
9
Human infants' preference for left-to-right oriented increasing numerical sequences.人类婴儿对从左到右递增的数字序列的偏好。
PLoS One. 2014 May 6;9(5):e96412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096412. eCollection 2014.
10
Evolution of life history and behavior in Hominidae: towards phylogenetic reconstruction of the chimpanzee-human last common ancestor.人科生命史和行为的演化:对黑猩猩-人类最近共同祖先的系统发育重建。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Oct;65(4):424-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

从数感到数字符号。考古学视角。

From number sense to number symbols. An archaeological perspective.

机构信息

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 5199 - PACEA, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France

SFF Centre for Early Sapiens Behaviour (SapienCE), University of Bergen, Øysteinsgate 3, Postboks 7805, 5020, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 19;373(1740). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0518.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2016.0518
PMID:29292345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5784044/
Abstract

How and when did hominins move from the numerical cognition that we share with the rest of the animal world to number symbols? Objects with sequential markings have been used to store and retrieve numerical information since the beginning of the European Upper Palaeolithic (42 ka). An increase in the number of markings and complexity of coding is observed towards the end of this period. The application of new analytical techniques to a 44-42 ka old notched baboon fibula from Border Cave, South Africa, shows that notches were added to this bone at different times, suggesting that devices to store numerical information were in use before the Upper Palaeolithic. Analysis of a set of incisions on a 72-60 ka old hyena femur from the Les Pradelles Mousterian site, France, indicates, by comparison with markings produced by modern subjects under similar constraints, that the incisions on the Les Pradelles bone may have been produced to record, in a single session, homologous units of numerical information. This finding supports the view that numerical notations were in use among archaic hominins. Based on these findings, a testable five-stage scenario is proposed to establish how prehistoric cultures have moved from number sense to the use of number symbols.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The origins of numerical abilities'.

摘要

人类是如何以及何时从与动物世界共有的数字认知发展到数字符号的?自欧洲旧石器时代晚期(42 千年前)开始,具有顺序标记的物体就被用于存储和检索数字信息。在这个时期结束时,标记的数量和编码的复杂性都有所增加。南非边境洞穴的 44-42 千年前的带有缺口的狒狒腓骨,应用新的分析技术进行分析,表明这些骨头上的缺口是在不同时间添加的,这表明在旧石器时代之前就已经使用了存储数字信息的设备。对法国莱斯普拉代勒斯莫斯特遗址的 72-60 千年前的鬣狗股骨上的一组切口进行分析,通过与现代主体在类似约束下产生的标记进行比较,表明莱斯普拉代勒斯骨头上的切口可能是为了在单个会话中记录同源的数字信息单位而产生的。这一发现支持了这样一种观点,即数字符号在古人类中已经被使用。基于这些发现,提出了一个可测试的五阶段情景,以确定史前文化是如何从数字意识发展到使用数字符号的。本文是讨论会议议题“数字能力的起源”的一部分。