From the Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Department of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):826-832. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002765.
Routine monitoring of postoperative patients with pulse oximetry-based surveillance monitoring has been shown to reduce adverse events. However, there is some concern that pulse oximetry is limited in its ability to detect deterioration quickly enough to allow for intervention in patients receiving supplemental oxygen. To address such concerns, this study expands on the current limited knowledge of differences in desaturation and respiratory rate characteristics between patients breathing room air and those receiving supplemental oxygen.
Pulse oximetry-derived data and patient characteristics were used to examine overnight desaturation patterns of 67 postoperative patients who were receiving either supplemental oxygen or breathing room air. The 2 modalities with respect to the speed of desaturation, in addition to magnitude and duration of desaturation events, are compared. Night-time pulse rate, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and the transition times from normal oxygen saturation levels to desaturated states are also compared. The behavior of respiratory rate in proximity to desaturation events is described. Statistical methods included multivariable regression and inverse probability of treatment weighted to adjust for any imbalance in patient characteristics between the oxygen and room air patients and linear mixed effect models to account for clustering by patient.
The study included 33 patients on room air and 34 receiving supplemental oxygen. The speed of desaturation was not different for room air versus oxygen for 2 types of desaturation (adjusted % difference, 95% confidence interval [CI]: type I; 22.4%, -51.5% to 209%; P = .67, type II; -17.3%, -53.8% to 47.6%; P = .52). Patients receiving supplemental oxygen had a higher mean oxygen saturation (adjusted difference, 95% CI, 2.4 [0.7-4.0]; P = .006). No differences were found for the average overnight respiratory or pulse rate, or proportion of time in desaturation states between the 2 groups.The time to transition from a normal oxygen saturation (92%) to 88% or below was not longer for supplemental oxygen patients (P = .42, adjusted difference 26.1%: 95% CI, -28.1% to 121%). Respiratory rates did not differ between the overall mean and desaturation or recovery phases or between the oxygen and room air group.
In this study, desaturation characteristics did not differ between patients receiving supplemental oxygen and breathing room air with regard to speed, depth, or duration of desaturation. Transition time for desaturations to reach low oxygen saturation alarms was not different, while respiratory rate remained in the normal range during these events. These findings suggest that pulse oximetry-based surveillance monitoring for deterioration detection can be used equally effectively for patients on supplemental oxygen and for those on room air.
基于脉搏血氧监测的术后患者常规监测已被证明可降低不良事件的发生。然而,人们担心脉搏血氧仪在检测到患者恶化并及时进行干预方面的能力有限,尤其是在患者接受补充氧气的情况下。为了解决这些问题,本研究扩展了目前关于接受补充氧气和呼吸室内空气的患者之间在脱氧和呼吸率特征方面差异的有限知识。
使用脉搏血氧仪衍生的数据和患者特征,检查了 67 名术后患者的夜间脱氧模式,这些患者分别接受补充氧气或呼吸室内空气。比较了两种模式在脱氧速度、脱氧事件的幅度和持续时间方面的差异。还比较了夜间脉搏率、氧饱和度、呼吸率以及从正常氧饱和度水平过渡到脱氧状态的时间。描述了呼吸率在接近脱氧事件时的行为。统计方法包括多变量回归和治疗反概率加权,以调整补充氧气和呼吸室内空气患者之间的任何患者特征不平衡,并使用线性混合效应模型来解释患者聚类的影响。
该研究包括 33 名在室内空气和 34 名接受补充氧气的患者。对于两种类型的脱氧,室内空气与氧气的脱氧速度没有差异(调整后的差异百分比,95%置信区间[CI]:I 型,22.4%,-51.5%至 209%;P=.67,II 型,-17.3%,-53.8%至 47.6%;P=.52)。接受补充氧气的患者平均氧饱和度更高(调整差异,95%CI,2.4[0.7-4.0];P=.006)。两组之间的平均夜间呼吸或脉搏率或脱氧状态时间比例没有差异。从正常氧饱和度(92%)过渡到 88%或以下的时间对补充氧气的患者来说并不长(P=.42,调整差异 26.1%:95%CI,-28.1%至 121%)。呼吸率在整体平均值和脱氧或恢复阶段之间以及在氧气和室内空气组之间没有差异。
在这项研究中,接受补充氧气和呼吸室内空气的患者在脱氧速度、深度或持续时间方面的脱氧特征没有差异。达到低氧饱和度警报的脱氧过渡时间没有差异,而呼吸率在这些事件期间仍保持在正常范围内。这些发现表明,基于脉搏血氧监测的恶化检测可以同样有效地用于接受补充氧气的患者和接受室内空气的患者。