Lévy Simon, Guertin Marie-Claude, Khatibi Ali, Mezer Aviv, Martinu Kristina, Chen Jen-I, Stikov Nikola, Rainville Pierre, Cohen-Adad Julien
NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), Montréal, QC, Canada.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189944. eCollection 2018.
To implement a statistical framework for assessing the precision of several quantitative MRI metrics sensitive to myelin in the human spinal cord: T1, Magnetization Transfer Ratio (MTR), saturation imposed by an off-resonance pulse (MTsat) and Macromolecular Tissue Volume (MTV).
Thirty-three healthy subjects within two age groups (young, elderly) were scanned at 3T. Among them, 16 underwent the protocol twice to assess repeatability. Statistical reliability indexes such as the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) were compared across metrics quantified within different cervical levels and white matter (WM) sub-regions. The differences between pathways and age groups were quantified and interpreted in context of the test-retest repeatability of the measurements.
The MDC was respectively 105.7ms, 2.77%, 0.37% and 4.08% for T1, MTR, MTsat and MTV when quantified over all WM, while the standard-deviation across subjects was 70.5ms, 1.34%, 0.20% and 2.44%. Even though particular WM regions did exhibit significant differences, these differences were on the same order as test-retest errors. No significant difference was found between age groups for all metrics.
While T1-based metrics (T1 and MTV) exhibited better reliability than MT-based measurements (MTR and MTsat), the observed differences between subjects or WM regions were comparable to (and often smaller than) the MDC. This makes it difficult to determine if observed changes are due to variations in myelin content, or simply due to measurement error. Measurement error remains a challenge in spinal cord myelin imaging, but this study provides statistical guidelines to standardize the field and make it possible to conduct large-scale multi-center studies.
建立一个统计框架,用于评估几种对人类脊髓髓鞘敏感的定量磁共振成像(MRI)指标的精度:T1、磁化传递率(MTR)、失谐脉冲施加的饱和度(MTsat)和大分子组织体积(MTV)。
对两个年龄组(年轻组、老年组)的33名健康受试者进行3T扫描。其中16名受试者进行了两次扫描以评估重复性。比较了不同颈椎水平和白质(WM)子区域量化指标之间的统计可靠性指标,如最小可检测变化(MDC)。在测量的重测重复性背景下,对不同年龄组和通路之间的差异进行了量化和解释。
在所有WM上进行量化时,T1、MTR、MTsat和MTV的MDC分别为105.7ms、2.77%、0.37%和4.08%,而受试者之间的标准差分别为70.5ms、1.34%、0.20%和2.44%。尽管特定的WM区域确实存在显著差异,但这些差异与重测误差处于同一量级。所有指标在不同年龄组之间均未发现显著差异。
虽然基于T1的指标(T1和MTV)比基于MT的测量指标(MTR和MTsat)表现出更好的可靠性,但受试者或WM区域之间观察到的差异与MDC相当(且通常小于MDC)。这使得难以确定观察到的变化是由于髓鞘含量的变化,还是仅仅由于测量误差。测量误差仍然是脊髓髓鞘成像中的一个挑战,但本研究提供了统计指南,以规范该领域并使大规模多中心研究成为可能。