Spick Claudio, Szolar Dieter H M, Preidler Klaus W, Reittner Pia, Rauch Katharina, Brader Peter, Tillich Manfred, Baltzer Pascal A
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna (AKH), Vienna, Austria.
Diagnostikum Graz, Graz, Austria.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190287. eCollection 2018.
To investigate the diagnostic performance and incidental lesion yield of 3T breast MRI if used as a problem-solving tool.
This retrospective, IRB-approved, cross-sectional, single-center study comprised 302 consecutive women (mean: 50±12 years; range: 20-79 years) who were undergoing 3T breast MRI between 03/2013-12/2014 for further workup of conventional and clinical breast findings. Images were read by experienced, board-certified radiologists. The reference standard was histopathology or follow-up ≥ two years. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated. Results were stratified by conventional and clinical breast findings.
The reference standard revealed 53 true-positive, 243 true-negative, 20 false-positive, and two false-negative breast MRI findings, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 96.4% (53/55), 92.4% (243/263), 72.6% (53/73), and 99.2% (243/245), respectively. In 5.3% (16/302) of all patients, incidental MRI lesions classified BI-RADS 3-5 were detected, 37.5% (6/16) of which were malignant. Breast composition and the imaging findings that had led to referral had no significant influence on the diagnostic performance of breast MR imaging (p>0.05).
3T breast MRI yields excellent diagnostic results if used as a problem-solving tool independent of referral reasons. The number of suspicious incidental lesions detected by MRI is low, but is associated with a substantial malignancy rate.
探讨3T乳腺MRI作为问题解决工具时的诊断性能及偶然病变检出率。
这项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性、横断面、单中心研究纳入了2013年3月至2014年12月期间连续接受3T乳腺MRI检查以进一步评估传统乳腺检查及临床乳腺发现的302名女性(平均年龄:50±12岁;范围:20 - 79岁)。图像由经验丰富、获得委员会认证的放射科医生阅片。参考标准为组织病理学检查或随访≥两年。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果按传统乳腺检查及临床乳腺发现进行分层。
参考标准显示乳腺MRI检查结果中有53例假阳性、243例假阴性、20例假阳性和2例假阴性,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为96.4%(53/55)、92.4%(243/263)、72.6%(53/73)和99.2%(243/245)。在所有患者的5.3%(16/302)中,检测到分类为BI - RADS 3 - 5级的偶然MRI病变,其中37.5%(6/16)为恶性。乳腺组成以及导致转诊的影像学发现对乳腺MRI诊断性能无显著影响(p>0.05)。
3T乳腺MRI作为问题解决工具时,无论转诊原因如何,均能产生出色的诊断结果。MRI检测到的可疑偶然病变数量较少,但恶性率较高。