Spick Claudio, Szolar Dieter H M, Preidler Klaus W, Tillich Manfred, Reittner Pia, Baltzer Pascal A
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna (AKH), Waehringer-Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Diagnostikum Graz-Südwest, Weblinger Guertel 25, 8054 Graz, Austria.
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jan;84(1):61-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of breast MRI if used as a problem-solving tool in BI-RADS 0 cases.
In this IRB-approved, single-center study, 687 women underwent high-resolution-3D, dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between January 2012 and December 2012. Of these, we analyzed 111 consecutive patients (mean age, 51 ± 12 years; range, 20-83 years) categorized as BI-RADS 0. Breast MRI findings were stratified by clinical presentations, conventional imaging findings, and breast density. MRI results were compared to the reference standard, defined as histopathology or an imaging follow-up of at least 1 year.
One hundred eleven patients with BI-RADS 0 conventional imaging findings revealed 30 (27%) mammographic masses, 57 (51.4%) mammographic architectural distortions, five (4.5%) mammographic microcalcifications, 17 (15.3%) ultrasound-only findings, and two palpable findings without imaging correlates. There were 15 true-positive, 85 true-negative, 11 false-positive, and zero false-negative breast MRI findings, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100% (15/15), 88.5% (85/96), 57.7% (15/26), and 100% (85/85), respectively. Breast density and reasons for referral had no significant influence on the diagnostic performance of breast MRI (p>0.05).
Breast MRI reliably excludes malignancy in conventional BI-RADS 0 cases resulting in a NPV of 100% (85/85) and a PPV of 57.7% (15/26).
评估乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)作为BI-RADS 0类病例问题解决工具时的诊断性能。
在这项经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的单中心研究中,2012年1月至2012年12月期间,687名女性接受了高分辨率三维动态对比增强乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)检查。其中,我们分析了连续的111例被归类为BI-RADS 0类的患者(平均年龄51±12岁;范围20-83岁)。乳腺MRI检查结果按临床表现、传统影像学检查结果和乳腺密度进行分层。将MRI结果与参考标准进行比较,参考标准定义为组织病理学检查或至少1年的影像学随访。
111例具有BI-RADS 0类传统影像学检查结果的患者中,乳腺钼靶检查发现30例(27%)肿块,57例(51.4%)结构扭曲,5例(4.5%)微钙化,17例(15.3%)仅超声检查发现的病变,以及2例可触及但无影像学对应表现的病变。乳腺MRI检查结果有15例假阳性、85例假阴性、11例假阳性和0例假阴性,灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%(15/15)、88.5%(85/96)、57.7%(15/26)和100%(85/85)。乳腺密度和转诊原因对乳腺MRI的诊断性能无显著影响(p>0.05)。
乳腺MRI在传统BI-RADS 0类病例中能可靠地排除恶性病变,阴性预测值为100%(8,5/85),阳性预测值为57.7%(15/26)。