Department of Radiology, Jewish General Hospital, Room C-212.1, 3755 Cote Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2604-2611. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5214-0. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
There is a rich amount of quantitative information in spectral datasets generated from dual-energy CT (DECT). In this study, we compare the performance of texture analysis performed on multi-energy datasets to that of virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) at 65 keV only, using classification of the two most common benign parotid neoplasms as a testing paradigm.
Forty-two patients with pathologically proven Warthin tumour (n = 25) or pleomorphic adenoma (n = 17) were evaluated. Texture analysis was performed on VMIs ranging from 40 to 140 keV in 5-keV increments (multi-energy analysis) or 65-keV VMIs only, which is typically considered equivalent to single-energy CT. Random forest (RF) models were constructed for outcome prediction using separate randomly selected training and testing sets or the entire patient set.
Using multi-energy texture analysis, tumour classification in the independent testing set had accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 92%, 86%, 100%, 100%, and 83%, compared to 75%, 57%, 100%, 100%, and 63%, respectively, for single-energy analysis.
Multi-energy texture analysis demonstrates superior performance compared to single-energy texture analysis of VMIs at 65 keV for classification of benign parotid tumours.
• We present and validate a paradigm for texture analysis of DECT scans. • Multi-energy dataset texture analysis is superior to single-energy dataset texture analysis. • DECT texture analysis has high accura\cy for diagnosis of benign parotid tumours. • DECT texture analysis with machine learning can enhance non-invasive diagnostic tumour evaluation.
双能 CT(DECT)生成的光谱数据集中包含大量定量信息。本研究通过对比两种最常见的良性腮腺肿瘤的分类,比较了多能量数据集和仅 65keV 虚拟单色图像(VMIs)的纹理分析性能。
对 42 例经病理证实的沃辛瘤(n=25)或多形性腺瘤(n=17)患者进行评估。在 40keV 到 140keV 之间以 5keV 为增量(多能量分析)或仅在 65keV VMIs 上进行纹理分析,后者通常被认为等同于单能 CT。使用随机森林(RF)模型,通过分别随机选择的训练和测试集或整个患者集来构建用于预测结果的模型。
在独立测试集中,使用多能量纹理分析时,肿瘤分类的准确率、敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 92%、86%、100%、100%和 83%,而单能量分析的准确率、敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 75%、57%、100%、100%和 63%。
与 65keV 单能量 VMIs 的纹理分析相比,多能量纹理分析在良性腮腺肿瘤的分类中表现出更好的性能。
• 我们提出并验证了一种 DECT 扫描纹理分析的范例。• 多能量数据集纹理分析优于单能量数据集纹理分析。• DECT 纹理分析对诊断良性腮腺肿瘤具有很高的准确性。• 机器学习辅助的 DECT 纹理分析可以增强非侵入性的肿瘤诊断评估。