Rao Yilin, Ma Yuxi, Wang Jinghan, Xiao Weiwei, Wu Jiaqi, Shi Liang, Guo Ling, Fan Liyuan
Department of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Luzhou Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 25;14:1383323. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1383323. eCollection 2024.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic precision of radiomics in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors, considering the increasing utilization of radiomics in tumor diagnosis. Although some researchers have attempted to apply radiomics in this context, there is ongoing debate regarding its accuracy.
Databases of PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to May 29, 2024 were systematically searched. The quality of included primary studies was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) checklist. The meta-analysis was performed utilizing a bivariate mixed-effects model.
A total of 39 primary studies were incorporated. The machine learning model relying on MRI radiomics for diagnosis malignant tumors of the parotid gland, demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.86], SROC of 0.89 [95% CI: 0.27-0.99] in the validation set. The machine learning model based on MRI radiomics for diagnosis malignant tumors of the parotid gland, exhibited a sensitivity of 0.83[95% CI: 0.76, 0.88], SROC of 0.89 [95% CI: 0.17-1.00] in the validation set. The models also demonstrated high predictive accuracy for benign lesions.
There is great potential for radiomics-based models to improve the accuracy of diagnosing benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland. To further enhance this potential, future studies should consider implementing standardized radiomics-based features, adopting more robust feature selection methods, and utilizing advanced model development tools. These measures can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023434931.
鉴于放射组学在肿瘤诊断中的应用日益增加,进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估放射组学在腮腺肿瘤鉴别诊断中的诊断准确性。尽管一些研究人员已尝试在此背景下应用放射组学,但其准确性仍存在争议。
系统检索截至2024年5月29日的PubMed、Cochrane、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库。使用放射组学质量评分(RQS)清单评估纳入的原始研究的质量。采用双变量混合效应模型进行荟萃分析。
共纳入39项原始研究。基于MRI放射组学的机器学习模型用于诊断腮腺恶性肿瘤,在验证集中显示出0.80的敏感性[95%CI:0.74,0.86],SROC为0.89[95%CI:0.27 - 0.99]。基于MRI放射组学的机器学习模型用于诊断腮腺恶性肿瘤,在验证集中表现出0.83的敏感性[95%CI:0.76,0.88],SROC为0.89[95%CI:0.17 - 1.00]。这些模型对良性病变也显示出较高的预测准确性。
基于放射组学的模型在提高腮腺良恶性肿瘤诊断准确性方面具有巨大潜力。为进一步增强这一潜力,未来研究应考虑采用标准化的基于放射组学的特征,采用更稳健的特征选择方法,并利用先进的模型开发工具。这些措施可显著提高人工智能算法在鉴别腮腺良恶性肿瘤方面的诊断准确性。