Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
The University of Toledo, OH, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):5853-5876. doi: 10.1177/0886260517724252. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
Prior research has examined how posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms are influenced by the experience of different types of rape, defined according to the method of coercion used. This work, which classifies rape experiences as forcible or substance-involved, has yielded mixed findings regarding differences in PTSD symptoms as a function of rape type. Based on recent evidence indicating significant heterogeneity within substance-involved rapes, the present study utilized a novel four-group conceptualization of rape type to examine differences in PTSD symptom severity and associated factors across rape type. Using a sample of 161 community women with experiences of adult rape, we examined four rape types based on method of coercion: forcible-only rape (i.e., involving only force/threat of force; = 48), impaired rape (i.e., substance-related impairment was present, but the participant remained conscious; = 56), combined rape (i.e., both force/threat of force and substance-related impairment were present; = 29), and incapacitated rape (i.e., the participant was intoxicated to the point of unconsciousness; = 28). We compared these groups on PTSD symptom severity within each symptom cluster, as well as on assault characteristics and consequences, including peritraumatic fear and injury, acknowledgment, and self-blame. Combined type rapes were associated with significantly more severe PTSD symptoms than forcible-only and impaired type rapes. Differences among the groups were also found for peritraumatic fear and injury, and rape acknowledgment. Utilizing a dichotomous approach to rape type overlooks the complexity of women's experiences. Differences in PTSD symptom severity as a function of the proposed four-group conceptualization of rape type highlight the importance of assessing method of coercion when treating rape-related PTSD. Likewise, differences across rape types in peritraumatic fear and rape acknowledgment highlight the potential utility of type-specific targets of intervention.
先前的研究已经考察了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状如何受到不同类型强奸经历的影响,这些强奸经历是根据使用的强制手段来定义的。这项工作将强奸经历分为强迫性或涉及物质的,关于作为强奸类型函数的 PTSD 症状差异得出了混合的结果。基于最近表明涉及物质的强奸中存在显著异质性的证据,本研究利用一种新颖的四组强奸类型概念化来检查不同类型的强奸中 PTSD 症状严重程度和相关因素的差异。使用 161 名经历过成人强奸的社区女性样本,我们根据强制手段检验了四种强奸类型:仅强迫性强奸(即仅涉及武力/武力威胁;=48)、受损性强奸(即存在与物质相关的损伤,但参与者保持清醒;=56)、混合性强奸(即同时存在武力/武力威胁和与物质相关的损伤;=29)和无力反抗性强奸(即参与者醉酒至无意识状态;=28)。我们比较了这些组在每个症状群中的 PTSD 症状严重程度,以及在攻击特征和后果方面,包括创伤前恐惧和损伤、承认和自责。与仅强迫性和受损性强奸相比,混合性强奸与更严重的 PTSD 症状相关。在创伤前恐惧和损伤以及强奸承认方面,各组之间也存在差异。强奸类型的二分法方法忽略了女性经历的复杂性。基于所提出的四组强奸类型概念化的 PTSD 症状严重程度的差异突出了在治疗与强奸相关的 PTSD 时评估强制手段的重要性。同样,在创伤前恐惧和强奸承认方面,不同类型的强奸之间的差异突出了针对特定类型的干预目标的潜在效用。