Petruzzellis Francesco, Palandrani Chiara, Savi Tadeja, Alberti Roberto, Nardini Andrea, Bacaro Giovanni
Department of Life Sciences University of Trieste Trieste Italy.
Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences University of Udine Udine Italy.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov 21;7(24):11236-11245. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3617. eCollection 2017 Dec.
The choice of the best sampling strategy to capture mean values of functional traits for a species/population, while maintaining information about traits' variability and minimizing the sampling size and effort, is an open issue in functional trait ecology. Intraspecific variability (ITV) of functional traits strongly influences sampling size and effort. However, while adequate information is available about intraspecific variability between individuals (ITV) and among populations (ITV), relatively few studies have analyzed intraspecific variability within individuals (ITV). Here, we provide an analysis of ITV of two foliar traits, namely specific leaf area (SLA) and osmotic potential (π), in a population of L. We assessed the baseline ITV level of variation between the two traits and provided the minimum and optimal sampling size in order to take into account ITV, comparing sampling optimization outputs with those previously proposed in the literature. Different factors accounted for different amount of variance of the two traits. SLA variance was mostly spread within individuals (43.4% of the total variance), while π variance was mainly spread between individuals (43.2%). Strategies that did not account for all the canopy strata produced mean values not representative of the sampled population. The minimum size to adequately capture the studied functional traits corresponded to 5 leaves taken randomly from 5 individuals, while the most accurate and feasible sampling size was 4 leaves taken randomly from 10 individuals. We demonstrate that the spatial structure of the canopy could significantly affect traits variability. Moreover, different strategies for different traits could be implemented during sampling surveys. We partially confirm sampling sizes previously proposed in the recent literature and encourage future analysis involving different traits.
在功能性状生态学中,如何选择最佳抽样策略来获取物种/种群功能性状的平均值,同时保留有关性状变异性的信息并最小化抽样规模和工作量,这仍是一个悬而未决的问题。功能性状的种内变异性(ITV)强烈影响抽样规模和工作量。然而,尽管已有关于个体间(ITV)和种群间(ITV)种内变异性的充分信息,但相对较少的研究分析了个体内的种内变异性(ITV)。在此,我们对L种群中两个叶片性状的ITV进行了分析,这两个性状分别是比叶面积(SLA)和渗透势(π)。我们评估了这两个性状之间变异的基线ITV水平,并给出了最小和最佳抽样规模,以便考虑ITV,同时将抽样优化结果与文献中先前提出的结果进行比较。不同因素解释了这两个性状不同程度的方差。SLA的方差大多分布在个体内(占总方差的43.4%),而π的方差主要分布在个体间(43.2%)。未考虑所有冠层的抽样策略得出的平均值不能代表所抽样的种群。充分获取所研究功能性状的最小样本量相当于从5个个体中随机选取5片叶子,而最准确且可行的抽样规模是从10个个体中随机选取4片叶子。我们证明冠层的空间结构会显著影响性状变异性。此外,在抽样调查期间可以针对不同性状实施不同策略。我们部分证实了近期文献中先前提出的抽样规模,并鼓励未来开展涉及不同性状的分析。