Suppr超能文献

评估蜣螂功能性状种内变异性的重要性。

Assessing the Importance of Intraspecific Variability in Dung Beetle Functional Traits.

作者信息

Griffiths Hannah M, Louzada Julio, Bardgett Richard D, Barlow Jos

机构信息

Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom.

Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, 37200-000, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 3;11(3):e0145598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145598. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Functional diversity indices are used to facilitate a mechanistic understanding of many theoretical and applied questions in current ecological research. The use of mean trait values in functional indices assumes that traits are robust, in that greater variability exists between than within species. While the assertion of robust traits has been explored in plants, there exists little information on the source and extent of variability in the functional traits of higher trophic level organisms. Here we investigated variability in two functionally relevant dung beetle traits, measured from individuals collected from three primary forest sites containing distinct beetle communities: body mass and back leg length. In doing so we too addressed the following questions: (i) what is the contribution of intra vs. interspecific differences in trait values; (ii) what sample size is needed to provide representative species mean trait values; and (iii) what impact does omission of intraspecific trait information have on the calculation of functional diversity (FD) indices from naturally assembled communities? At the population level, interspecific differences explained the majority of variability in measured traits (between 94% and 96%). In accordance with this, the error associated with calculating FD without inclusion of intraspecific variability was low, less than 20% in all cases. This suggests that complete sampling to capture intraspecific variance in traits is not necessary even when investigating the FD of small and/or naturally formed communities. To gain an accurate estimation of species mean trait values we encourage the measurement of 30-60 individuals and, where possible, these should be taken from specimens collected from the site of study.

摘要

功能多样性指数用于促进对当前生态研究中许多理论和应用问题的机理理解。在功能指数中使用平均性状值假设性状是稳健的,即物种间的变异性大于物种内的变异性。虽然已在植物中探讨了稳健性状的断言,但关于较高营养级生物功能性状变异性的来源和程度的信息却很少。在这里,我们研究了两种与功能相关的蜣螂性状的变异性,这些性状是从三个包含不同甲虫群落的原始森林地点采集的个体中测量得到的:体重和后腿长度。在此过程中,我们还解决了以下问题:(i)性状值的种内差异与种间差异的贡献是什么;(ii)需要多大的样本量才能提供具有代表性的物种平均性状值;(iii)忽略种内性状信息对从自然组装群落计算功能多样性(FD)指数有什么影响?在种群水平上,种间差异解释了测量性状中大部分的变异性(94%至96%)。据此,在不包含种内变异性的情况下计算FD所产生的误差较低,在所有情况下均小于20%。这表明,即使在研究小型和/或自然形成的群落的FD时,也没有必要进行完全采样以捕获性状的种内方差。为了准确估计物种平均性状值,我们建议测量30至60个个体,并且在可能的情况下,这些个体应取自从研究地点采集的标本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05a8/4777568/3fa35fd3e323/pone.0145598.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验