Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Australian Collaboration for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention, Federation University Australia, Lydird Street South, Ballarat, VIC, 3350, Australia.
Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):849-866. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0839-3.
To commence injury prevention efforts, it is necessary to understand the magnitude of the injury problem. No systematic reviews have yet investigated the extent of injuries in field hockey, despite the popularity of the sport worldwide.
Our objective was to describe the rate and severity of injuries in field hockey and investigate their characteristics.
We conducted electronic searches in PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL. Prospective cohort studies were included if they were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal and observed all possible injuries sustained by field hockey players during the period of the study.
The risk of bias score of the 22 studies included ranged from three to nine of a possible ten. In total, 12 studies (55%) reported injuries normalized by field hockey exposure. Injury rates ranged from 0.1 injuries (in school-aged players) to 90.9 injuries (in Africa Cup of Nations) per 1000 player-hours and from one injury (in high-school women) to 70 injuries (in under-21 age women) per 1000 player-sessions. Studies used different classifications for injury severity, but-within studies-injuries were included mostly in the less severe category. The lower limbs were most affected, and contusions/hematomas and abrasions were common types of injury. Contact injuries are common, but non-contact injuries are also a cause for concern.
Considerable heterogeneity meant it was not possible to draw conclusive findings on the extent of the rate and severity of injuries. Establishing the extent of sports injury is considered the first step towards prevention, so there is a need for a consensus on injury surveillance in field hockey.
要开展伤害预防工作,首先必须了解伤害问题的严重程度。尽管该运动在全球范围内广受欢迎,但尚未有系统评价调查曲棍球运动中的伤害程度。
本研究旨在描述曲棍球运动中的伤害发生率和严重程度,并分析其特征。
我们在 PubMed、Embase、SPORTDiscus 和 CINAHL 中进行了电子检索。如果研究为发表在同行评议期刊上的英文前瞻性队列研究,且观察了研究期间所有可能发生的曲棍球运动员损伤,则纳入本研究。
纳入的 22 项研究的偏倚风险评分范围为 3 至 9 分(满分 10 分)。共有 12 项研究(55%)以曲棍球参与时间校正的损伤发生率进行报告。损伤发生率范围为每 1000 名运动员小时 0.1 次(在学龄期运动员中)至 90.9 次(在非洲国家杯),每 1000 名运动员场次 1 次(在高中女子运动员中)至 70 次(在 21 岁以下女性运动员中)。研究使用了不同的损伤严重程度分类,但在各研究内,损伤大多归入较轻的类别。下肢最易受伤,常见的损伤类型为挫伤/血肿和擦伤。接触伤很常见,但也应关注非接触伤。
由于存在较大的异质性,因此无法就损伤发生率和严重程度的程度得出明确结论。确定运动损伤的程度被认为是预防的第一步,因此有必要在曲棍球运动中建立损伤监测的共识。