Benedicto Eduardo Novaes, Azevedo Alana Cássia Silva, Michel-Crosato Edgard, Biazevic Maria Gabriela Haye
Community Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Universidade de São Paulo - FO-USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Community Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Universidade de São Paulo - FO-USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Feb;283:128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
To validate, analyse accuracy, and construct multiple regression formulae of three age estimation methods - Liliequist and Lundberg, Haavikko, and Mornstad - using mineralization stages of permanent teeth in Brazilians.
Panoramic radiographs of 1009 Brazilian children and adolescents (387 males and 622 females) aged 8-15.99 years were analysed using the aforementioned methodologies.
The overall accuracy (absolute difference=AD and dental age-chronological age=DA-CA) of the methods was as follows: Liliequist and Lundberg, AD=0.97 and DA-CA=-0.58; Haavikko, AD=1.42 and DA-CA=-1.35; and Mornstad, AD=2.48 and DA-CA=0.78. After sex-based stratification, the values for males were as follows: Liliequist and Lundberg, AD=0.91 and DA-CA=-0.45; Haavikko, AD=1.80 and DA-CA=-1.75; and Mornstad, AD=2.74 and DA-CA=1.17. In females, the values were as follows: Liliequist and Lundberg, DA=1.01 and DA-CA=-0.67; Haavikko, AD=1.17 and DA-CA=-1.09; and Mornstad, AD=2.31 and DA-CA=0.53. The Liliequist and Lundberg technique predominated, followed by Haavikko and Mornstad when distinction was present between sex and age. Multiple regression formulae were constructed from the data presented for the Liliequist and Lundberg, Haavikko and Mornstad methodologies.
The validation of the methodologies in the Brazilian population is possible. The Liliequist and Lundberg method most closely represented the Brazilian sample.
利用巴西人恒牙的矿化阶段,验证、分析三种年龄估计方法(利利奎斯特和伦德伯格法、哈维科法、莫恩斯塔德法)的准确性,并构建多元回归公式。
采用上述方法分析了1009名8至15.99岁巴西儿童和青少年(387名男性和622名女性)的全景X线片。
这些方法的总体准确性(绝对差值=AD,牙龄-实足年龄=DA-CA)如下:利利奎斯特和伦德伯格法,AD=0.97,DA-CA=-0.58;哈维科法,AD=1.42,DA-CA=-1.35;莫恩斯塔德法,AD=2.48,DA-CA=0.78。按性别分层后,男性的数值如下:利利奎斯特和伦德伯格法,AD=0.91,DA-CA=-0.45;哈维科法,AD=1.80,DA-CA=-1.75;莫恩斯塔德法,AD=2.74,DA-CA=1.17。女性的数值如下:利利奎斯特和伦德伯格法,DA=1.01,DA-CA=-0.67;哈维科法,AD=1.17,DA-CA=-1.09;莫恩斯塔德法,AD=2.31,DA-CA=0.53。当性别和年龄存在差异时,利利奎斯特和伦德伯格技术占主导地位,其次是哈维科法和莫恩斯塔德法。根据利利奎斯特和伦德伯格法、哈维科法和莫恩斯塔德法提供的数据构建了多元回归公式。
在巴西人群中对这些方法进行验证是可行的。利利奎斯特和伦德伯格法最能代表巴西样本。