• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Applicability of the Demirjian, Willems and Haavikko methods in Croatian children.德米尔詹、威廉姆斯和哈维科方法在克罗地亚儿童中的适用性。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2022 Aug 30;40(2):21-30.
2
The Cameriere, Haavikko, Demirjian, and Willems methods for the assessment of dental age in Croatian children.卡梅里埃雷、哈维科、德米尔詹和威廉姆斯方法评估克罗地亚儿童的牙龄。
Int J Legal Med. 2022 Nov;136(6):1685-1696. doi: 10.1007/s00414-022-02891-1. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
3
Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth.利用发育中的牙齿进行X线摄影方法的年龄估计准确性
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 May 15;159 Suppl 1:S68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.019. Epub 2006 Mar 14.
4
Accuracy of Cameriere, Haavikko, and Willems radiographic methods on age estimation on Bosnian-Herzegovian children age groups 6-13.Cameriere、Haavikko 和 Willems 放射学方法在估计 6-13 岁波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那儿童年龄组时的准确性。
Int J Legal Med. 2011 Mar;125(2):315-21. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0515-8. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
5
Dental age assessment in 7-14-year-old Chinese children: comparison of Demirjian and Willems methods.7至14岁中国儿童的牙齿年龄评估:Demirjian法与Willems法的比较
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Nov;244:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
6
Radiological Evaluation of the Accuracy of Demirjian, Nolla, and Willems Methods for Dental Age Estimation in 3-17-Year-Old Iranian Children.伊朗儿童 3-17 岁牙龄评估中 Demirjian、Nolla 和 Willems 方法的放射学准确性评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Jul 3;2024:8783660. doi: 10.1155/2024/8783660. eCollection 2024.
7
Accuracy of the Demirjian and Willems methods of dental age estimation for children from central southern China.中国中南部儿童牙齿年龄估计的德米尔坚法和威廉姆斯法的准确性。
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Mar;133(2):593-601. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1924-3. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
8
A comparison of the validity of the Demirjian, Willems, Nolla and Häävikko methods in determination of chronological age of 5-15 year-old Indian children.比较德米尔坚法、威廉姆斯法、诺拉法和哈伊维科法在确定5至15岁印度儿童实际年龄方面的有效性。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Aug;50:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Accuracy of age estimation in children using radiograph of developing teeth.利用发育中牙齿的X光片估计儿童年龄的准确性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Apr 7;176(2-3):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
10
Dental age estimation using Demirjian and Willems methods: cross sectional study on children from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.使用德米尔坚法和威廉姆斯法进行牙龄估计:对前南斯拉夫的马其顿共和国儿童的横断面研究
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Jan;234:187.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
An Evaluation of Four Radiological Methods for Dental Age Estimation in the Montenegrin Population.黑山人群中四种牙科年龄估计放射学方法的评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 13;15(14):1769. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141769.
2
'Shift' Adaptation and a New Croatian Standard for Haavikko Developmental Stages' Timing.“转换”适应与克罗地亚关于哈维科发育阶段时间的新标准
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Dec;58(4):318-328. doi: 10.15644/asc58/4/1.
3
Bibliometric analysis of research on dental age estimation.牙龄评估研究的文献计量分析。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2023 Dec 27;41(3):26-44.
4
Performance of different dental age estimation methods on Saudi children.不同牙齿年龄评估方法在沙特儿童中的表现。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2023 Apr 30;41(1):27-46.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing the accuracy of Bedek et al's new models based on 1-to-7 mandibular teeth for age estimation in 7-15 year old south Indian children.基于1至7颗下颌牙齿,测试贝德克等人的新模型在7至15岁印度南部儿童年龄估计中的准确性。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2020 Sep 30;38(2):22-39.
2
Accuracy of two dental age estimation methods in the Indian population - A meta-analysis of published studies.两种牙科年龄估计方法在印度人群中的准确性——已发表研究的荟萃分析
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2019 Dec 30;37(3):2-11.
3
Forensic age estimation of 85 male child laborers and 31 rescued female commercial sex workers from Hyderabad in South India.对来自印度南部海得拉巴的85名男性童工和31名获救女性商业性工作者进行法医年龄估计。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019 Sep;40:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
4
New model for dental age estimation: Willems method applied on fewer than seven mandibular teeth.一种新的牙齿年龄估计模型:少于七颗下颌牙齿的威廉姆斯法的应用。
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Mar;134(2):735-743. doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02066-5. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Dental age estimation using four Demirjian's, Chaillet's and Willems' methods in Kosovar children.在科索沃儿童中使用四种德米尔坚法、沙耶法和威廉姆斯法进行牙齿年龄估计。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2018 Apr 24;33:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.04.006.
6
Validity and accuracy of three radiographic dental age estimation methods in Brazilians.三种用于巴西人群的牙科放射学年龄估计方法的有效性和准确性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Feb;283:128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
The Demirjian versus the Willems method for dental age estimation in different populations: A meta-analysis of published studies.不同人群中用于牙齿年龄估计的德米尔坚法与威廉姆斯法:已发表研究的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0186682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186682. eCollection 2017.
8
Is Willems method universal for age estimation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.威廉姆斯方法在年龄估计方面是否通用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Nov;52:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
A comparative evaluation of the applicability of two adapted Häävikko methods for age estimation of 5-15 year old Indian children.两种改良的哈伊维科方法在印度5至15岁儿童年龄估计中的适用性比较评估。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2016 Dec 1;34(2):21-34.
10
Reliability and validity of five radiographic dental-age estimation methods in a population of Malaysian children.马来西亚儿童群体中五种口腔X光片牙齿年龄估计方法的可靠性和有效性
J Investig Clin Dent. 2016 Feb;7(1):102-9. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12116. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

德米尔詹、威廉姆斯和哈维科方法在克罗地亚儿童中的适用性。

Applicability of the Demirjian, Willems and Haavikko methods in Croatian children.

机构信息

Bedek Dental Clinic, Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Dental Anthropology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2022 Aug 30;40(2):21-30.

PMID:36027895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942799/
Abstract

Age estimation is an inescapable part of every identification process. During growth and development, it is possible to estimate age based on the developmental stages of teeth. The aim of this study was to evaluate three frequently used methods for dental age estimation on a broad sample of Croatian children. The sample comprised 1996 digital, standardized orthopantomograms of children (1121 boys and 875 girls) aged 5 to 16, collected in four major Croatian cities. Age was estimated according to the Demirjian, Willems and Haavikko methods and the accuracy of the estimation was evaluated. The Kappa for intra-examiner agreement was 0.83 for the Haavikko stages and 0.92 for the Demirjian stages. Using the Demirjian method, the average overestimation of age was 0.80 years for boys and 0.84 years for girls. The Willems method overestimated the mean age by 0.41 years in boys and 0.22 years in girls. The Haavikko method underestimated the mean age by 0.60 years in boys and 0.80 years in girls. The Willems method proved to be the most accurate and can be used for dental age estimation among Croatian children. The Demirjian and Haavikko methods showed greater deviation between dental and chronological age and require adaptation when used in the Croatian population.

摘要

年龄估算是每个鉴定过程中不可避免的一部分。在生长发育过程中,可以根据牙齿的发育阶段来估计年龄。本研究旨在评估三种常用于克罗地亚儿童的牙齿年龄估计方法。该样本包括来自四个主要克罗地亚城市的 1996 名 5 至 16 岁儿童的数字标准化全景片(1121 名男孩和 875 名女孩)。根据 Demirjian、Willems 和 Haavikko 方法估计年龄,并评估估计的准确性。Haavikko 阶段的内部检查者一致性 Kappa 值为 0.83,Demirjian 阶段的 Kappa 值为 0.92。使用 Demirjian 方法,男孩的平均年龄高估为 0.80 岁,女孩的平均年龄高估为 0.84 岁。Willems 方法使男孩的平均年龄高估了 0.41 岁,女孩的平均年龄高估了 0.22 岁。Haavikko 方法使男孩的平均年龄低估了 0.60 岁,女孩的平均年龄低估了 0.80 岁。Willems 方法被证明是最准确的,可以用于克罗地亚儿童的牙齿年龄估计。Demirjian 和 Haavikko 方法显示出牙齿年龄和实际年龄之间的偏差更大,在克罗地亚人群中使用时需要进行调整。