Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Public Health Medical Service, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jan 5;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0715-7.
Low socioeconomic status can increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, but it remains unclear whether this negative association is attributed to inadequate prenatal care. Korea has been adopting a universal healthcare system. All Korean citizens must be enrolled National Health Insurance (NHI) or be recipient of Medical Aid (MA). In addition, Korean government launched a financial support system for antenatal care for all pregnant women in 2008. Therefore, in theory, there is no financial barrier to receive prenatal cares regardless of someone's social class. However, it is still unclear whether adverse pregnancy outcomes observed in low-income women are attributable to low SES or to economic barriers specific to the utilization of medical services. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether socioeconomic status affects pregnancy outcomes after the introduction of this support system, which allows all pregnant women to receive adequate prenatal care regardless of socioeconomic status.
Using the National Health Insurance database in Korea, we selected women who gave birth between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. As a proxy indicator reflecting socioeconomic status, we classified subjects as MA recipient ("low" SES) or a NHI beneficiary ("middle/high" SES).
In the MA group, 29.4% women received inadequate prenatal care, compared to 11.4% in the NHI group. Mothers in the MA group were more likely to have an abortion (30.1%), rather than deliver a baby, than those in the NHI group (20.7%, P < 0.001). Mothers in the MA group were also more likely to undergo a Caesarean delivery (45.8%; NHI group: 39.6%, P < 0.001), and have preeclampsia (1.5%; NHI group: 0.6%, P < 0.001), obstetric hemorrhage (4.7%; NHI group: 3.9%, P = 0.017), and a preterm delivery (2.1%; NHI group: 1.4%, P < 0.001) than those in the NHI group.
Women in the MA group tended to show higher rates of abortion, Caesarean delivery, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and obstetrical hemorrhage than those in the NHI group Therefore, health authorities should consider investigating what kind of barriers exist or what factors may affect these inequitable outcomes.
低社会经济地位可能会增加不良妊娠结局的风险,但尚不清楚这种负向关联是否归因于产前保健不足。韩国一直在推行全民医疗保健制度。所有韩国公民必须参加国家健康保险(NHI)或医疗援助(MA)。此外,韩国政府于 2008 年为所有孕妇推出了产前保健财政支持系统。因此,理论上,无论社会阶层如何,接受产前保健都不存在经济障碍。然而,低收入妇女所观察到的不良妊娠结局是否归因于低 SES 或特定于医疗服务利用的经济障碍仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查在引入该支持系统后,社会经济地位是否会影响妊娠结局,该系统允许所有孕妇无论社会经济地位如何都能获得足够的产前保健。
使用韩国国家健康保险数据库,我们选择了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日分娩的妇女。作为反映社会经济地位的代理指标,我们将受试者分为 MA 受助人(“低” SES)或 NHI 受助人(“中/高” SES)。
在 MA 组中,29.4%的妇女接受的产前保健不足,而 NHI 组中这一比例为 11.4%。与 NHI 组(20.7%,P<0.001)相比,MA 组的母亲更有可能堕胎(30.1%),而不是分娩。MA 组的母亲更有可能行剖宫产术(45.8%;NHI 组:39.6%,P<0.001),且患有子痫前期(1.5%;NHI 组:0.6%,P<0.001)、产科出血(4.7%;NHI 组:3.9%,P=0.017)和早产(2.1%;NHI 组:1.4%,P<0.001)的风险高于 NHI 组。
MA 组的妇女堕胎、剖宫产术、子痫前期、早产和产科出血的比率均高于 NHI 组。因此,卫生当局应考虑调查存在哪些障碍或哪些因素可能影响这些不平等的结果。