Metcalfe Amy, Sabr Yasser, Hutcheon Jennifer A, Donovan Lois, Lyons Janet, Burrows Jason, Joseph K S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.
J Endocr Soc. 2017 Nov 20;1(12):1540-1549. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00376. eCollection 2017 Dec 1.
Multiple consensus statements decree that women with diabetes mellitus should have comparable birth outcomes to women without diabetes mellitus; however, there is a scarcity of contemporary population-based studies on this issue.
To examine temporal trends in obstetric interventions and perinatal outcomes in a population-based cohort of women with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes mellitus compared with a control population.
Cross-sectional study.
National hospitalization data (Canada except Quebec) from 2004 to 2015.
Pregnant women with type 1 (n = 7362), type 2 (n = 11,028), and gestational diabetes mellitus (n = 149,780) and women without diabetes mellitus (n = 2,688,231).
Rates of obstetric intervention, maternal morbidity, and neonatal morbidity/mortality.
A consistent relationship was generally observed between diabetes mellitus subtype and obstetric outcomes, with women with type 1 diabetes mellitus having the highest rate of intervention and the highest rates of adverse perinatal outcomes followed by women with type 2 diabetes mellitus and women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Rates of severe preeclampsia were 1.2% among women without diabetes mellitus, 2.1% among women with gestational diabetes mellitus, 4.2% among women with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 7.5% among women with type 1 diabetes mellitus ( < 0.001). The rate of neonatal morbidity ranged from 8.7% in women without diabetes mellitus to 11.0%, 17.4%, and 24.1% in women with gestational, type 2, and type 1 diabetes mellitus, respectively ( < 0.001).
In a contemporary obstetric population, women with diabetes mellitus remain at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with women without diabetes mellitus.
多项共识声明规定,患有糖尿病的女性应与未患糖尿病的女性具有相似的分娩结局;然而,目前缺乏关于这一问题的基于当代人群的研究。
在一个基于人群的队列中,比较患有1型、2型或妊娠期糖尿病的女性与对照人群在产科干预措施和围产期结局方面的时间趋势。
横断面研究。
2004年至2015年的全国住院数据(加拿大魁北克省除外)。
患有1型糖尿病(n = 7362)、2型糖尿病(n = 11,028)和妊娠期糖尿病(n = 149,780)的孕妇以及未患糖尿病的女性(n = 2,688,231)。
产科干预率、孕产妇发病率和新生儿发病率/死亡率。
通常在糖尿病亚型与产科结局之间观察到一致的关系,1型糖尿病女性的干预率最高,不良围产期结局发生率也最高,其次是2型糖尿病女性和妊娠期糖尿病女性。未患糖尿病女性的重度子痫前期发生率为1.2%,妊娠期糖尿病女性为2.1%,2型糖尿病女性为4.2%,1型糖尿病女性为7.5%(P<0.001)。新生儿发病率在未患糖尿病女性中为8.7%,在妊娠期糖尿病、2型糖尿病和1型糖尿病女性中分别为11.0%、17.4%和24.1%(P<0.001)。
在当代产科人群中,与未患糖尿病的女性相比,患有糖尿病的女性不良妊娠结局风险仍然增加。