• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成功的现在,成功的未来?成功老龄化的非二元模型评估。

Successful Present, Successful Future? Assessment of a Nonbinary Model of Successful Aging.

机构信息

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2019 Jul 16;59(4):727-737. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx198.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnx198
PMID:29309575
Abstract

PURPOSE

Though many models of successful aging exist, there is a need for assessments of the empirical validity of these models and their measures. This study tests the validity of the multidimensional model of successful aging presented by Young and colleagues.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Expanding on an earlier validation study, this analysis uses 1,211 respondents from the Americans' Changing Lives (ACL) study to determine predictive and discriminant validity. Respondents were surveyed in 1986, 1989, and 1994, providing an opportunity to assess if a baseline 5-point successful aging scale is associated with present and future outcomes. Validators include self-report items and interviewer recorded observations. In addition, a survival analysis of 24 years of ACL mortality data is conducted to confirm that baseline successful aging decreases risk of all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Results illustrate that, in some cases as far as 8 years in the future, low successful aging scores correspond with higher risk of future hospitalization and depressive episodes, interviewer observed difficulty moving around, low self-rated health, and decreased life satisfaction. Lowest scorers also had a 356% higher risk of mortality compared to individuals with the highest scores.

IMPLICATIONS

These findings provide further evidence that Young and colleagues' successful aging construct is empirically valid and could be applied in future research and practice. Most respondents had middling scores, suggesting that future analyses should be cautious about concealing heterogeneity by operationalizing successful aging as a binary outcome.

摘要

目的

尽管存在许多成功老龄化的模式,但仍需要评估这些模式及其衡量标准的实证有效性。本研究检验了 Young 及其同事提出的多维成功老龄化模型的有效性。

设计与方法

在先前的验证性研究的基础上,本分析使用来自美国人生活变化(ACL)研究的 1211 名受访者,以确定预测性和判别有效性。受访者在 1986 年、1989 年和 1994 年接受了调查,有机会评估基线的 5 分成功老龄化量表是否与现在和未来的结果相关。验证因素包括自我报告的项目和访谈者记录的观察。此外,还对 ACL 死亡数据进行了 24 年的生存分析,以确认基线成功老龄化降低了全因死亡率的风险。

结果

结果表明,在某些情况下,甚至在未来 8 年内,低成功老龄化评分与未来住院和抑郁发作、访谈者观察到的行动困难、低自我报告健康和生活满意度下降的风险增加相关。与得分最高的个体相比,得分最低的个体的死亡率风险高 356%。

意义

这些发现进一步证明了 Young 及其同事的成功老龄化结构具有实证有效性,并可应用于未来的研究和实践。大多数受访者的得分居中,这表明未来的分析应该谨慎,不要将成功老龄化操作化为二元结果,从而掩盖异质性。

相似文献

1
Successful Present, Successful Future? Assessment of a Nonbinary Model of Successful Aging.成功的现在,成功的未来?成功老龄化的非二元模型评估。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jul 16;59(4):727-737. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx198.
2
Reliability and validity of a self-rated analogue scale for global measure of successful aging.自我评定模拟量表用于全球成功老龄化综合测量的信度和效度。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;22(8):829-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
3
A study on the relationship between perceptions of successful aging and life satisfaction of Turkish elderly people.一项关于土耳其老年人对成功老龄化的认知与生活满意度之间关系的研究。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2020 Apr;56(2):386-392. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12446. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Validation of a novel successful aging construct.一种新型成功老龄化概念的验证。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Jun;10(5):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.01.003.
5
Multiple trajectories of successful aging of older and younger cohorts.多个老年和年轻队列成功老龄化的轨迹。
Gerontologist. 2012 Dec;52(6):843-56. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns005. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
6
Successful Aging from the Viewpoint of Older Adults: Development of a Brief Successful Aging Inventory (SAI).从老年人视角看成功老龄化:简版成功老龄化量表(SAI)的编制
Gerontology. 2017;63(4):359-371. doi: 10.1159/000455252. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
What do self-efficacy items measure? Examining the discriminant content validity of self-efficacy items.自我效能感项目测量什么?检验自我效能感项目的区分内容效度。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(3):597-611. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12306. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
Assessing the Validity of Self-Rated Health with the Short Physical Performance Battery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the International Mobility in Aging Study.用简短体能测试评估自评健康状况的有效性:老龄化研究中国际流动性的横断面分析
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 18;11(4):e0153855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153855. eCollection 2016.
9
Binary and Nonbinary Measures of Successful Aging: Do They Yield Comparable Conclusions?成功老龄化的二进制和非二进制衡量标准:它们是否得出可比的结论?
Res Aging. 2019 Jun;41(5):467-494. doi: 10.1177/0164027518819208. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
10
Subjective Successful Aging Predicts Probability of Mortality Over 9 Years Among Adults Aged 50-74.主观成功老龄化预测 50-74 岁成年人 9 年内死亡概率。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jul 1;64(7). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad148.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Healthy Aging Score and Its Association With All-Cause Mortality: Findings From the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.评估健康老龄化评分及其与全因死亡率的关联:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的结果
Innov Aging. 2023 Jan 30;7(2):igad006. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad006. eCollection 2023.
2
The Relationship Between Successful Aging and All-Cause Mortality Risk in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.老年人成功老龄化与全因死亡风险的关系:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 9;8:740559. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.740559. eCollection 2021.
3
Active Ageing across the Life Course: Towards a Comprehensive Approach to Prevention.
积极老龄化贯穿生命全程:迈向综合预防策略
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Feb 3;2021:6650414. doi: 10.1155/2021/6650414. eCollection 2021.
4
Definitions of successful ageing: a brief review of a multidimensional concept.成功老龄化的定义:对一个多维概念的简要回顾
Acta Biomed. 2019 May 23;90(2):359-363. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i2.8376.
5
Midlife predictors of active and healthy aging (AHA) among older businessmen.中年时期对老年商人积极健康老龄化(AHA)的预测因素。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Feb;31(2):225-231. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1100-0. Epub 2018 Dec 24.