• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Eliciting community perspectives on research with older adults living with HIV through focus groups.通过焦点小组收集社区对针对感染艾滋病毒的老年人开展研究的看法。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(48):e8495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008495.
2
If We Build It, Will They Come? Perceptions of HIV Cure-Related Research by People Living with HIV in Four U.S. Cities: A Qualitative Focus Group Study.如果我们构建了它,他们会来吗?美国四个城市的艾滋病毒感染者对艾滋病毒治愈相关研究的看法:一项定性焦点小组研究。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018 Jan;34(1):56-66. doi: 10.1089/AID.2017.0178.
3
Acceptability of Cell and Gene Therapy for Curing HIV Infection Among People Living with HIV in the Northwestern United States: A Qualitative Study.美国西北部艾滋病毒感染者对细胞和基因疗法治疗艾滋病毒感染的可接受性:一项定性研究
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2019 Jul;35(7):649-659. doi: 10.1089/AID.2019.0021. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
What it Takes to Successfully Implement Technology for Aging in Place: Focus Groups With Stakeholders.成功实施就地养老技术所需的条件:与利益相关者的焦点小组讨论
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 3;18(5):e98. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5253.
5
Patients' perspectives on the development of HIV services to accommodate ageing with HIV: a qualitative study.患者对发展艾滋病病毒服务以适应艾滋病病毒感染者老龄化的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J STD AIDS. 2018 Apr;29(5):483-490. doi: 10.1177/0956462417735723. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
Participant views and experiences of participating in HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区参与者对参与艾滋病病毒研究的看法和经历:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):330-420. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2051.
7
Using Focus Group Feedback to Identify Patient-Centered Initiatives for Older Persons with HIV.利用焦点小组反馈意见,确定面向老年艾滋病毒感染者的以患者为中心的举措。
Clin Gerontol. 2022 May-Jun;45(3):661-672. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1769245. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
8
Multimorbidity With HIV: Views of Community-Based People Living With HIV and Other Chronic Conditions.多重疾病与艾滋病毒:社区艾滋病毒感染者及其他慢性病患者的观点
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):603-611. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
Only connect--the role of PLHIV group networks in increasing the effectiveness of Ugandan HIV services.紧密相连——乌干达艾滋病毒感染者群体网络在提高艾滋病毒服务有效性方面的作用。
AIDS Care. 2012;24(11):1368-74. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.656568. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
10
Recommendations for integrating physiotherapy into an interprofessional outpatient care setting for people living with HIV: a qualitative study.关于将物理治疗整合到艾滋病毒感染者的多专业门诊护理环境中的建议:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e026827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026827.

引用本文的文献

1
"I don't see a reason why we should be hidden from view": Views of a convenience sample of people living with HIV on sharing HIV status data in routinely collected health and care databases in England.“我不认为有什么理由要对我们隐瞒信息”:英格兰艾滋病毒感染者便利样本对在常规收集的健康与护理数据库中共享艾滋病毒状况数据的看法。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 12;20(2):e0316848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316848. eCollection 2025.
2
The Changing Needs of Peer Support Among Gay Men Living with HIV in Australia: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.澳大利亚感染艾滋病毒的男同性恋者同伴支持需求的变化:一项反思性主题分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Mar;54(3):1165-1179. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03079-x. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
3
Understanding the experiences and perception of people living with HIV on integrative traditional East Asian medicine management in Korea: an interview protocol for qualitative research.了解韩国接受整合式传统东亚医学管理的 HIV 感染者的体验和看法:定性研究的访谈方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 9;11(12):e051880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051880.
4
A Modified Alcohol SBI for Use among Older Adults Living with HIV.用于 HIV 感染者老年人群的改良酒精性自我伤害行为量表。
West J Nurs Res. 2020 Dec;42(12):1155-1162. doi: 10.1177/0193945920912946. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
5
Ethical considerations for HIV cure-related research at the end of life.临终时与治愈艾滋病相关研究的伦理考量。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Oct 20;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0321-2.

本文引用的文献

1
"We're giving you something so we get something in return": Perspectives on research participation and compensation among people living with HIV who use drugs.“我们给你一些东西,所以我们也能得到一些回报”:对吸毒的艾滋病毒感染者参与研究及补偿的看法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Jan;39:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
2
Use and Predictors of End-of-Life Care Among HIV Patients in a Safety Net Health System.安全网医疗系统中HIV患者临终关怀的使用情况及预测因素
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jan;51(1):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
Closing the gap: increases in life expectancy among treated HIV-positive individuals in the United States and Canada.弥合差距:美国和加拿大接受治疗的 HIV 阳性个体的预期寿命增加。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e81355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081355. eCollection 2013.
4
Chronic illness burden and quality of life in an aging HIV population.老年HIV感染者的慢性病负担与生活质量
AIDS Care. 2013;25(4):451-8. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.712669. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
5
HIV and aging: state of knowledge and areas of critical need for research. A report to the NIH Office of AIDS Research by the HIV and Aging Working Group.HIV 与衰老:知识现状和研究关键需求领域。HIV 和衰老工作组向美国国立卫生研究院艾滋病研究办公室提交的报告。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Jul 1;60 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-18. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31825a3668.
6
Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a synthesis of best processes.社区参与式研究中的社区咨询委员会:最佳流程综述。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 May;8(3):A70. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
7
Community-based participatory research: a new and not-so-new approach to HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment.基于社区的参与性研究:一种预防、护理和治疗艾滋病毒/艾滋病的新方法及并非全新的方法。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2010 Jun;22(3):173-83. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2010.22.3.173.
8
A Twenty-Two-Year-Old Community Advisory Board: Health Research as an Opportunity for Social Change.一个拥有22年历史的社区咨询委员会:将健康研究作为社会变革的契机。
J Community Pract. 2010 Jan 1;18(1):58-75. doi: 10.1080/10705421003766685.
9
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
10
Quality Care for People with HIV/AIDS: patients' perspectives.为艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者提供优质护理:患者视角
HIV Clin Trials. 2004 Nov-Dec;5(6):406-15. doi: 10.1310/GQ98-PGK7-0T97-47XH.

通过焦点小组收集社区对针对感染艾滋病毒的老年人开展研究的看法。

Eliciting community perspectives on research with older adults living with HIV through focus groups.

作者信息

Nguyen Annie L, Brown Brandon, Taylor Jeff, Estevez Marlene, Loftus Rick

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Center for Healthy Communities, Department of Social Medicine and Population Health, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA HIV and Aging Research Project, Palm Springs Division of Infectious Diseases and Health Policy Research Institute, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, CA Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(48):e8495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008495.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000008495
PMID:29310331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5728732/
Abstract

Approximately half of all people living with HIV in the US are age 50 and older. Existing research highlights the health challenges of these individuals, but little work has focused on gathering input about concerns in participating in HIV and aging research. Prior to designing a prospective cohort study on HIV and aging, we elicited feedback from potential participants on general attitudes toward participation in a prospective HIV cohort study, and perspectives on important research topics relevant to older adults living with HIV.Three qualitative focus groups were formed.Three focus groups (5-7 participants each; N = 18) were held with older adults living with HIV. All discussions were audiorecorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis.Participants emphasized the importance of data confidentiality, shared concerns about study biases arising from sponsored research, and suggested that conflicts of interest should be independently assessed by "representative" boards made of community members. They urged researchers to be mindful of research "burnout," because many people with HIV participate in multiple research studies. A number of priority research areas emerged, including the gap in provision of end-of-life services.Many older adults with HIV are knowledgeable about the research process and offer valuable insights to researchers. Addressing participant concerns can facilitate inclusion and enhance HIV research success.

摘要

在美国,约一半的艾滋病毒感染者年龄在50岁及以上。现有研究突出了这些人的健康挑战,但很少有工作聚焦于收集他们对参与艾滋病毒与老龄化研究相关担忧的意见。在设计一项关于艾滋病毒与老龄化的前瞻性队列研究之前,我们就参与前瞻性艾滋病毒队列研究的总体态度以及与感染艾滋病毒的老年人相关的重要研究课题的观点,征求了潜在参与者的反馈意见。我们组建了三个定性焦点小组。针对感染艾滋病毒的老年人举行了三个焦点小组讨论(每个小组5 - 7名参与者;N = 18)。所有讨论都进行了录音和转录。使用内容分析法对转录文本进行了分析。参与者强调了数据保密的重要性,对赞助研究产生的研究偏差表达了共同担忧,并建议利益冲突应由由社区成员组成的“代表性”委员会进行独立评估。他们敦促研究人员留意研究“倦怠”问题,因为许多艾滋病毒感染者参与了多项研究。出现了一些优先研究领域,包括临终服务提供方面的差距。许多感染艾滋病毒的老年人了解研究过程,并能为研究人员提供宝贵见解。解决参与者的担忧有助于提高参与率并增强艾滋病毒研究的成功率。