Samanamalee Samitha, Sigera Ponsuge Chathurani, De Silva Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu, Thilakasiri Kaushila, Rashan Aasiyah, Wadanambi Saman, Jayasinghe Kosala Saroj Amarasiri, Dondorp Arjen M, Haniffa Rashan
Health Education Bureaue, No.2, Kynsey Road, Colombo, 08, Sri Lanka.
Network for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, 2nd Floor, YMBA Building, Colombo, 08, Sri Lanka.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0463-7.
This study evaluates post-ICU outcomes of patients admitted with moderate and severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) in a tertiary neurocritical care unit in an low middle income country and the performance of trauma scores: A Severity Characterization of Trauma, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, Injury Severity Score and Revised Trauma Score in this setting.
Adult patients directly admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care units of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka between 21st July 2014 and 1st October 2014 with moderate or severe TBI were recruited. A telephone administered questionnaire based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) was used to assess functional outcome of patients at 3 and 6 months after injury. The economic impact of the injury was assessed before injury, and at 3 and 6 months after injury.
One hundred and one patients were included in the study. Survival at ICU discharge, 3 and 6 months after injury was 68.3%, 49.5% and 45.5% respectively. Of the survivors at 3 months after injury, 43 (86%) were living at home. Only 19 (38%) patients had a good recovery (as defined by GOSE 7 and 8). Three months and six months after injury, respectively 25 (50%) and 14 (30.4%) patients had become "economically dependent". Selected trauma scores had poor discriminatory ability in predicting mortality.
This observational study of patients sustaining moderate or severe TBI in Sri Lanka (a LMIC) reveals only 46% of patients were alive at 6 months after ICU discharge and only 20% overall attained a good (GOSE 7 or 8) recovery. The social and economic consequences of TBI were long lasting in this setting. Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, A Severity Characterization of Trauma and Trauma and Injury Severity Score, all performed poorly in predicting mortality in this setting and illustrate the need for setting adapted tools.
本研究评估了在一个低收入中等收入国家的三级神经重症监护病房收治的中度和重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的重症监护病房后结局,以及创伤评分:创伤严重程度特征评分、创伤和损伤严重程度评分、损伤严重程度评分和修订创伤评分在此环境中的表现。
招募了2014年7月21日至2014年10月1日期间直接入住斯里兰卡国立医院神经外科重症监护病房的中度或重度TBI成年患者。使用基于格拉斯哥扩展结局量表(GOSE)的电话调查问卷来评估患者受伤后3个月和6个月的功能结局。在受伤前以及受伤后3个月和6个月评估损伤的经济影响。
101名患者纳入研究。重症监护病房出院时、受伤后3个月和6个月的生存率分别为68.3%、49.5%和45.5%。受伤后3个月的幸存者中,43名(86%)在家生活。只有19名(38%)患者恢复良好(根据GOSE 7和8定义)。受伤后3个月和6个月,分别有25名(50%)和14名(30.4%)患者变得“经济依赖”。选定的创伤评分在预测死亡率方面的鉴别能力较差。
这项对斯里兰卡(一个低收入中等收入国家)中度或重度TBI患者的观察性研究表明,重症监护病房出院后6个月只有46%的患者存活,总体上只有20%达到良好(GOSE 7或8)恢复。在这种情况下,TBI的社会和经济后果是长期的。损伤严重程度评分、修订创伤评分、创伤严重程度特征评分和创伤和损伤严重程度评分,在这种情况下预测死亡率的表现都很差,说明了需要适合该环境的工具。