• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简洁易记:用户名的复杂性比客观声誉更能决定可信度。

Make It Short and Easy: Username Complexity Determines Trustworthiness Above and Beyond Objective Reputation.

作者信息

Silva Rita R, Chrobot Nina, Newman Eryn, Schwarz Norbert, Topolinski Sascha

机构信息

Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;8:2200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02200. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02200
PMID:29312062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5742175/
Abstract

Can the mere name of a seller determine his trustworthiness in the eye of the consumer? In 10 studies (total = 608) we explored username complexity and trustworthiness of eBay seller profiles. Name complexity was manipulated through variations in username pronounceability and length. These dimensions had strong, independent effects on trustworthiness, with sellers with easy-to-pronounce or short usernames being rated as more trustworthy than sellers with difficult-to-pronounce or long usernames, respectively. Both effects were repeatedly found even when objective information about seller reputation was available. We hypothesized the effect of name complexity on trustworthiness to be based on the experience of high vs. low processing fluency, with little awareness of the underlying process. Supporting this, participants could not correct for the impact of username complexity when explicitly asked to do so. Three alternative explanations based on attributions of the variations in name complexity to seller origin (ingroup vs. outgroup), username generation method (seller personal choice vs. computer algorithm) and age of the eBay profiles (10 years vs. 1 year) were tested and ruled out. Finally, we show that manipulating the ease of reading product descriptions instead of the sellers' names also impacts the trust ascribed to the sellers.

摘要

仅仅是卖家的名字就能决定消费者眼中他的可信度吗?在10项研究(总计608例)中,我们探究了eBay卖家资料中用户名的复杂性与可信度之间的关系。通过改变用户名的发音难易程度和长度来操控名字的复杂性。这些维度对可信度有着强烈且独立的影响,用户名发音容易或简短的卖家分别比发音困难或冗长的卖家被认为更值得信赖。即便有卖家声誉的客观信息,这两种影响仍反复出现。我们推测名字复杂性对可信度的影响基于高与低处理流畅度的体验,而对潜在过程几乎没有意识。支持这一观点的是,当明确要求参与者这样做时,他们无法纠正用户名复杂性的影响。基于将名字复杂性的差异归因于卖家来源(内群体与外群体)、用户名生成方法(卖家个人选择与计算机算法)以及eBay资料的使用时长(10年与1年)这三种替代解释经过测试后被排除。最后,我们表明操控产品描述的易读性而非卖家名字也会影响赋予卖家的信任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/68b337c881d1/fpsyg-08-02200-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/875084fc465e/fpsyg-08-02200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/bbf340034df8/fpsyg-08-02200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/ac3181dab450/fpsyg-08-02200-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/97b0da4dd4a3/fpsyg-08-02200-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/564fc2867eed/fpsyg-08-02200-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/51f49d16c10d/fpsyg-08-02200-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/db1871923085/fpsyg-08-02200-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/391ac29d94cd/fpsyg-08-02200-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/68b337c881d1/fpsyg-08-02200-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/875084fc465e/fpsyg-08-02200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/bbf340034df8/fpsyg-08-02200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/ac3181dab450/fpsyg-08-02200-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/97b0da4dd4a3/fpsyg-08-02200-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/564fc2867eed/fpsyg-08-02200-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/51f49d16c10d/fpsyg-08-02200-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/db1871923085/fpsyg-08-02200-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/391ac29d94cd/fpsyg-08-02200-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f62/5742175/68b337c881d1/fpsyg-08-02200-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Make It Short and Easy: Username Complexity Determines Trustworthiness Above and Beyond Objective Reputation.简洁易记:用户名的复杂性比客观声誉更能决定可信度。
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;8:2200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02200. eCollection 2017.
2
Fluent processing leads to positive stimulus evaluations even when base rates suggest negative evaluations.流畅的加工过程会导致积极的刺激评价,即使基本比率表明负面评价。
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Nov;96:103238. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103238. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
3
Reputation effects in peer-to-peer online markets: A meta-analysis.同行评议在线市场中的声誉效应:一项元分析。
Soc Sci Res. 2021 Mar;95:102522. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102522. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
Optimal Pricing and Return-Freight Insurance: Strategic Analysis of -Sellers in the Presence of Reputation Differentiation.最优定价与退货运输保险:存在声誉差异时卖家的策略分析
J Syst Sci Complex. 2022;35(6):2302-2318. doi: 10.1007/s11424-022-1262-x. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
The effect of competition on discrimination in online markets-Anonymity and selection.竞争对在线市场歧视的影响——匿名性和选择。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 28;14(8):e0221857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221857. eCollection 2019.
6
Coevolution of trustful buyers and cooperative sellers in the trust game.信任博弈中信任买家和合作卖家的共同进化。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044169. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
7
Reputation transferability across contexts: Maintaining cooperation among anonymous cryptomarket actors when moving between markets.声誉在不同情境下的可转移性:在不同市场间转换时维持匿名加密市场参与者之间的合作。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb;76:102635. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102635. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
8
Do Reputation Systems Undermine Trust? Divergent Effects of Enforcement Type on Generalized Trust and Trustworthiness.声誉系统会破坏信任吗?执法类型对广义信任和可信度的不同影响。
AJS. 2015 Mar;120(5):1390-428. doi: 10.1086/681231.
9
Seller reputation and price gouging: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.卖家声誉与哄抬物价:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Econ Inq. 2021 Jul;59(3):867-879. doi: 10.1111/ecin.12993. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
How many cents on the dollar? Women and men in product markets.女性和男性在产品市场上的货币价值是多少?
Sci Adv. 2016 Feb 19;2(2):e1500599. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500599. eCollection 2016 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluency, prediction and motivation: how processing dynamics, expectations and epistemic goals shape aesthetic judgements.流畅度、预测和动机:处理动态、期望和认识目标如何塑造审美判断。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20230326. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0326. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
Misinformation and the Sins of Memory: False-Belief Formation and Limits on Belief Revision.错误信息与记忆之罪:错误信念的形成与信念修正的局限
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2022 Dec;11(4):471-477. doi: 10.1037/mac0000090.
3
On the emergence of the in-out effect across trials: two items do the trick.

本文引用的文献

1
The dark side of fluency: Fluent names increase drug dosing.流利度的负面影响:熟悉的药名会增加药物剂量。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Sep;23(3):231-239. doi: 10.1037/xap0000131. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
The informative value of type of repetition: Perceptual and conceptual fluency influences on judgments of truth.重复类型的信息价值:感知流畅性和概念流畅性对真值判断的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 May;51:53-67. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Minimal conditions of motor inductions of approach-avoidance states: The case of oral movements.
在跨试验中出现的内外效应:两个项目就可以做到。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1180-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01715-6. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
4
Use of a language intervention to reduce vaccine hesitancy.使用语言干预措施减少疫苗犹豫。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04249-w.
5
: why we need to rename 'antimicrobial resistance'.为什么我们需要重新命名“抗菌药物耐药性”。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Sep;2(3):dlaa067. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa067. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Does the Price Support Policy Drive a Balanced Distribution of Profits in the Chinese Dairy Supply Chain? Implications for Supplier and Consumer Psychology.价格支持政策是否推动了中国乳制品供应链利润的均衡分配?对供应商和消费者心理的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 1;12:632355. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.632355. eCollection 2021.
7
Online Food Shopping: A Conceptual Analysis for Research Propositions.在线食品购物:研究命题的概念分析
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 16;11:583768. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583768. eCollection 2020.
8
Risk Overgeneralization in Times of a Contagious Disease Threat.传染病威胁时期的风险过度泛化。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 16;11:1392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01392. eCollection 2020.
9
Exploring the temporal boundary conditions of the articulatory in-out preference effect.探索发音进出偏好效应的时间边界条件。
Psychol Res. 2020 Apr;84(3):558-567. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1095-3. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
趋近-回避状态的运动诱导的最小条件:以口腔运动为例。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Dec;145(12):1589-1603. doi: 10.1037/xge0000217. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
4
Mouth-watering words: Articulatory inductions of eating-like mouth movements increase perceived food palatability.令人垂涎的言语:类似进食的口部动作的发音诱导会增加对食物美味的感知。
Appetite. 2016 Apr 1;99:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
5
Can I cut the Gordian tnok? The impact of pronounceability, actual solvability, and length on intuitive problem assessments of anagrams.我能解开戈尔迪之结吗?可发音性、实际可解性和长度对变位词直观问题评估的影响。 需注意,原文中“tnok”应是“knot”的拼写错误。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:439-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
6
Matching between oral inward-outward movements of object names and oral movements associated with denoted objects.物体名称的口部向内-向外动作与所指物体相关的口部动作之间的匹配。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Jan;31(1):3-18. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1073692. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
7
The differential effects of fluency due to repetition and fluency due to color contrast on judgments of truth.重复导致的流畅性和颜色对比导致的流畅性对真理判断的不同影响。
Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):821-37. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0692-7. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
What's in and what's out in branding? A novel articulation effect for brand names.品牌塑造中的“入”与“出”:品牌名称的一种新颖表达效果
Front Psychol. 2015 May 13;6:585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00585. eCollection 2015.
9
Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism.内群体偏袒中的偏好与信念。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Feb 13;9:15. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015. eCollection 2015.
10
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.内群体偏好合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1556-81. doi: 10.1037/a0037737. Epub 2014 Sep 15.