• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在跨试验中出现的内外效应:两个项目就可以做到。

On the emergence of the in-out effect across trials: two items do the trick.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Straße 2, 50931, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Economic Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental Methods, University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1180-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01715-6. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-022-01715-6
PMID:35867154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10192141/
Abstract

Individuals prefer letter strings whose consonantal articulation spots move from the front of the mouth to the back (e.g., BAKA, inward) over those with a reversed consonant order (e.g., KABA, outward), the so-called in-out effect. The present research explores whether individuals hold an internal standard or scheme of consonant order that triggers this effect. If this were the case, the in-out effect should already occur in one-trial between-subjects designs. If not, the in-out effect should emerge over the course of trials in within-subjects designs. In Experiments 1a-e (1b-e preregistered; total N = 2973; German, English, and Portuguese samples) employing a one-trial between-subjects design, no in-out effect was found. In Experiment 2 (N = 253), employing within-subjects designs with either 1, 5, 10, 30, or 50 trials per consonant order category (inward vs. outward), the in-out effect was absent in the first trial, but already surfaced for the first 2 trials, reached significance within the first 10 trials and a solid plateau within the first 20 trials. Of the four theoretical explanations, the present evidence favors the fluency/frequency and letter-position accounts and is at odds with the eating-related embodiment and easy-first accounts.

摘要

个体更喜欢口腔前部到后部的辅音发音点移动的字母串(例如 BAKA,向内),而不是辅音顺序相反的字母串(例如 KABA,向外),这种现象被称为里外效应。本研究探讨了个体是否持有触发这种效应的内部辅音顺序标准或方案。如果是这样,那么在单次被试间设计中就应该已经出现里外效应。如果不是,那么在被试内设计的试验过程中,里外效应应该会出现。在实验 1a-e(实验 1b-e 预先注册;总 N=2973;德语、英语和葡萄牙语样本)中采用单次被试间设计,没有发现里外效应。在实验 2(N=253)中,采用被试内设计,每个辅音顺序类别(向内与向外)有 1、5、10、30 或 50 次试验,里外效应在第一次试验中不存在,但在前两次试验中已经出现,在前 10 次试验中达到显著水平,在前 20 次试验中达到稳定平台。在这四个理论解释中,目前的证据支持流畅度/频率和字母位置解释,与与饮食相关的体现和易位优先解释不一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/0d50e6e93d52/426_2022_1715_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/e26780054efe/426_2022_1715_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/c5b4238f7056/426_2022_1715_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/adafb39d76a6/426_2022_1715_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/0d50e6e93d52/426_2022_1715_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/e26780054efe/426_2022_1715_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/c5b4238f7056/426_2022_1715_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/adafb39d76a6/426_2022_1715_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e5c/10192141/0d50e6e93d52/426_2022_1715_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
On the emergence of the in-out effect across trials: two items do the trick.在跨试验中出现的内外效应:两个项目就可以做到。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1180-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01715-6. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Can sequencing of articulation ease explain the in-out effect? A preregistered test.发音流畅性的测序能否解释进出效应?一项预注册测试。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Mar 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2326072.
3
Training articulation sequences: A first systematic modulation of the articulatory in-out effect.训练发音序列:对发音进出效应的首次系统调制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Oct;45(10):1725-1732. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000669. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
4
Mouth-watering words: Articulatory inductions of eating-like mouth movements increase perceived food palatability.令人垂涎的言语:类似进食的口部动作的发音诱导会增加对食物美味的感知。
Appetite. 2016 Apr 1;99:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
5
The role of fluency in preferences for inward over outward words.流畅性在对内向型词汇而非外向型词汇的偏好中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Nov;171:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
Front in the mouth, front in the word: The driving mechanisms of the in-out effect.口前、词前:进出效应的驱动机制。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Oct;119(4):792-807. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000196. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Oral approach-avoidance: affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics.口腔趋近-回避:肌肉发声动力学的情感后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):885-96. doi: 10.1037/a0036477.
8
What is preferred in the in-out effect: articulation locations or articulation movement direction?在进出效应中,更倾向于使用发音位置还是发音运动方向?
Cogn Emot. 2022 Mar;36(2):230-239. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1996336. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
9
What's in and what's out in branding? A novel articulation effect for brand names.品牌塑造中的“入”与“出”:品牌名称的一种新颖表达效果
Front Psychol. 2015 May 13;6:585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00585. eCollection 2015.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Grounded cognition and the representation of momentum: abstract concepts modulate mislocalization.具身认知与动量表征:抽象概念调节定位错误
Psychol Res. 2025 Jan 22;89(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02076-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Can sequencing of articulation ease explain the in-out effect? A preregistered test.发音流畅性的测序能否解释进出效应?一项预注册测试。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Mar 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2326072.
2
Can sequencing explain the in-out effect?测序能否解释进出效应?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Jun;26(6):449-450. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
3
Easy does it: sequencing explains the in-out effect.慢慢来:测序解释了进出效应。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Jun;26(6):447-448. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
The effect is robust across cultures and writing systems.这种影响在不同的文化和书写系统中都是稳健的。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Jan 3;377(1841):20200390. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0390. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
5
The articulatory in-out effect: replicable, but inexplicable.发音的进出效应:可复制,但无法解释。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;26(1):8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
6
What is preferred in the in-out effect: articulation locations or articulation movement direction?在进出效应中,更倾向于使用发音位置还是发音运动方向?
Cogn Emot. 2022 Mar;36(2):230-239. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1996336. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
7
The articulatory in-out effect: Driven by consonant preferences?发音的出-入效果:受辅音偏好驱动?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Feb;122(2):e1-e10. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000276. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Maybe favors: How to get more good deeds done.也许是恩惠:如何做更多的好事。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Sep;27(3):503-507. doi: 10.1037/xap0000357. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
9
The Price of Predictability: Estimating Inconsistency Premiums in Social Interactions.可预测性的代价:估计社会互动中的不一致溢价。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Feb;48(2):183-202. doi: 10.1177/0146167221998533. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
10
SNARC compatibility triggers positive affect.空间 N 关联效应兼容性引发积极情绪。
Cogn Emot. 2021 Mar;35(2):356-366. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1846018. Epub 2020 Nov 11.