• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内群体偏袒中的偏好与信念。

Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism.

作者信息

Everett Jim A C, Faber Nadira S, Crockett Molly

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford Oxford, UK ; Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Feb 13;9:15. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015
PMID:25762906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4327620/
Abstract

Ingroup favoritism-the tendency to favor members of one's own group over those in other groups-is well documented, but the mechanisms driving this behavior are not well understood. In particular, it is unclear to what extent ingroup favoritism is driven by preferences concerning the welfare of ingroup over outgroup members, vs. beliefs about the behavior of ingroup and outgroup members. In this review we analyze research on ingroup favoritism in economic games, identifying key gaps in the literature and providing suggestions on how future work can incorporate these insights to shed further light on when, why, and how ingroup favoritism occurs. In doing so, we demonstrate how social psychological theory and research can be integrated with findings from behavioral economics, providing new theoretical and methodological directions for future research.

摘要

内群体偏袒——即偏袒自己群体成员而非其他群体成员的倾向——已有充分记载,但驱动这种行为的机制尚未得到充分理解。特别是,尚不清楚内群体偏袒在多大程度上是由对内群体成员福利优于外群体成员的偏好驱动的,还是由关于内群体和外群体成员行为的信念驱动的。在这篇综述中,我们分析了经济博弈中内群体偏袒的研究,找出文献中的关键空白,并就未来的研究如何纳入这些见解以进一步阐明内群体偏袒何时、为何以及如何发生提供建议。在此过程中,我们展示了社会心理学理论和研究如何与行为经济学的研究结果相结合,为未来的研究提供新的理论和方法指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/352b08f48cc7/fnbeh-09-00015-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/64a7c91c737c/fnbeh-09-00015-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/a4d9c21cb06d/fnbeh-09-00015-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/cae1fbbaf7f9/fnbeh-09-00015-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/352b08f48cc7/fnbeh-09-00015-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/64a7c91c737c/fnbeh-09-00015-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/a4d9c21cb06d/fnbeh-09-00015-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/cae1fbbaf7f9/fnbeh-09-00015-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d79/4327620/352b08f48cc7/fnbeh-09-00015-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism.内群体偏袒中的偏好与信念。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Feb 13;9:15. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015. eCollection 2015.
2
The development of ingroup favoritism in repeated social dilemmas.重复社会困境中内群体偏袒的发展。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 28;6:476. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00476. eCollection 2015.
3
Using artificial agents to nudge outgroup altruism and reduce ingroup favoritism in human-agent interaction.利用人工智能来推动群体间的利他行为,减少人际互动中的群体偏见。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 9;14(1):15850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64682-5.
4
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.内群体偏好合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1556-81. doi: 10.1037/a0037737. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
5
Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity.群体间信息共享促进间接互惠中的内群体偏爱。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Nov 5;12:213. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-213.
6
Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies.17 个社会中的狭隘信任与合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12702-12707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712921114. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Does competition really bring out the worst? Testosterone, social distance and inter-male competition shape parochial altruism in human males.竞争真的会引发最恶劣的行为吗?睾酮、社会距离和男性间的竞争塑造了人类男性的狭隘利他主义。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e98977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098977. eCollection 2014.
8
The sense of belonging reduces ingroup favoritism in children.归属感会减少儿童的内群体偏好。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1059415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059415. eCollection 2022.
9
Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation.基于群体声誉的间接互惠中的内群体偏好和群体间合作。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Oct 21;311:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
10
The Destructive Effect of Ingroup Competition on Ingroup Favoritism.内群体竞争对内群体偏袒的破坏作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 23;9:2207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02207. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of perceived threat on the motive attribution asymmetry bias for groups in conflict.感知威胁对冲突群体动机归因不对称偏差的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0330927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330927. eCollection 2025.
2
Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation in intergenerational cooperation.代际合作中的内群体偏袒和外群体贬损
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jun 6;3(1):89. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00272-z.
3
The role of place-based consciousness in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A survey analysis across rural and urban subgroups in the U.S.

本文引用的文献

1
The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension.人类群体间冲突与利他主义的进化相互作用:狭隘利他主义理论综述及其扩展前景
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 7;281(1794):20141539. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1539.
2
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.内群体偏好合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1556-81. doi: 10.1037/a0037737. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
3
Benevolent characteristics promote cooperative behaviour among humans.友善的特质促进人类之间的合作行为。
基于地点的意识在新冠疫苗犹豫中的作用:美国城乡亚组的调查分析
Soc Sci Med. 2025 May;373:118019. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118019. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
4
Judgment of Social Traits and Emotions of "Neutral" Avatars.对“中性”虚拟形象的社会特质与情感的判断
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2025 Mar;28(3):196-201. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2024.0401. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
5
Approaches to ensure an equitable and fair admissions process for medical training.确保医学培训招生过程公平公正的方法。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Dec 20;4(1):275. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00697-3.
6
Task-dependent functional connectivity changes in response to varying levels of social support.响应不同水平的社会支持时,任务依赖性功能连接的变化。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Oct 3;10(5):e170. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.742.
7
Asymmetric cognitive learning mechanisms underlying the persistence of intergroup bias.群体间偏见持续存在背后的不对称认知学习机制。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Feb 15;2(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00061-0.
8
Using artificial agents to nudge outgroup altruism and reduce ingroup favoritism in human-agent interaction.利用人工智能来推动群体间的利他行为,减少人际互动中的群体偏见。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 9;14(1):15850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64682-5.
9
Teachers' Punishment Intensity and Student Observer Trust: A Moderated Mediation Model.教师惩罚强度与学生观察者信任:一个有调节的中介模型。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 1;14(6):471. doi: 10.3390/bs14060471.
10
Familiarity Determines Whether Accent Affects Attitudes and Behaviors of the Listener.熟悉程度决定口音是否会影响听众的态度和行为。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 22;14(6):430. doi: 10.3390/bs14060430.
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e102881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102881. eCollection 2014.
4
Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness.儿童对自私行为的第三方惩罚中内群体偏袒的发展
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 2;111(35):12710-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402280111. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
5
Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses.他们的痛苦给予我们愉悦:群体间动态如何塑造共情失败与反共情反应。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov 1;55:110-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007.
6
Similarity increases altruistic punishment in humans.相似性增加人类的利他惩罚。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 26;110(48):19318-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215443110. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
7
The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.种族偏见的代价:最后通牒博弈中的群体间谈判。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2498-504. doi: 10.1177/0956797613496435. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
A model of human cooperation in social dilemmas.人类在社会困境中的合作模型。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 29;8(8):e72427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072427. eCollection 2013.
9
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed.自发的给予和算计的贪婪。
Nature. 2012 Sep 20;489(7416):427-30. doi: 10.1038/nature11467.
10
Evolution of in-group favoritism.内群体偏好的演变。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:460. doi: 10.1038/srep00460. Epub 2012 Jun 21.